News Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
So is their thinking here "Route 66 is so old now it's part of the old west?" Are the 1960s now considered the old west era? I just can't begin to understand the thought process. It's like six flags putting batman in it's wild west area. I don't even understand how they will stifle the noise enough to not make the old west area sound like a tourist attraction on a freeway.

The atmosphere was perfect before, as the Haunted Mansion here is "Hudson river style" it sat on a river of America. The Liberty Belle seemed to tour all kinds of old Americana historic feelings. This also is the superior TSI with the fort.

No matter how many times I look at the low rez renderings, I can't seem to understand what the area around CBJ is going to look like. I see it there but it looks like nothing else near it that doesn't look like a vague AI mash. I mean the smart thing to do would be to build buildings across from it to at least create a downtown western town area but no....they gotta put some bland things that I can't tell if they are snowy mountains or the comet ice from the old Star Tours, after falling in the river somehow.

I prob posted in this thread before but I can't find it, and I always mix up where I complained.
We're not getting the Route 66 of Radiator Springs.
I wish we were - and that it was behind Big Thunder.
We're getting a Rallye Race that doesn't occur in Cars.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
The only part I’m concerned about is what steps they take (or don’t take) to actually achieve the conceptual justification of Cars in this area. That part is what they’re gonna have to sell me on. If they can successfully story wise justify it then I’ll be on board with the IP
We're not getting the Route 66 of Radiator Springs.
I wish we were - and that it was behind Big Thunder.
We're getting a Rallye Race that doesn't occur in Cars.
Part of me doesn't know how this will sell on The Cars feeling.

Looking at the concept art it looks like it's all outside with just a few shacks for souvenirs or food service. If it rains and even knowing doesn't last long here I feel it will make people runaway from there. In DCA you wouldn't have to your in the town setting of the movie, you can hang at Flo's or the many stores fronts. If it were to storm at night how dark would it be.. it's not neon lights of the ambience of Radiator Spring's.

I truly hope it end result would better off than if Disneyland finally brought a Frozen experience except it's a Land off the woods in Frozen II which would be odd contrast to The filmtastic setting of The World of Arendale provides with lights, scenic atmosphere and backdrop landscape recognizable and beloved.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
So is their thinking here "Route 66 is so old now it's part of the old west?" Are the 1960s now considered the old west era? I just can't begin to understand the thought process. It's like six flags putting batman in it's wild west area. I don't even understand how they will stifle the noise enough to not make the old west area sound like a tourist attraction on a freeway.
HM, Mississippi paddle boats, CBJ, and Splash were never Old West.

The use of the word "Frontier" is a distortion of what it normally means.

If the land was called "Americana" or "American Adventure" there wouldn't be so many people setting their hair on fire over the theming.
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
I agree. I think the problem is Disney doesn't have modern wild west ip that actually worked, at least the problem in the limited minds of the current team. I would have gone with Western River If I had to choose. That thing SERIOUSLY needs to be made. A boat ride with bandits and dynamite and canyons and stuff that's not something you can really find. Knott's comes close with Timber Mountain, and there was once a bugs bunny ride like that in Six Flags Over Texas I think, but I can't think of anything else. There is no reason why they shouldn't build it except for their current obsession with IP. Disney used to stand above Universal because it created original attractions without IP needed, but still created an atmosphere all of their own. The S.E.A. Thing was so promising but where did they take it?


FIIIIIIRE IN THE HOOOOOOLLLLE!

 

JSouth25

Well-Known Member
I agree. I think the problem is Disney doesn't have modern wild west ip that actually worked, at least the problem in the limited minds of the current team. I would have gone with Western River If I had to choose. That thing SERIOUSLY needs to be made. A boat ride with bandits and dynamite and canyons and stuff that's not something you can really find. Knott's comes close with Timber Mountain, and there was once a bugs bunny ride like that in Six Flags Over Texas I think, but I can't think of anything else. There is no reason why they shouldn't build it except for their current obsession with IP. Disney used to stand above Universal because it created original attractions without IP needed, but still created an atmosphere all of their own. The S.E.A. Thing was so promising but where did they take it?
I think Western River Expedition would absolutely be a hit. Not only would it be an original attraction that fits perfectly in Frontierland, but I think that the success of the Red Dead Redemption video game series in recent years proves that modern audiences still care a lot about cowboys/bandits & Wild West stories.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
So is their thinking here "Route 66 is so old now it's part of the old west?" Are the 1960s now considered the old west era? I just can't begin to understand the thought process. It's like six flags putting batman in it's wild west area. I don't even understand how they will stifle the noise enough to not make the old west area sound like a tourist attraction on a freeway.

The atmosphere was perfect before, as the Haunted Mansion here is "Hudson river style" it sat on a river of America. The Liberty Belle seemed to tour all kinds of old Americana historic feelings. This also is the superior TSI with the fort.

No matter how many times I look at the low rez renderings, I can't seem to understand what the area around CBJ is going to look like. I see it there but it looks like nothing else near it that doesn't look like a vague AI mash. I mean the smart thing to do would be to build buildings across from it to at least create a downtown western town area but no....they gotta put some bland things that I can't tell if they are snowy mountains or the comet ice from the old Star Tours, after falling in the river somehow.

I prob posted in this thread before but I can't find it, and I always mix up where I complained.
It's based on the version of Yellowstone from Planes, which is in the same universe as Cars. No Route 66 is involved.
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
I think Western River Expedition would absolutely be a hit. Not only would it be an original attraction that fits perfectly in Frontierland, but I think that the success of the Red Dead Redemption video game series in recent years proves that modern audiences still care a lot about cowboys/bandits & Wild West stories.
I don’t think they realize RDR2 made over $725 million in its first weekend! The Wild West sells. Disney just doesn’t see that.
 

Mr. Sullivan

Well-Known Member
I wonder how much or little of the attraction you’ll see from pathways. Like I said, the environment they’re setting it in is perfect. Exactly what Frontierland needs actually. What I’ve wanted to see there for years! The Frontier is so much more than the rocks and dirt and dust of cowboys.

But the integration of the vehicles themselves into that scenery is what my biggest question is right now because that alters that scenery some. It looks fairly hidden in the artwork, and if so that’s perfect, but I also wonder how practical that is.
 

KDM31091

Well-Known Member
I think this concept would be better if it wasn't a Cars attraction -- not because I am opposed to Cars in general, but because it feels like it's going to really limit what this specific planned ride can offer. A themed outdoor ride through beautiful scenery with some interesting show scenes could be a fantastic attraction, but adding the Cars IP removes a lot of options.
This is why I hate the IP mandate. The Imagineers cannot create truly original, awesome attractions because they are hamstrung by the IP and the storyline.
 

FettFan

Well-Known Member
I don’t think they realize RDR2 made over $725 million in its first weekend! The Wild West sells. Disney just doesn’t see that.

Disney made a bad Lone Ranger movie and came to the conclusion that westerns aren’t popular.

Just like how Disney made a bad movie about Mars (the awful Mars Needs Moms) then decided to slit the throat of Andrew Stanton’s John Carter of Mars.


And yet Disney just keeps cranking out terrible Star Wars and Marvel TV shows.

Agatha Harkness? Random Sith Acolyte?

Who Cares Jake Gyllenhaal GIF by Saturday Night Live
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Disney made a bad Lone Ranger movie and came to the conclusion that westerns aren’t popular.

Just like how Disney made a bad movie about Mars (the awful Mars Needs Moms) then decided to slit the throat of Andrew Stanton’s John Carter of Mars.


And yet Disney just keeps cranking out terrible Star Wars and Marvel TV shows.

Agatha Harkness? Random Sith Acolyte?

Who Cares Jake Gyllenhaal GIF by Saturday Night Live
Your post insinuates all people hate all those things.

I don't. I didn't like Carter or Ranger. But I've liked (mostly) all the SW and Marvel D+ series.

So.... me. I care.
 

Sofiadad63

New Member
You guys know how there's always one thing that puts you over the edge? The straw that broke the camel's back.

This one is mine. This is unforgivable. The justification of it fitting into the existing land is somehow worse than Chapek's of Cosmic Rewind ("Peter Quill visited EPCOT as a kid"). This is the greatest desecration of Magic Kingdom in its history, and keep in mind Cinderella Castle was once turned into a giant Pepto Bismol cake, and later covered in toilet paper.

The company that announced this is simply not the same company as the one that invented the theme park, and is not deserving of the legacy that got it to this place.
I agree with you. People have said that the riverboat, TSI, Splash and CBJ weren’t the Frontier. Well they’re a heck of a lot more Frontier than the automobile. More and more Disney is becoming just another thrill ride experience, an amusement park, than it is a theme park. Just window dressing to get to the next coaster or other fast moving vehicle. They might as well bulldoze Fantasyland. Screw the kids and the grandparents. Or people with heart issues or people who just don’t like thrill rides. I might be finally done with Disney and I’ve been going since 1973. I even honeymooned at the Grand Floridian.
 

Indy_UK

Well-Known Member
This is why I hate the IP mandate. The Imagineers cannot create truly original, awesome attractions because they are hamstrung by the IP and the storyline.

I completely agree with you but I do think the IP mandate and advertisement does probably bring in more casual people to Disney.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom