SpectreJordan
Well-Known Member
Really? There's not a single impressive animatronic on that ride. The 'Under the Sea' scene is incredibly basic too. But they must've blown their budget somewhere.I'm still fully convinced that they blew most of the budget on the animatronics and facade, then ran out of money by the time they were doing the penultimate scenes. The plywood cutout Ursula in the climax just screams that.
That's such an odd ride. If it didn't cost so much, it would've been a fine addition just as a smaller ride. But it cost a ton & it's not very good.
I'm gonna assume they think people are coming to WDW no matter what & it's the other parks that need unique rides to attract guests. That's a frustrating way of thinking but I guess I can see the logic there.Both Mermaid and SDMT were lifted attractions from other parks plans (DCA and SDL).
It's the classic problem that often things aren't conceived originally for WDW (often in recent history), which is odd, considering its prominence in the portfolio.
Heck, if we even go for a reverse situation like Frozen Ever After in HKDL, they expanded the track, the run time, the animatronics and the spacing of the show scenes. WDW just takes DCA's Little Mermaid that was shoehorned into an existing building. Even MMRR got reconfigured for DLR. But it seems since WDW has 'the space', they often don't through the effort of reconfiguring things for it.
Not that I think Tron or Ratatouille were horrible choices, but they are again puzzle pieces from other parks shoved into wherever they happen to fit. Tron ironically I think suffers way less sight line intrusions in MK, simply because it is tucked away.
Atleast these Beyond BTM & South America ideas seem to be original additions, if the rumor of Indy not being a port is true.
Last edited: