Cars Land, Star Wars Land, Monstropolis...

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
Makes sense considering they still hype up Expedition Everest as a "recent addition" in ads in Southwest FL
I live in FL and see those commercials and I don't see it as advertising Everest as a new attraction, but simply reminding people that Animal Kingdom exists. Once Avatar and the nighttime show opens, Everest will probably start to take a backseat in advertising.
 

Ignohippo

Well-Known Member
Wait a minute, let me get this straight. You'd rather Disney go with Frozen, a movie that's been out 5 months, because you think it's timeless and will stand the test of time? Yet at the same time, Star Wars, a franchise that has been around for 37 years, isn't good enough for you simply because it isn't a Disney creation?

Talk about ridiculous.


Don't argue with it. It never makes sense. Save yourself the heartache.
 

Ignohippo

Well-Known Member
I live in FL and see those commercials and I don't see it as advertising Everest as a new attraction, but simply reminding people that Animal Kingdom exists. Once Avatar and the nighttime show opens, Everest will probably start to take a backseat in advertising.


Very true, but it's still the largest and most major thrill ride in a theme park resort sorely lacking thrill rides (and a beautiful and iconic structure as well). I don't see them backing off the promotion of Everest anytime soon.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Wait a minute, let me get this straight. You'd rather Disney go with Frozen, a movie that's been out 5 months, because you think it's timeless and will stand the test of time? Yet at the same time, Star Wars, a franchise that has been around for 37 years, isn't good enough for you simply because it isn't a Disney creation?

Talk about ridiculous.

I will try to phrase this simply, for your benefit: Frozen is a Disney creation. Star Wars isn't. I don't give a doughnut hole that Disney bought it. So YES it isn't good enough for me. Also, look at all of the other Disney princess creations that have definitely stood the test of time. Yet none of them, with the exception of Snow White, reaped anything like the media/public frenzy Frozen has. So it's pretty obvious it will stand the test of time. DUH.
 

Next Big Thing

Well-Known Member
I will try to phrase this simply, for your benefit: Frozen is a Disney creation. Star Wars isn't. I don't give a doughnut hole that Disney bought it. So YES it isn't good enough for me. Also, look at all of the other Disney princess creations that have definitely stood the test of time. Yet none of them, with the exception of Snow White, reaped anything like the media/public frenzy Frozen has. So it's pretty obvious it will stand the test of time. DUH.
Oh yeah, DUH. What was I thinking. :rolleyes:
 

michael.fumc

Well-Known Member
Did anything other than a tease come from this at D23 2013?
star-wars-orange-harvest-d23-expo-2013.jpg
 

Sped2424

Well-Known Member
By logical extension the every thread in this section should be one post long, as after the initial post everything else is discussion.
Not necessarily, most threads start off with news, and people tend to contribute to that news. This thread didn't start with either or and the real issue is that we have 30 different ongoing threads already covering these topics.
 

Pumbas Nakasak

Heading for the great escape.
Not necessarily, most threads start off with news, and people tend to contribute to that news. This thread didn't start with either or and the real issue is that we have 30 different ongoing threads already covering these topics.
So who gets to decide if a post is contributing further information or simply proffering opinion which forms a basis of a discussion.
 

zweltar

Well-Known Member
So who gets to decide if a post is contributing further information or simply proffering opinion which forms a basis of a discussion.
And on that note, who got to decide that a table was called a table? Who got to decide that a dog is, in fact, a dog? How do we know that the table is actually there?
112719c33c3a4698176435e6ea2914b2547614339725a7f396081e48a50eefec.jpg
 

Mr. Moderate

Well-Known Member
I was 10 years old in the spring of 1977 and remember the hype that was building for Star Wars, even before it really hit it big later that summer and beyond. Of course the playground at school was buzzing about it and the lucky kids who saw it first, were telling the rest of us how awesome it was. It seemed people were talking about it more and more and I remember damn near begging my father to take me to see it not even 3 weeks after it opened in May in my area. I do have to say, seeing that movie for the first time was one of those super special moments you always remember when looking back at your childhood and you don't forget. I'm 47 now and still remember being blown away at what I saw on the screen for the first time and how the special effects and sound, which were phenomenal for the era, had people gasping in disbelief and awe at some scenes. I'm not kidding or making this up either, I still recall seeing the land speeder scene floating on the desert floor of Tatooine and hearing some movie goers shout out. I got to see a few more times that year and with each passing week in the summer of 77, the lines got longer and shows were sold out. I think I must have saw it at least 10 times in that time period alone. SW had a big impact on Christmas 77 and Kenner Toys who made the SW stuff was caught off guard and their toys were like the Holy Grail that year.

Anyway the point to my going back in time here (and I apologise for the novel here) was I still recall how big of a cultural moment Star Wars was for America in 1977 and it was so big, it almost was a fad. I really do think Disney seriously has dropped the ball on not expanding the SW presence in Hollywood Studios and in TL in Disneyland in California. You can't guarantee on much in life except for death and taxes, but I can safely add this to the list as well. Disney properly builds a SW land in DHS and even if it's done in stages to coincide with the new movies coming out, would be one of the biggest game changers and money makers in theme park history. Period! I know some here will laugh at me, but if a 47 year old guy, who remembers back to May 1977 and the impact SW had, there's millions of fans across this county and globe who would flock to DHS to see a big budget, all the stops pulled out, Star Wars land. It can't be done cheap either and has to be similar in nature to Carsland and be the immersive experience like Carsland is. Plus once done properly and opened, the SW weekends that DHS currently has, can be expanded big time and the money making opportunities would be off the chart.

Just think about how the buzz and excitement if construction was going on and we could see the plans. Anyway, imho, Disney has dropped the ball here on this and the SW expansion needs to be green lighted like yesterday. I really hope they come to their senses very soon and get this ball (hopefully a giant one) a rolling.

Just my thoughts and opinion and thanks for taking the time to read.
 

Ignohippo

Well-Known Member
I will try to phrase this simply, for your benefit: Frozen is a Disney creation. Star Wars isn't. I don't give a doughnut hole that Disney bought it. So YES it isn't good enough for me. Also, look at all of the other Disney princess creations that have definitely stood the test of time. Yet none of them, with the exception of Snow White, reaped anything like the media/public frenzy Frozen has. So it's pretty obvious it will stand the test of time. DUH.


UGH. How you draw me in I'll never know, but i'll bite.

So, in your distorted logic, Uni should've never built Potter (a WB property) which has ended up being the absolute ultimate theme park experience, a complete game-changer and an enormous, enormous success simply because they didn't originate the IP?

And even though Disney owns Lucasfilm, they should sit on the rights and never build anything at all having to do with Star Wars?

Star Wars hasn't stood the test of time? It's going on 35 years and is still one of the most profitable IPs around!
 

Ignohippo

Well-Known Member
His excuse is hilarious. Then anything pulled by Lesseter/Pixar is not Disney's then.

Oh, don't get that discussion started too. No. Magenta Panther hates everything Pixar and doesn't believe anything Pixar should be in WDW.

Even though it's always been distributed by Disney, is synonymous with Disney and always has been, and is responsible for keeping the company afloat in the late 90s, MP doesn't think it belongs.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom