News Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Sure, but the point of that post is that the guests don’t care that RoA is going.

Which seems true. Most visitors won’t care.
Eh…. “Spaceship earth is becoming Death Star” would get cheers too.

There are lots of complexities to all of this.

There are design elements from the limited concept art that I like - it looks similar to Grizzly Peak which is a lovely design.

But I am asking the question… what makes the magic kingdom the magic kingdom?

I don’t understand tearing down the heartbeat of the parks. The absolute worst was the fountain of nations.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
Taking a boat back from DHS today (saying a sad potential goodbye to MV4D) the boat-driving-guy was talking about what was announced. When he said that Cars was replacing the Rivers, people cheered.
Not one person said it's sad?
C'mon there had to be one local or Nostalgia visitor around or are they too sad to even have a say because nothing will change they know deep down inside.. look at splash mountain.
Also, I was at EPCOT today as well (very busy day) and I was looking at all of the green space. EPCOT is more relaxing than either MK or DHS because of all of the water and grass. So at least we’ll still have that.
🙏
 

Earlie the Pearlie

Well-Known Member
Not one person said it's sad?
C'mon there had to be one local or Nostalgia visitor around or are they too sad to even have a say because nothing will change they know deep down inside.. look at splash mountain.

🙏
I yelled “SAVE MUPPETS” when the guy said that we don’t know where Monsters Inc is going. Not sure I count though lol
 

DarkMetroid567

Well-Known Member
Me, too. But I must be a weirdo (as I’ve been told today)…because I still think cowboys are relevant to kids…because I’ve read Mark Twain’s books…because I think the riverboat is iconic…and now I guess because I’ve never complained there’s “too much to do” in a theme park 🤣
You’re def not a weirdo! All of those things are perfectly normal, but the passage of time and it changes they bring to our generations are inevitable.
WorldExplorer I'm so glad you had that experience. I don't think it makes you a freak at all. I think it's beautiful and what these parks are supposed to be about. Any child or adult who finds TSI boring is missing out.
I’m in agreement that TSI is fun, I even find it more fun as an adult than I do as a child. (Parks like Toverland in NL are great for this.) But predicting what kids are currently into or what they will be into is really tough. I don’t think it should be a shock that TSI has aged poorly.
 

MouseEarsMom33

Well-Known Member
genuine question, why is there such a distaste for attractions associated with ips?

Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t Disney land in part originally built by Walt Disney to promote his work in animation and promote then via attractions in a theme park ??

I understand there were a lot of original attractions as well ( but obviously some were also based off popular novel - book based - ips), but couldn’t one argue that Disney at the same time in the 50s didn’t have as huge of a catalogue film wise to make every single ride a movie based attraction?

I guess my point being is, there seems to be a lot of tug and war between rides being connected to ips. 20k leagues under the sea, journey to the center of the earth, these are some super beloved attractions but they are also based off ips.

So is it more about not like what Disney as a whole is producing animation wise lately and that’s why we hate when they are connected to ips?

Because y’all don’t seem to throw a fit about 20k leagues or journey to the center of the earth ?
I have always thought the same thing. There was not enough IPs back in the 50s.

Sleeping Beauty's castle was meant to advertise for the upcoming movie (I believe). There were many advertising companies in the parks.
 

basas

Well-Known Member
I have always thought the same thing. There was not enough IPs back in the 50s.

Sleeping Beauty's castle was meant to advertise for the upcoming movie (I believe). There were many advertising companies in the parks.

I’m not against IP’s (though I won’t deny some are). Tom Sawyer is an IP. I’m against IPs which don’t fit the appropriate theme of where they’re placed. And it seems Disney of 2024 has no problem shoehorning in IPs where they don’t belong.
 

Chef idea Mickey`=

Well-Known Member
I yelled “SAVE MUPPETS” when the guy said that we don’t know where Monsters Inc is going. Not sure I count though lol
It's better to be different in the minority even if your the only one. There's no way if I was there and heard that response that I wouldn't of said anything and that's speaks measures coming from a person who's dream was for Cars Land to come WDW. I'm not approved of this location and they miss the opportunity of building this Beyond Big Thunder let's not act like there's no room so you don't have the railroad in the way or roads!
 

Quietmouse

Well-Known Member
I’m not against IP’s (though I won’t deny some are). Tom Sawyer is an IP. I’m against IPs which don’t fit the appropriate theme of where they’re placed. And it seems Disney of 2024 has no problem shoehorning in IPs where they don’t belong.

Assuming frontier land isn’t changed all together.

Cars definitely fits if frontier land is changed as a whole to a more west coast theme
 

TinkerBelle8878

Well-Known Member
Don't know if its been mentioned but why wouldn't they put a Cars themed attraction either at the Tomorrowland raceway or where that Star Wars hotel thing that they shut down was? Seems like that was a failure anyway and close enough to DHS. Just seems to me like getting rid of an area of 'green space' that's peaceful for a lot of noise. There are ways to have both but clearly to the powers that be its one or the other. Can't have both.
 
I think that updating the Tomorrowland Speedway around Cars 3 is a missed opportunity. I mean, they can use the high-tech cars and the "Florida International Super Speedway" and it would fit SEAMLESSLY next to TRON. Here are some pics in case you don't know what I'm talking about:
1723515455341.png
1723515482466.png


1723515580577.png


TBH this overlay would have also worked well with Test Track but that seems like a touchy subject.

Anyway, not sure yet if I have officially formulated an opinion on Cars coming to RoA. I am excited for the new land, but I am someone that LOVED the free exploring feel of TSI.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Do we think this whole plan will go the way of the CBJ Toy Story redo.

No.
The backlash to this is really bad. And they can't use the racism shield like they did with Splash.
yes they can. Look at the dialogue surrounding The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to see how they’ll deploy it.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
Do we think this whole plan will go the way of the CBJ toy story redo. The backlash to this is really bad. And they can't use the racism shield like they did with Splash.
There’s no way they are backing off this.

I’m hoping - thought I’ll opening admits it’s extremely unlikely- that they might gain some sense and modify the plans a bit leaving the water next to LS and CBJ intact and dock the boat permanently. There’s no reason to remove all of the waterfront.
 

Quietmouse

Well-Known Member
I still have doubts on whether this will actually happen or not.

The fact that this is the more costlier option seems like it could be an easy budget cut if things don’t align financially at years end.

I am not sure how things are lately, but 10 years ago it was so common place to hear something announced and then disappear from existence a year later.


Again, not sure if this is past that stage or not, but I have to wonder if there a some higher up execs who control the purse strings that are weary of signing off to this project entirely still due to being the most costly option.
 

ednamodedarling

Well-Known Member
I still have doubts on whether this will actually happen or not.

The fact that this is the more costlier option seems like it could be an easy budget cut if things don’t align financially at years end.

I am not sure how things are lately, but 10 years ago it was so common place to hear something announced and then disappear from existence a year later.


Again, not sure if this is past that stage or not, but I have to wonder if there a some higher up execs who control the purse strings that are weary of signing off to this project entirely still due to being the most costly option.
I was under the impression this is the cheaper option. As building past the railroad would require zoning land that has not been touched or inspected in years & shutting down/potentially rerouting the railroad again.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom