peter11435
Well-Known Member
There are many differences.If they were able to find a way to make it work at Disneyland with Galaxy’s Edge, they could have figured it out for WDW too.
There are many differences.If they were able to find a way to make it work at Disneyland with Galaxy’s Edge, they could have figured it out for WDW too.
About a month ago I told someone who’s only seen galaxies edge in Florida that “the best part about Star Wars in California is the rivers of America - it improved the park so much more than adding the Star Wars area did”If they were able to find a way to make it work at Disneyland with Galaxy’s Edge, they could have figured it out for WDW too.
Ok. I cant explain physics to you. If you want to believe water is weightless, that we live in zero gravity, that concrete structures last forever, or that their deterioration doesn’t compromise the reason they were built in the first place, go for itYou need to just stop with this argument while you're behind and pivot to something else.
The river bed does not have to support the weight of the water. It's not a bowl.
They don't have to pump water into it. If they did, they wouldn't need to build a temporary dam and pump the water out for parts of it, they'd simply just drain it. [I've been corrected on some of this further down the thread] The gravitational pull you mentioned in your own statement gets the water where it needs to go.
Leaks don't matter for retaining the water. This isn't a swimming pool someone filled with a hose.
Put it this way - what do you think happens if you dig a hole next to a lake that goes below the waterline of the lake?
Do you know?
I'm pretty sure Disney's engineers know.
Seven Seas lagoon, connected to the ROA by a canal does not have a cement bottom but it's also not a natural body of water, either. The reason that doesn't just run dry is the same reason the cement doesn't have to hold all that water in ROA. At worst, water over time seeping through the cement has the ability to erode it and over a long enough period without mitigation efforts as a part of planned maintenance, it's possible that could jeopardize the integrity of the parts anchoring the track but as has already previously been mentioned, they didn't need to anchor the track to an entire bed of cement to begin with so any potential problem there is not what you're making it out to be and the solution, if they didn't want to preserve the full cement bottom would not need to be much more dramatic than when someone wants to put a dock pretty much anywhere in water that doesn't have a man-made bottom. They wouldn't even technically need to drain ROA to do it though for speed quality and cost, they probably would since they have the ability to control it enough to do that.
Of course there are differences. But that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have figured out some sort of solution to make it work.There are many differences.
And there were none that made senseOf course there are differences. But that doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have figured out some sort of solution to make it work.
I agree, but Walt Disney World is selling the “Resort” aspect and the FOMO part of missing out on the biggest new rides to the market.If that’s what people wanted most out of theme parks, Kings Dominion and Cedar Point would be competing with Disney as the most profitable parks.
As an engineer, I can assure you that everything has a lifespan regardless of how it may be maintained. At some point a structure will either fail or become far too expensive/labor intensive to repair or maintain.Yeah, that's what happens when care isn't taken to maintain something...
This is not part of Imagineers vision - this is a mandate from above.No because I assume the Imagineers have a vision
I think people would hope for a DL-style shortening of the RoA.I honestly don’t know how they would’ve expanded ”Beyond Big Thunder“ by building along the edges of the river without ruining the aesthetic of the Rivers of America anyway. They would’ve needed to craft the sight line in Frontierland (blocking views of the river) to prevent guests from seeing Villains from Frontierland.
Crazy right?I bet those people who were begging that a Cars Land clone wouldn't be built in DHS would much rather prefer that now as opposed to what has been announced.
Man just think if it had been this way: Galaxy's Edge in Echo Lake/Indiana Jones area expanding out into the parking lot. Toy Story Land where it is now. Cars Land where Galaxy's Edge currently sits. Monsters Inc Land where Animation Courtyard is. Hollywood Studios would have been a full day park by then. Then we could have just had Villains Land and all would have been fine.
I agree, but Walt Disney World is selling the “Resort” aspect and the FOMO part of missing out on the biggest new rides to the market.
The intangibles that historically differentiated the park are just that… intangible. But from a sheer/cold business marketing and balance sheet standpoint it’s a proverbial “tree falling in the forest”. There’s no KPI performance metric for it, and it doesn’t move DVC/timeshares or in park per capita spending numbers.
You are probably correct. The Imagineers were given a box to work in and this is was they came up with. But if anyone has watched any of those Disney ride documentaries they give the impression that there are still some organic processes that go into bringing a ride to fruition.This is not part of Imagineers vision - this is a mandate from above.
Now I am certain the imagineers will do their best with that mandate, although parts of the Epcot expansion make me wonder on basic design skills.
I see it more like this Disney tries to bring Park into a Park fast at Epcot because they know Universal is doing that with Epic Universe with Celestrial Park. Disney has a 2017 concept art with all water areas just like Epic. Disney then removes any trace of water and doesn't even bring back a small fountain after gutting down Fountain of Nations. Epcot ends up looking like a community college campus instead in the end.Also if there was such a desire for attractions and lands like this in a theme park, why doesn’t epic universe have something like this going in?
Are we describing the next Avatar film, the Weight of Water?No one's mentioning if the weight is distributed over the entire concrete floor or not. (It is.)
Let's say the weigh of the water is 10 tons. And you swim down three feet and lie flat on the concrete floor. Do you feel the weight of all 10 tons?
No.
You feel the weight of just the water above you in a column the shape of your body.
You have got to be kidding meYep, in that if we have the first American female president, it stays for 4 years with a new AA. In any other scenario, it switches to Muppets.
I’d hold off on these comparisons, because an unopened theme park shouldn’t become the de facto model for all parksAlso if there was such a desire for attractions and lands like this in a theme park, why doesn’t epic universe have something like this going in?
Star Wars Galaxy's Edge in Disneyland has two entrances I think, Villans would be a problem if only has one entrance.According to those in the know around here it does have to be there for a number of reasons. These are my favorite.
To balance out Villians Land. (Something for the youngins to do and to have something to eat crowds)
To eliminate choke points for the crowds expected to come to Villians and Beyond BTM.
To reinvent what we know of the Haunted Mansion/Liberty Square area.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.