hemloc
Member
Thank you you beat me to it. He may have done some odd things in public, however, these child molestation charges were acquitted or thrown out.
Only because the complainants were paid off, er, I meant settled with... :brick:
Thank you you beat me to it. He may have done some odd things in public, however, these child molestation charges were acquitted or thrown out.
So when do we get "The Extra TERRORestrial Alien Encounter Tribute"?
I didn't read through this whole thread, so I may have missed that information, but how long were the lines?
I didn't read through this whole thread, so I may have missed that information, but how long were the lines?
Not to drag out another point less topic but I'm willing to bet there are more people who "think" MJ molested children then there are people who remember that Jeffery Jones admitted to having Child .Half past never. You know, Jeffery Jones, who played Chairman Clench, is a registered "you know what" offender who pleaded guilty to possessing child . I wonder if the trolls would pitch a fit about his return to Disney parks? :ROFLOL:
Clearly Disney doesn't care about these facts either because we have MJ being featured and praised for his role in Captain EO and Jeffery Jones still makes daily appearances as Chairman Clench in Alien Encounter: Invasion at Disney Quest.
Ok enough with the debate on Michael Jackson. Why can't we let the man be remembered for his music? Anyway, I saw EO today and it was great. I loved how they used the moving floor this time around. I'd say it added to the experience. They also had different lighting effects for EO...
Only because the complainants were paid off, er, I meant settled with... :brick:
That's not entirely true.
The first accuser's FATHER was paid, and if you read the court documents the allegations came from statements the child made while being DRUGGED in a shrink's office under his father's supervision (the father who committed suicide a few months after Michael's death). This never came to trial.
The second accuser got no money whatsoever, court statements show that had been trying to get money out of celebrities like George Lopez and Jay Leno in the past, and Michael was acquitted in the court of law.
All that said, in the court of public opinion, Michael Jackson is more popular now than he has been in several decades, which is why Disney is doing this. If any of it is true or not we will never know, but the public at large has certainly embraced him since his death and that is why we now have Captain Eo to visit on both coasts.
*for the record I could care less about what either of these two men have done in their personal lives and simply wanted to point out that just because they have a questionable past doesn't mean disney gives a S***
I said the same thing after I saw EO yesterday. I want my Alien Encounter back so bad! I went on stitch tonight and it just breaks my heart cause so little has changed from Alien Encounter. In a perfect world they could find a way to run both shows. Stitch in one chamber and Alien Encounter in the other. Everyone wins that way. Maybe if Kathy Najimy dies we can demand they bring back Alien Encounter as a tribute :lol:
I find it extremely distasteful and unfortunate that Disney is cashing in on the death of MJ and the publics obvious short attention span to his questionable morals.
If it wasn't for Disney's money-hungry accountants taking advantage of his unfaltering fan ban then they would have let this attraction remain in the land of forgotten attractions.
I kind of understood bringing it back to DL because of the local tie-in...but why Epcot? There is no local connection - the only connection is to money.
I still fail to see why I should care about what some celebrity has done? I would be more concerned about the everyday child predators who visit the park on a daily basis if I where you.This strikes me as an odd sentence is so many ways. In the first place, I consider it a bit unfortunate that you could NOT care less about their personal lives. Why wouldn't you concern yourself about the character of individuals Disney uses to promote its attractions or to feature in its theme parks? Why not have OJ Simpson play the flight attendant in the Soarin' pre-show? After all, he was acquitted of murder, and besides, what does it matter what he does in his personal life? Or maybe you're just saying that the sexual abuse of children is not really that big a deal to you.
As to the second half of the sentence, I think you're missing the point. Yes, it would appear that Disney does not "give a S***." That's precisely what troubles many of us about the decision to bring back a rusty old 3-D film that was unimpressive even when it was brand new as a tribute to this extremely odd, washed up, arguably criminal individual. Disney is ignoring principle for profit, yes. That's what bothers me. Thanks for stating the obvious.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.