News Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

Dear Prudence

Well-Known Member
I wish WDW would get a similar treatment- replacing Tom Sawyer with a new theme while keeping the island in tact. I don't care for Tom Sawyer either, as I'm sure most people nowadays agree with, but the island serves a great purpose to the parks.
Also, in re: ROA, I am less excited about the possibility of a partial retheme to the national parks, but that's not any more Native friendly than the current ROA.

They could retheme it the The Rescuers critters or something, so it works as a kid play area and ties into the recent addition of Bayou theming.
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
I feel many of you have already adequately expressed why this is a terrible decision and I don’t have much more to add. All I can say is, goodbye, old friend. You will be missed.
IMG_6799.jpeg
IMG_6808.jpeg
IMG_7405.jpeg
IMG_8558.jpeg
IMG_0227.jpeg
IMG_0012.jpeg
IMG_4074.jpeg
IMG_8974.jpeg
IMG_0909.jpeg

Night view from the pilot house of Fort Langhorn!
IMG_4577.jpeg


“Old soldiers never die, they just fade away.” - Douglas MacArthur
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
Can we not be excited no more for new things for Disney World because any sign of expansion at this point is always unnecessary. MOANA will not be necessary when it decides to replace The Jungle Cruise which is by all means cracking.
 

el_super

Well-Known Member
This is not the Architecture of Reassurance.

It could be. The big problem with the river and island as relaxing space is that you still have to PLAN to enjoy it. Whether that's just jumping in line, or planning it around your LL returns or what have you, you can't enjoy the space spontaneously. If they can build a relaxing space that allows people to wander in and discover it on their own, it might be better.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
No, a whole bath and row and buildings facing a wall of trees and rocks because it’s really the backside of an attraction would be considered bad design because it is bad design.
The only way to make this really work is to have the backside look like the dry west, not the Pacific Northwest and its evergreens. They would need to double to old west buildings on both sides of the street. I guess that is why the boat landing building is staying.
 

phillip9698

Well-Known Member
But by making the island accessible without the rafts, more people can go to it. More kids can run around the play areas, more people can get to the restaurant that would likely have more justification to be open all the time. We need quieter areas of the parks so they don't turn into super stressful, chaotic environments. The parks experience is already very overwhelming at times because of crowds and a lack of many places to go back and hide.

Last time I was at WDW, at one point my family and I found ourselves in the quiet back areas of the Morocco pavilion at Epcot. It was peaceful, quiet. A nice break from the insane crowds that were there that night. Same vibes on Tom Sawyer Island too. Parks need quieter, open spaces for people to explore and take in the atmosphere and escape from the insanity of the rest of the park.

I spoke on that in a later post. My family too enjoys the spaces in Morocco and Japan. Thing is, when we are there they are empty.

I don’t see how there can be any argument for a business to keep these spaces when people aren’t using them for their intended purposes. It would be one thing if people were actually using the laid back and peaceful areas, but in Epcot, MK, and AK they simply do not.

The very vocal minority will definitely cause a stir over this but the majority of Disney guests won’t miss the area at all.
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
It will be seen by those riders, but are those the most popular? Feel like Fantasyland, Tomorrowland and Adventureland are more popular.

There are always walls up somewhere at the parks.

This won't just be some random walls, though. It's much larger scale construction than that right in the middle of a major guest facing area.

Also, I'd wager at at least 90% of Magic Kingdom visitors are in Frontierland or Liberty Square at some point during their day. It's not like it's Rafiki's Planet Watch.

Anyways, as I said, they can't really hide it -- I'm just pointing out it's going to be really bad for a year or more for that whole area of the park.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Eventually EVERY attraction should be replaced. The parks aren't museums. They have to continuously evolve.
The root issue isn’t replacement. It’s a complete ignoring of context. This project is not actually responding the fundamental design and organization of Liberty Square and Frontierland. It’s a McMansion being plopped into an old neighborhood.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
Am I not allowed to like both? I love the national parks…but I love the RoA too!
You are, but I think it's unfair to compare TSI/RoA to the majesty, beauty and inspiring views found in an actual national park. To say that national park popularity in anyway translates into TSI/RoA. One is a fake recreation that is oddly located in a theme park with rides.
 

Dear Prudence

Well-Known Member
Can we not be excited no more for new things for Disney World because any sign of expansion at this point is always unnecessary. MOANA will not be necessary when it decides to replace The Jungle Cruise which is by all means cracking.
12-15 years ago, I would have been pumped.

But now I've seen every lazy, unremarkable, and cheaply slapped together thing, and I cringe at every announcement.
 

erasure fan1

Well-Known Member
Wait until they announce BTMRR is going also be Cars themed.

Bat-mobiles in the carverns, googly eyes on the font of the trains…..
No no no. It will become Woodys rootinist tootinist run away railroad.
Because then eventually things become stagnant. If every attraction is a classic that can never be touched then the parks become museums. I certainly could be wrong but I'm of the opinion that Walt would've replaced allo fo magic kingdom by now.
I agree 100%. The problem though, is Disney isn't at that point of need yet. They have more than enough space to expand all the parks with no loss of existing attractions. They have spots where they've closed things just sitting empty. Stitch, wonders of life, animation courtyard... I can see when they close or swap very low rated attractions. But unless it's a Stich level attraction, it doesn't need to go away. They have the space, they have the demand for something new and they need the capacity. It should be a no brainer for Disney, but sadly it's not.
 

basas

Well-Known Member
You are, but I think it's unfair to compare TSI/RoA to the majesty, beauty and inspiring views found in an actual national park. To say that national park popularity in anyway translates into TSI/RoA. One is a fake recreation that is oddly located in a theme park with rides.

Just to be clear, I didn’t make the comparison. They are completely different.

I do disagree with your opinion that the RoA are “oddly located”, though. I think they are the thematic anchor to the entire quadrant of the park.
 

jason976

Member
Kevin Costners western movie bombed hard at the box office this summer. Westworld was really only good for one season. And who could forget how the Lone Ranger did. The western theme, while charming isn’t really moving the numbers the suits care about. Does a relaxing area in a theme park have good numbers too? I hate the mentality but that seems like what we are dealing with
Western movies and tv shows were incredibly popular when Frontier Land was conceived. Designing this land then was indeed a business decision back then. Disney knew then that a Frontier Land would bring in the crowds and the dollars. That time had passed. The people in charge now are likely making the same decisions the ones in charge then would have made. What’s going to make young crowds convince their parents to bring them to Disney? TSI and ROA aren’t it. I will miss the views in that area but totally get this decision either way. On to new Horizons I guess we could say?? 😂
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
I like that but it still doesn’t solve the problem that a huge space that people don’t go to isn’t what Disney is looking for.

World Showcase in Epcot, which is often described as a concrete paved outdoor oven has so many shaded and beautifully landscaped spots that nobody goes to. My family loves chilling in the back of Morocco or in the elevated gardens of Japan when it gets hot. But nobody else is back there. As often as people complain about how hot Epcot is you would think the carefully manicured shaded areas would be hits. Nope. We often have those entire areas to ourselves.

Why should Disney dedicate more space to areas the overwhelming majority of guests don’t want to frequent?
People don’t go into those spaces because they’ve been stripped of their program.
 

DCLcruiser

Well-Known Member
Just to be clear, I didn’t make the comparison. They are completely different.

I do disagree with your opinion that the RoA are “oddly located”. I think they are the thematic anchor to the entire quadrant of the park.
Oops, I confused you with the OP to the comment.

I think if they had built Wilderness Lodge behind TSI it would make a lot more sense.
 
Last edited:

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
I spoke on that in a later post. My family too enjoys the spaces in Morocco and Japan. Thing is, when we are there they are empty.

I don’t see how there can be any argument for a business to keep these spaces when people aren’t using them for their intended purposes. It would be one thing if people were actually using the laid back and peaceful areas, but in Epcot, MK, and AK they simply do not.

The very vocal minority will definitely cause a stir over this but the majority of Disney guests won’t miss the area at all.
And you're right, no matter how much the vocal majority opinion online seems to be that this is a bad idea, it won't change anything. This isn't a rumor that can be stopped before it even hits production, this is a plan already approved and budgeted for. We could save the Country Bears, but we can't save the Rivers of America.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
No no no. It will become Woodys rootinist tootinist run away railroad.
That wouldn't be bad actually just add a few Woody and Jessie and Bullseye animatronics shoutin " YeeeHaa!" and "There's a Snake in My Boot" far more enriching alongside a real Cars Land in the distance with Radiator Spring's and RSR out Northwest. This makes it Walt Disney World's finest. Not take a Californian West Lookin DCA Grizzly Mountain Terrain Coast concept and shove it in our TSI.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom