SirLink
Well-Known Member
That's kind of a cop out excuse, though. "The Long Time Ago" opening was meant to establish Star Wars's fairy tale nature, not to be taken overly literal.
Yep - Jedi are Paladin knights, Ewoks are Fairies etc.
That's kind of a cop out excuse, though. "The Long Time Ago" opening was meant to establish Star Wars's fairy tale nature, not to be taken overly literal.
Tomorrowland is about looking to the future, and yes, I guess science fiction falls under that umbrella. However, Star Wars takes place "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away." It's called Tomorrowland, not Yesterdayland.
For Florida, the board of directors wanted something grand for their East Coast Disneyland...which in itself is something that Walt Disney only begrudgingly agreed to build in order to obtain board permission to build his EPCOT. The Magic Kingdom began as nothing more than a means to an end for Walt to get his futuristic city. The castle at MK is not what he wanted.
From what I gather from history, anyway. History doesn't really paint a very romantic picture of the beginnings of Walt Disney World.
Iron Man, actually all the Marvel characters are based out of current New York - so that doesn't fit. Your right Star Wars takes place a "long time ago in a galaxy far, far away" But here is the thing "a long time ago" from when is that message supposed to be set in now or the future itself.
I would take Star Wars in a heartbeat over having Wall-E/Buzz/Captain EO/etc.
That's kind of a cop out excuse, though. "The Long Time Ago" opening was meant to establish Star Wars's fairy tale nature, not to be taken overly literal.
"The Tomorrowland attractions have been designed to give you an opportunity to participate in adventures that are a living blueprint of our future." I don't see Darth Vader, Princess Leia, Chewbaca, using the force and anything else Star Wars as a window into our potential future. It's not a cop out, Star Wars doesn't fit the theme of Tomorrowland.
You're saying the "long time ago" part is there just to be there, basically?
That theme, to quote another "Star" franchise, is dead, Jim. You don't have to like it, but it's dead and gone and probably not coming back. The EPCOT version of Tomorrowland is not sustainable for Disney. And saying the Stark Expo, which focuses on COMPLETELY fictional pieces of technology is better than Star Wars is not helping your argument.
It's there to set a "fairy tale" setting, yes. nothing more.
When did Disney say they were abandoning this concept?
Maybe it's me, but Tomorrowland now becomes a whole land that is a licensed property and followed by a registered trademark logo. STARWARSLAND (R). Has a nice ring to it in the original park, eh? Ahem. My goodness, if they could make a dreaded original attraction. That would be sacrilegious to management today, though.
He didn't have to say that. Honestly, I'm thankful he did! It was a nice courtesy to let the fans know that indeed chefs are in kitchen cooking dinner and that us guests won't be left starving with nothing to eat!So Iger makes an announcement that he will some time in the future make an announcement... What a pompous ...
It's a reference to the fake working title of Return of the Jedi they created to throw people off the scent and not get overcharged on American location shooting."Speculation beyond imagination"...Imagination pavilion? "Project Orange Harvest"...Horizons??
Can someone bring Eisner back please... he invested at WDW.. lol
I am all for Disneyland getting love but they just got a massive park redo. We got an announcement 2 years ago and still nothing. I would imagine it would take 3-4 years to build Avatar. I honestly am not excited about Avatar.
I just like seeing the parks fresh and clean. Sometimes paint and new lightbulbs go a long way! ha
Eisner was against and tried to derail Disney's acquisition of Pixar. That would have been a catastrophically awful move for the company's future.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.