I don't think you can ban all guns, but I always wonder why the NRA is against stricker rules for gun purchases I mean it's tougher to buy a car! And their against things like making it mandatory that a person report a stolen gun? Also, does anyone need to own a high caliber assult rifle or an uzi? And before someone jumps down my throat and say it's their right to arms and what ever those arms may be should be respected....does that mean I can own a nuclear warhead? Because if we wanna get literal with interpretation then it would be my right.
PS- As for colored guns, I think it's as long as they have painted tips but it would be wierd to make the whole gun some wierd color. They are flint lock...but even those can hurt!
http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-now-reenactment.s29,0,4793357.story
This is an argument that is often cited by folks who don't own guns. Automatic weapons are illegal in most states, and in the ones where they aren't, they extremely hard to obtain legally.
If someone is a law abiding citizen, why shouldn't they be allowed to own a high capacity semi automatic rifle? I own a number of firearms and have never injured anyone. And before anyone calls me a "gun nut" I'm actually in a profession that helps heal people, go figure. I believe that good people follow laws and bad guys don't. It doesn't follow that because you can legally own a gun you should be allowed to own a nuclear warhead --I don't think that it can be used for self defense or just for fun for plinking.
My intent starting this thread was not to debate gun ownership, just that it is sad that society has devolved over the decades where children's toys must now be identified as children's toys due the rise in crime.