brideck
Well-Known Member
Didn't see that one. It does look interesting. I guess her acting depends on the director.
see also: every actor ever -- some are just able to be really choosy about projects and therefore almost always look good
Didn't see that one. It does look interesting. I guess her acting depends on the director.
Spoken like someone who only watched her in Twilight and her Snow White movie…. Both her and Paterson has proven themselves to be quite remarkable actors in the independent worldYes. The whole house gets put in space. They encounter asteroids, an astronaut and have to fight off aliens. It stars Josh Hutcherson and Kristen Stewart.
They freeze Kristen Stewart. It's the most life like she has ever looked.
![]()
It's not uncommon for Disney.
But I'm sure most studios don't want to spend 350+ million on movies and do 3 reshoots.
They shot almost 3 movies worth of footage.
This is likely true for most actors. Lucas got Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman to all look like acting was a confusing concept they had never encountered.Didn't see that one. It does look interesting. I guess her acting depends on the director.
Agreed. We know that all three are far better actors then what we saw. Ewan can handle a crappy director and still make it look great. Portman needs that direction more.This is likely true for most actors. Lucas got Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman to all look like acting was a confusing concept they had never encountered.
Looks like there's going to be a lot of deleted posts soon.
Or people will move onto the next big movie and praise that one. And act like this movie never even existed.
Looks like there's going to be a lot of deleted posts soon.
It’s interesting how much acting ability can change from movie to movie, I thought Portman was horrible in Star Wars, was shocked at how good she was in Black Swan, and then disappointed again by Thor LAT.This is likely true for most actors. Lucas got Liam Neeson, Ewan McGregor and Natalie Portman to all look like acting was a confusing concept they had never encountered.
Perhaps I am older than you, but I was surprised at Portman’s acting in the prequels… I was excited when I found out she was cast… as I knew she could act since I first saw her in The ProfessionalIt’s interesting how much acting ability can change from movie to movie, I thought Portman was horrible in Star Wars, was shocked at how good she was in Black Swan, and then disappointed again by Thor LAT.
Makes me wonder if she phones in the action roles for the paycheck/recognition and does the more dramatic roles for the love of the profession.
It could be the material and the direction. Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are excellent actors but there was virtually nothing they could do with Twilight.It’s interesting how much acting ability can change from movie to movie, I thought Portman was horrible in Star Wars, was shocked at how good she was in Black Swan, and then disappointed again by Thor LAT.
Makes me wonder if she phones in the action roles for the paycheck/recognition and does the more dramatic roles for the love of the profession.
It could be the material and the direction. Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are excellent actors but there was virtually nothing they could do with Twilight.
It’s interesting how much acting ability can change from movie to movie, I thought Portman was horrible in Star Wars, was shocked at how good she was in Black Swan, and then disappointed again by Thor LAT.
Makes me wonder if she phones in the action roles for the paycheck/recognition and does the more dramatic roles for the love of the profession.
Looks like there's going to be a lot of deleted posts soon.
Or people will move onto the next big movie and praise that one. And act like this movie never even existed.
I’ve never excepted shills. They should be included whenever possible.I guess you'll only except shills then.
I don't know how many examples you guys need. You are lucky for this one. Since they didn't filmed in the U.K, they can hide the numbers. And you'll believe whatever they say for a budget.
But not so much with Snow White and a slew of others. Many of the past ones have already been unveiled.
I guess you'll only except shills then.
I don't know how many examples you guys need. You are lucky for this one. Since they didn't filmed in the U.K, they can hide the numbers. And you'll believe whatever they say for a budget.
But not so much with Snow White and a slew of others. Many of the past ones have already been unveiled.
Dr Strange 2 - 200 million (actual budget - 415 million)
Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania- 200 million (actual budget - 330 million)
The Marvels - 200 million (actual budget - 374 million)
"disconnected incoherent verbal diarrhea"I know I'm the only one who has a vendetta against this author at Forbes. I finally figured out what she is doing (beyond the incompetence piece).
There's massive self-plagerization involved. Her articles are made up of copy-pasting bits and pieces of other past articles. It's why they all read like disconnected incoherent verbal diarrhea.
Must be getting paid by the word. Pops out a new article every day with copy pasted passages. What a journalist.
Well you repeating the same thing over and over and over and over and over is certainly not going to convince us if it didn't the first time. So the question why do you continue to spout the same stuff over and over and over and over if we're not going to believe it?I guess you'll only except shills then.
I don't know how many examples you guys need. You are lucky for this one. Since they didn't filmed in the U.K, they can hide the numbers. And you'll believe whatever they say for a budget.
But not so much with Snow White and a slew of others. Many of the past ones have already been unveiled.
Dr Strange 2 - 200 million (actual budget - 415 million)
Antman and the Wasp: Quantumania- 200 million (actual budget - 330 million)
The Marvels - 200 million (actual budget - 374 million)
Simpler to copy/paste than actually do real reporting. Definition of just “phoning” it in for a paycheck.I know I'm the only one who has a vendetta against this author at Forbes. I finally figured out what she is doing (beyond the incompetence piece).
There's massive self-plagerization involved. Her articles are made up of copy-pasting bits and pieces of other past articles. It's why they all read like disconnected incoherent verbal diarrhea.
Must be getting paid by the word. Pops out a new article every day with copy pasted passages. What a journalist.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.