News 'Beyond Big Thunder Mountain' Blue Sky concept revealed for Magic Kingdom

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
I definitely wouldn't be on board for Hocus Pocus, seems like a cheap IP to use in the parks, but Sleepy Hollow would be absolutely perfect. Ditto for Villain Kingdom.
Hocus Pocus 2 broke every streaming record at the time of its premiere, and the original trailed not far behind - it's a dark horse property for Disney, but its popularity has been growing since the 90s and gets higher every year - which they've noticed given that's the complete inverse of the usual trend. Movies tend to make them less and less money as time goes on instead of more, and even more rare is one that makes them significantly more like Hocus Pocus does.

I wouldn't expect a full year-round attraction at MK (not that I think they're even considering any sort of attraction - and not that I'd complain if they were!), but I can't see how it would hurt if they built the Sanderson Sisters Cottage along the path from Liberty Square to Villains Land, even if they only opened it seasonally. It would be an absolute smash during the Halloween Parties for sure - as would anything Sleepy Hollow, and as will whatever Villains Land turns out to be. If they can lean into that it seems like that would be a smart decision.
 
Last edited:

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Posting this in the appropritate thread:View attachment 710330
According to this rumor, New Orleans would take over the western side of Frontierland, and Liberty Square would manifest its destiny westward. Big Thunder Mountian would be absorbed into a new joint land with Coco, which would transition to a more forested Encanto area before entering a villain's land that would terminate at Haunted Mansion.

Perfectly, this sounds like a perfect plan to me and the perfect execution of the overarching idea.

Very excited now, especially since this seems to be far less blue sky than previously suggested.

Additional useful post to help visualize the space, especially with how big it is:


Considering it’s literally an option I had already shown months ago, I’d say it’s legitimate.
 

GhostHost1000

Premium Member
I personally think the "Disney shouldn't invest more in MK without investing more in the other parks" narrative needs to go. It's been discussed a million times, but there is not a single thing in the world that will draw guests away from MK to the other 3 parks, MK needs more capacity. Over at DAK, they're planning the Moana/Zootopia thing, and hopefully further expansion comes to DHS in the somewhat near future. Ultimately, any expansions/new attractions are a win for Disney fans like us.

I think "DAK at night" unfortunately died with Rivers of Light, when/if they further expand the park, maybe they'll revisit a nighttime show to keep guests there. Right now, I don't know if it would even be worth it. Personally, I don't think I've ever stayed at DAK longer than 4-5pm. Especially with the Park Reservations/hopping, I usually book DAK, ride FOP, and Everest, maybe see FOTLK, grab a drink at Nomad Lounge and hop to my next park.
Also keep in mind more capacity and new things at MK will likely mean more people in the MK at times as well

I kinda wish they would built villiansland at Hollywood studios. They could then have different Halloween style parties there in addition to MK for MNSSHP

If they build more family rides at AK and have a really exciting night show (with more than 1 showing) you might have something there to draw people at night too
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
Also keep in mind more capacity and new things at MK will likely mean more people in the MK at times as well
Totally true, but I don’t think it would be anything extremely substantial.
I kinda wish they would built villiansland at Hollywood studios. They could then have different Halloween style parties (maybe even year round) there in addition to MK for MNSSHP
I agree with you here. Kind of surprised they haven’t thought of the potential uncharge events they could have at DHS with a fully fleshed out Villainsland. Same could be said for MK though, they could have Halloween/Villains parties in the months that there aren’t MNSSHP & MVMCP. Lots of possibilities
 

BlakeW39

Well-Known Member
Hocus Pocus 2 broke every streaming record at the time of its premiere, and the original trailed not far behind - it's a dark horse property for Disney, but its popularity has been growing since the 90s and gets higher every year - which they've noticed given that's the complete inverse of the usual trend. Movies tend to make them less and less money as time goes on instead of more, and even more rare is one that makes them significantly more like Hocus Pocus does.

I wouldn't expect a full year-round attraction at MK (not that I think they're even considering any sort of attraction - and not that I'd complain if they were!), but I can't see how it would hurt if they built the Sanderson Sisters Cottage along the path from Liberty Square to Villains Land, even if they only opened it seasonally. It would be an absolute smash during the Halloween Parties for sure - as would anything Sleepy Hollow, and as will whatever Villains Land turns out to be. If they can lean into that it seems like that would be a smart decision.

A cheesy 90's kid's Halloween film? Whose quality essentially amounts to what one could find on Disney Channel in 2013? There's no doubting the second was a success on D+, but— and not to sound like a jerk —if I saw the IP plastered over a Disney theme park I'd probably cringe to death.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
A cheesy 90's kid's Halloween film? Whose quality essentially amounts to what one could find on Disney Channel in 2013? There's no doubting the second was a success on D+, but— and not to sound like a jerk —if I saw the IP plastered over a Disney theme park I'd probably cringe to death.
It's already a major component of the Spelltacular, and people love it.
 

mattpeto

Well-Known Member
I think that's been discussed by a lot of people. I mean they weren't gonna open Tiana in frontierland
I don’t recall seeing an insider saying the Southern part of Frontierland was going to change (and why), but it is hip to dislike him in the community, I get it.

One of the things he mentions matches up something I heard back from D23. That doesn’t make it true, but it does support his story.
 

BlakeW39

Well-Known Member
I don’t recall seeing an insider saying the Southern part of Frontierland was going to change (and why), but it is hip to dislike him in the community, I get it.

One of the things he mentions matches up something I heard back from D23. That doesn’t make it true, but it does support his story.

Why's it hip to dislike Mickey Views?
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Gotcha, I had made this more spread out + ambitious layout for the lands so that may have been why I got that response. Closing Villains Land at night would definitelyView attachment 710354 not be ideal.
This goes into my removal of small world as well, but I'd position it with a path from Fantasyland, a path from the left of Mansion and a path from Thunder. It would require re-routing or even filling in part of the Rivers of America, taking out a significant chunk of Tom Sawyer Island and relocating It's a small world and maybe Pinocchio's.

What's far more likely is the non-Fantasyland related stuff, but Fantasyland connecting to a Villains land would lend itself to something like Fire Mountain being a bridge attraction between the lands.
 

SoFloMagic

Well-Known Member
I don’t recall seeing an insider saying the Southern part of Frontierland was going to change (and why), but it is hip to dislike him in the community, I get it.

One of the things he mentions matches up something I heard back from D23. That doesn’t make it true, but it does support his story.
I don't feel cool for disliking him. Nor do I dislike him. But I do think it's hilarious to present this as massive news.

But, again... The only part of this that's really "new" is the idea that the country bears will be going creole. If that's true, he'll earn my respect.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
A cheesy 90's kid's Halloween film? Whose quality essentially amounts to what one could find on Disney Channel in 2013? There's no doubting the second was a success on D+, but— and not to sound like a jerk —if I saw the IP plastered over a Disney theme park I'd probably cringe to death.

You'd cringe to death if you saw a spooky old house like this built back in the woods along the Rivers of America on your way to Villains Land? 🤨

1681525195963.png


It's fine if you dislike the property - I love the first one and disagree with your assessment that it's essentially a cheesy DCOM (however the second, despite its best intentions, was disappointing and does fall pretty squarely into that category) - but there's some solid production design in that first that could translate well to a park offering. The architecture of the house completely vibes with Liberty Square, and some sort of enhanced Meet and Greet like Enchanted Tales where the environment comes alive alongside the characters' appearance could be a great little B or C Ticket diversion.

Again, I don't imagine Disney is actually giving any thought to this. But The Sanderson Sisters' Castle Stage Show during the Halloween Parties is already massively popular, I think it would be well recieved if they gave them another place to make an appearance.
 

Elijah Abrams

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
Yes
What could they even do for a "New Frontierland" at this point? Disney doesn't have any popular "western" IPs, and the chances of Iger's Disney greenlighting a non-IP based attraction are pretty small...
They could move (and/or build new versions of) Pecos Bill Inn, Westward Ho, the Diamond Horseshoe, Big Al's, Golden Oak Outpost, the Trading Post, and the Shootin' Arcade to a "New Frontierland" that is in the "beyond Big Thunder" area, along with putting in Villains land, but I think an Encanto land should go in either Epcot or Animal Kingdom, and a Coco expansion of Epcot's Mexico pavilion should happen. Please remember that Bob Iger is only CEO of Disney again for two years per his contract, and two years from 2022, which was when Iger returned, is 2024. A new ideology for Disney could be made under Iger’s replacement that would involve more on creativity than "IP greed".
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom