maybe we should until it starts next year. We are all grasping at straws right now in every thread. We should probably settle in for the next few months.I agree. The mods should close this thread until construction starts in 2 or 3 years.
maybe we should until it starts next year. We are all grasping at straws right now in every thread. We should probably settle in for the next few months.I agree. The mods should close this thread until construction starts in 2 or 3 years.
Oh they will start construction sooner...they just won't finish it for many years, and seriously, the scope of work they are talking about is bigger than SWGE which took 4 years of construction... so I am not sure where people are getting the idea that all of this is going to happen in a year and a half...Demo will probably take that much time....It's a lot of property, and based on the released art, it is a lot of mountain range...and according to some, spectacular water features and natural beauty... That ain't happening in a year and a half...I agree. The mods should close this thread until construction starts in 2 or 3 years.
I am sure the festive walls will be up sometime next year.maybe we should until it starts next year
And that's just going by Cars portion alone!Oh they will start construction sooner...they just won't finish it for many years, and seriously, the scope of work they are talking about is bigger than SWGE which took 4 years of construction... so I am not sure where people are getting the idea that all of this is going to happen in a year and a half...Demo will probably take that much time....It's a lot of property, and based on the released art, it is a lot of mountain range...and according to some, spectacular water features and natural beauty... That ain't happening in a year and a half...
Ha, who ever said Cars will take a year and a half to complete is dreaming!!Oh they will start construction sooner...they just won't finish it for many years, and seriously, the scope of work they are talking about is bigger than SWGE which took 4 years of construction... so I am not sure where people are getting the idea that all of this is going to happen in a year and a half...Demo will probably take that much time....It's a lot of property, and based on the released art, it is a lot of mountain range...and according to some, spectacular water features and natural beauty... That ain't happening in a year and a half...
They gotta demolish Tom Sawyer first too.And that's just going by Cars portion alone!
Saying “Walt Disney loved trains and wanted a steam train at the park” isn’t speaking for Walt, it’s a fact.I really hate how people try to speak for Walt as if he's still with us and act like they know what he would think or say about something.
it will take them 2 years to try and figure out how to value engineer the concept....then the budget cuts will come and who knows what we will be left with...but at that point, they will have already demolished the ROA and TSI...much like they did with the botched EPCOT reboot.
I hope this isn't the case and it wouldn't surprise one bit. Just finding out that Rivers of Light was changed in Spring 2019, again is Bob under Iger taking something great at the same time calling an end to Illumination's Reflection's of Earth that same year! The then 2.0 IP River's of Light killed it and 2020 was the perfect excuse to retire it.it will take them 2 years to try and figure out how to value engineer the concept....then the budget cuts will come and who knows what we will be left with...but at that point, they will have already demolished the ROA and TSI...much like they did with the botched EPCOT reboot.
Spin, baby, spin. You just can’t help yourself. Cars going into TSI is NOT a cost savings initiative. This is absolutely an expansion. Go get some air.I would love to know what Walt would think about filling in ROA, removing TSI and removing riverboat instead of doing a true expansion.
But who knows, maybe like you said, he would be fine with it. We just don't know.
You are fine with filling in ROA, removing TSI and removing riverboat and that's fine.
We can agree to disagree.
No matter what we say here, TWDC will do what TWDC will do.
When a company does something that makes no common sense, its a normal human reaction to try to rationalize the act; to try to figure out the motive.
My guess is, its all about MONEY,
Putting Cars in, they can SELL MORE LL.
Also (possibly) putting Cars there could save MONEY instead of truly expanding the park on undeveloped land.
You call it spin, I call it trying to figure out why they are going to fill in ROA, remove TSI and get rid of the riverboat.Spin, baby, spin. You just can’t help yourself.
All good. Enjoy.You call it spin, I call it trying to figure out why they are going to fill in ROA, remove TSI and get rid of the riverboat.
The only thing I can come up with is because MONEY.
There does seem to be a weird motive by Iger to drastically change existing theme parks that goes beyond money.You call it spin, I call it trying to figure out why they are going to fill in ROA, remove TSI and get rid of the riverboat.
The only thing I can come up with is because MONEY.
I don't think there's any point in this day and age of the current company where you be able to try and find a common sense reason to why they are removing when already they are telling you it's an expansion and not a replacement of an original area, I don't care if some land is added to V. Did they even said for Cars was a retheme to Frontierland. Retheme isn't removing totally... If all this is just part of way more than what it's going to be then in order to keep it a secret for now they aren't going to say Disney World Forward.You call it spin, I call it trying to figure out why they are going to fill in ROA, remove TSI and get rid of the riverboat.
The only thing I can come up with is because MONEY.
You are right, Iger does not understand the parks, and why should he? He has no experience.There does seem to be a weird motive by Iger to drastically change existing theme parks that goes beyond money.
Ripping out Fountain of Nations is by far the worst example.
He doesn’t understand the Disney Parks at all…. He doesn’t get that Osbourne Lights and the Great Movie Ride were worth saving.
Is it Iger secretly and not Chapek who maybe seeked to end Illumination's ROE and River's of Light as well???There does seem to be a weird motive by Iger to drastically change existing theme parks that goes beyond money.
Ripping out Fountain of Nations is by far the worst example.
He doesn’t understand the Disney Parks at all…. He doesn’t get that Osbourne Lights and the Great Movie Ride were worth saving.
“Held up” is quite the way to describe a routine part of a process.Will see. The permits have already been held up. The fan reaction wasn't as great as expected either when it was announced.
So, we keep RoA and the riverboat, but build a big box around it so it isn't outdoors?The last thing Frontierland or MK needs ride wise is another outdoor E ticket.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.