Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
Open several bars around the Magic Kingdom and folks can "Drink around the Kingdom"Open up a themed bar at MK, watch the money roll in and finance the expansions with it.
Hey it works for EPCOT
Open several bars around the Magic Kingdom and folks can "Drink around the Kingdom"Open up a themed bar at MK, watch the money roll in and finance the expansions with it.
This unfortunately is incorrect. The multibillion dollar conglomerate has to show a profit too; otherwise it'll be gobbled up by a bigger conglomerate that *will* show a profit.This is unfortunately is not the correct mindset. Magic Kingdom will ALWAYS be the most visited park. Nothing they ever add to another park will pull attendance from MK. They need to reopen existing capacity (like SGE) and expand the park, it needs the capacity. It’s that simple. We’re also talking about a multibillion dollar conglomerate, expanding in MK doesn’t mean they can’t expand in Epcot, or DAK.
This is a very black and white statement. What I said is true. They CAN afford to do it and show profitability. However they’re loosing billions on D+.This unfortunately is incorrect. The multibillion dollar conglomerate has to show a profit too; otherwise it'll be gobbled up by a bigger conglomerate that *will* show a profit.
That's true. Black and white. TWDC is barely in the black, not doing well because of the D+ investment and ESPN's reduction in profits (and other things, but that's 1 & 2). Because of this, they can't go and spend billions (more) on theme parks. D+ might eventually look like a wise investment - but we're not there yet. It could work out, and start printing cash, or it could lead to the downfall of Disney itself. ...and that's life in a multi-billion dollar conglomerate.This is a very black and white statement. What I said is true. They CAN afford to do it and show profitability. However they’re loosing billions on D+.
I mean maybe in some Disney Parks blog post they might have described it as an E ticket. I don’t think anyone seriously ever considered it an E at any point.
I'm still fully convinced that they blew most of the budget on the animatronics and facade, then ran out of money by the time they were doing the penultimate scenes. The plywood cutout Ursula in the climax just screams that.It cost $100+ million.
just thinking out loud but that is what worries me about tiana, all this outside redo and then maybe less substance inside...same with frozen, all that money they spent on redesigning the front of the pavilion and then ended up with a sparse ride inside,,,it just wasn't necessary that way. Comparing apples to oranges I know, but looking at this rainforest they are adding to splash and all the other changes I just hope they dont run out for the show/ride itself.I'm still fully convinced that they blew most of the budget on the animatronics and facade, then ran out of money by the time they were doing the penultimate scenes. The plywood cutout Ursula in the climax just screams that.
Even Be Our Guest, which opened to some acclaim, has fallen off. And I don't think the interior is especially impressive -- the West Wing is better, but the centerpiece ballroom doesn't really work because it feels like you're eating in a cafeteria.
I personally think NFL is still much better than Toy Story Land both from a content standpoint and a use of space/design standpoint, but it's a major disappointment nonetheless.
I completely disagree. A theater that can pull 1000-3000 guests off the streets per hour is huge. It wouldn't be a driver of attendance but it would be a big capacity boost. As @wdrive stated, Magic Kingdom needs non-headliner attractions that can accommodate a lot of guests. Something on par with Fantasy Springs addition coming to DisneySea would solve quite a few of Magic Kingdom's problems. That being said, it's not unrealistic to say that Beyond Big Thunder could essentially solve this problem as well.
That’s not how it works.I'm still fully convinced that they blew most of the budget on the animatronics and facade, then ran out of money by the time they were doing the penultimate scenes. The plywood cutout Ursula in the climax just screams that.
FTFY - both attractions were originally conceived on a bigger scope than what was ultimately built.Little Mermaid and Seven Dwarfs are E-tickets that ended up being D-tickets.
It can handle 2000 per hour. But only 1000 per hour get on.Honestly @MisterPenguin, @doctornick is correct here. A couple more 2000 guest per hour attractions spread out in MK would help tremendously.
Only the Palace of Fine Arts rotunda outside was kept. The Golden Dreams theater itself was torn down and a new showbuilding was built for The Little Mermaid.WDW just takes DCA's Little Mermaid that was shoehorned into an existing building.
Really? There's not a single impressive animatronic on that ride. The 'Under the Sea' scene is incredibly basic too. But they must've blown their budget somewhere.I'm still fully convinced that they blew most of the budget on the animatronics and facade, then ran out of money by the time they were doing the penultimate scenes. The plywood cutout Ursula in the climax just screams that.
I'm gonna assume they think people are coming to WDW no matter what & it's the other parks that need unique rides to attract guests. That's a frustrating way of thinking but I guess I can see the logic there.Both Mermaid and SDMT were lifted attractions from other parks plans (DCA and SDL).
It's the classic problem that often things aren't conceived originally for WDW (often in recent history), which is odd, considering its prominence in the portfolio.
Heck, if we even go for a reverse situation like Frozen Ever After in HKDL, they expanded the track, the run time, the animatronics and the spacing of the show scenes. WDW just takes DCA's Little Mermaid that was shoehorned into an existing building. Even MMRR got reconfigured for DLR. But it seems since WDW has 'the space', they often don't through the effort of reconfiguring things for it.
Not that I think Tron or Ratatouille were horrible choices, but they are again puzzle pieces from other parks shoved into wherever they happen to fit. Tron ironically I think suffers way less sight line intrusions in MK, simply because it is tucked away.
I think the Ursula’s pretty impressive but u guess that’s just meReally? There's not a single impressive animatronic on that ride. The 'Under the Sea' sign is incredibly basic too. But they must've blown their budget somewhere.
I think that is where the budget was blown on that ride. Reminds me of NRJ. One main AA is fantastic. The rest of the ride is blah.I think the Ursula’s pretty impressive but u guess that’s just me
I think that is where the budget was blown on that ride. Reminds me of NRJ. One main AA is fantastic. The rest of the ride is blah.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.