matt9112
Well-Known Member
The que is better than the ride honestly. At least with mermaid the ride isn’t absolutely crap even though the que there also blows you away.Yes its awful an absolute embarrassment
The que is better than the ride honestly. At least with mermaid the ride isn’t absolutely crap even though the que there also blows you away.Yes its awful an absolute embarrassment
The worst thing about being a DVC owner is DVC owners.Disney’s minimum wage increased to $15/hr in 2021. Ask any DVC owner, they can go on for days about the impact of wages on dues. And they do.
Maybe most of them….some of them were in crap malls. But really could get away with a big banger store in big city’s only in high end only retail locations.Closing Disney Stores was a smart thing.
¿que?The que is better than the ride honestly. At least with mermaid the ride isn’t absolutely crap even though the que there also blows you away.
Maybe.Maybe most of them….some of them were in crap malls. But really could get away with a big banger store in big city’s only in high end only retail locations.
Would you mind buying me a subscription to the WSJ so that I can read these?Disney’s Theme Parks Are Sore Spot for Investors, Too
While Disney’s streaming division has seen losses, the powerhouse parks division is also worrying Wall Street.www.wsj.com
Disney’s Robert Iger Faces Troubled Animation Market as ‘Strange World’ Bombs
“Strange World,” the entertainment company’s latest release, becomes its second straight animated flop, after “Lightyear.”www.wsj.com
Would you mind buying me a subscription to the WSJ so that I can read these?
It's hysterical to me. Chapek got canned for implementing Iger's streaming strategy. So they brought in Iger to fix it.Here's a NYT article:
"Investors now want to see old-fashioned profit in streaming."
"He [Iger] cannot simply continue on the path he laid out before he left, as the landscape has changed materially,” Richard Greenfield, a founder of the LightShed Partners research firm, wrote with two colleagues in a client note on Tuesday.
"Old-fashioned profit". How quaint. It's like the investors want Disney to make money or something.
It's hysterical to me. Chapek got canned for implementing Iger's streaming strategy. So they brought in Iger to fix it.
Wait, why don't we like the Lucasfilm Story Group? I thought the Lucasfilm Story Group was just Pablo Hidalgo and Leland Chee slapping novelists on the wrist when they try to do something that goes against established canon.My only comments on the Star Wars bruhaha - Kathleen Kennedy created the "Lucasfilm Story Group", hired Kiri Hart for it, and greenlit The Last Jedi. Those decisions alone should have resulted in her "spending more time with her family" years ago.
“Making money?” What a concept! Hey, wait, that’s what Bobby C. Wanted to do…… Nevermind."Old-fashioned profit". How quaint. It's like the investors want Disney to make money or something.
Iger did not have a reputation of micromanaging segment heads like Chapek, though any major project or change would have needed his sign off. Chapek was different as CEO because the pandemic provided the chances to make much larger changes and the company could use the parks to create new revenue streams as other divisions struggled.This is where I find it a bit hard to follow who is supposed to be responsible for what among executives. Chapek was head of the parks and then CEO during a period a lot of changes many people don't like were implemented at the parks, but in both positions he was apparently just implementing Iger's vision and never had much time as CEO to get out from under Iger anyway. So, now with Iger back the narrative is that we shouldn't feel too happy because he was ultimately responsible for the bad stuff that happened under Chapek rather than Chapek being a driving force for that in both positions. However, when Chapek was promoted to CEO and Josh D'Amaro became head of the parks, D'Amaro is supposed to be bad because he acts all nice and charming but in reality is just implementing Chapek/Iger's vision.
So, does the head of P&R really have much control over what happens in the division or is it mainly down to the CEO at the time?
It's hysterical to me. Chapek got canned for implementing Iger's streaming strategy. So they brought in Iger to fix it.
"Old-fashioned profit". How quaint. It's like the investors want Disney to make money or something.
Historically, most movies in a series see diminishing returns in B.O. There are definitely exceptions to this, but it's mostly what happens.Ep8 made significantly less money than Ep7. $1.3 billion worldwide compared to $2 billion of the previous one. Which might still seem like a lot of money to the general public, but the executives and investors were quite disappointed. Solo of course also contributed to the problem even prior. And then Ep9 further underperformed Ep8.
There's a town hall meeting for all employees at noon ET. Odds that anything newsworthy is announced are about 1,000-to-1.Isn't Bobby I. supposed to be releasing some info today?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.