aleh021
Member
I think it mainly has to do with OLC being the ones who release this information first, followed up by Disney. In due time OLC will share all the details about the rides and an opening date I hope.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Avengers Campus: E-Watch! (Waiting on the new ride)
- Thread starter MisterPenguin
- Start date
I think it mainly has to do with OLC being the ones who release this information first, followed up by Disney. In due time OLC will share all the details about the rides and an opening date I hope.
SweetDuffy101
Well-Known Member
I wonder on How long can Disney Actually Use this technology to other parks, With OLC having exclusivity contracts per attraction/show/product with WDI.
Architectural Guinea Pig
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Reminds me of the Zootopia ride vehicles -
Ngl it would be cool if they made the entire floor the screen so that it would seem like flying.
Ngl it would be cool if they made the entire floor the screen so that it would seem like flying.
D.Silentu
Well-Known Member
(Reposting, as this also belongs here)
AJFireman
Well-Known Member
I was on Marvel Insider collecting points for no reason and there is a high resolution image of this. The "balding man" is a person with a headband looking forward.
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
Lol wow! Thanks for sharing
TheDisneyParksfanC8
Active Member
OG55 mentioned this in a recent video, but if they let it slip and Avatar is indeed DCA bound considering how Disney spaces out additions to their parks, the Avengers E ticket could either put on ice again or dead in its current form again. The MCU has been going through a downturn while Avatar 2 made bank at the box office and has several sequels lined up. Disney you can bet Disney wants to strike while the irons hot.
Maybe they are also concerns about how the Multiverse concept will fare over time considering the overall mediocre reception to the Multiverse saga. Maybe they want to wait and see how well the X-Men do and incorporate them into the ride in a big way or redevelop the Multiverse attraction the X-Men. Maybe Disney feels something based around the X-Men would be more timeless.
Maybe they are also concerns about how the Multiverse concept will fare over time considering the overall mediocre reception to the Multiverse saga. Maybe they want to wait and see how well the X-Men do and incorporate them into the ride in a big way or redevelop the Multiverse attraction the X-Men. Maybe Disney feels something based around the X-Men would be more timeless.
TheDisneyParksfanC8
Active Member
Considering by the time this opens, I will bet it will have elements incorporated from the sequels with rides totally unique to DLR.
Architectural Guinea Pig
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
At this point they should just change it to spiderverse (which is much more popular now by too much) and scrap webs slingers and replace it with avengers. Then we still get a multiverse e ticket and the near-trash web slingers can nap in Yesterland.
Professortango1
Well-Known Member
I'd be open to them updating Soarin' into FOP as I have always openly stated that Soarin' feels like a proof of concept rather than a full attraction. Still not sure how Avatar fits the park though.
TheDisneyParksfanC8
Active Member
To tie into Way of Water maybe the Avatar land at DCA will have totally different attractions to set it apart from WDW's. I would be open to that.
truecoat
Well-Known Member
Soarin and FOP are the same in a way that BTMR and Space Mountain are the same.
milordsloth
Well-Known Member
I don't know, I think FoP and Soarin are way too similar. That was the main reason I feel like I was so underwhelmed when I finally got to experience FoP. I really don't think we need 2 of that style ride in the same park, and would rather have something original here in CA.
Last edited:
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
True to an extent but I think the reason that perception exists is because simulators like Soarin and FOP don’t move in physical space past sets. When it comes to the ride experience the majority of the difference between those two rides is what’s being projected on the screen. Unlike Space Mountain/ BTMRR and POTC/ IASW that are vastly different experiences even though they share the same ride system. It’s why many people feel that 2 shooters or two simulators in the same park are redundant. Somewhere subconsciously it’s like we feel we’re just changing the channel on the TV as opposed to enjoying a completely different experience. Ultimately it comes down to the fact that we haven’t “bought in” on simulators/ screen rides the same way we do on rides that immerse you with physical props/ sets pieces/ AA’s etc.
Last edited:
Professortango1
Well-Known Member
I agree. Soarin' feels like the proof of concept for FOP. I can't imagine going on FOP and then queueing up for Soarin' to ride a bare bones IMAX Museum Movie version.
truecoat
Well-Known Member
Yet one of them has much longer lines.
milordsloth
Well-Known Member
That's not really relevant to whether we need both very similar types of ride in one park.
