Can't say I'm excited to hear this. I didn't enjoy the film at all and found it to be ridiculously over hyped. I'd much rather see them develop in-house properties, though I suppose this must make business sense at some level.
I was wondering where you have been… earlier today actually.
Ahh the good ole days of visiting KSC and Langley Air and Space before sitting in classrooms learning how the rocket engines work and the fuel flows/combusts within them. As well as the the fun times at The Smithsonian looking at items used in settling the west prior to being educated in the Western Plains Indian War.
This land is exactly what Disney needs. The success of animal's natural lives correlate directly to conservation of the wild. Good addition, Disney!
I would love, LOVE to have Doctor Who in the parks.
The only concern I would have there is having to swap out the Doctor on a fairly regular basis.
It's ironic that the same people slamming the project would be the same ones up in arms with Disney if Universal announced it... :brick: hypocrites.
Exactly! I'm didn't see Avatar and really don't plan to. However, I know James work and he doesn't do anything half ______. Anyone that loves quality, detail and leading edge technology will surely enjoy this new land. James is what Disney once was.This is something I am really excited about. He could really bring something to the table with this and perhaps help push the boundaries beyond what we have seen before.
From the mouths of babes...
My 10 year-old daughter loves the parks and is constantly asking when we'll go again. She's also a little bit of a sci-fi geek: loves Star Wars, the Clone Wars series, watches Doctor Who (when the episodes are appropriate) and even the original series of Star Trek. She likes fantasy: Harry Potter and the Lord of the Rings are high on her list.
I told her about this, and she was very excited ... until she realized I didn't mean "Avatar: The Last Airbender."
Her reaction was not disappointment, but more like disgust: "The one with the blue people? Yeah, I don't ever want to see that."
When I told her about the original plan for Beastly Kingdomme, she got really excited at that idea.
For those who think I may have influenced her reactions, you obviously don't have children. I even tried to sound excited about the idea. She wasn't buying it.
Once the initial shock wore off, I'm pretty excited about the prospects of this addition.
You have to give it to Disney though for some how finding a way to keep this under wraps . I don't recall this ever being seriously discussed on the forums.
For some reason seeing this in the flesh was memorable.
Entertainment should not be an excuse to turn education into infotainment, IMHO of course.
And while I may understand the need for conservation I dont feel it should be an excuse to be submissive to the Panzer Division of the green tree hugging Junta.
So is it not apprpriate for people to have alternate views? Some people like it, some people don't, and all for valid reasons. In a democratic society, is this not valid? Besides, if we all had the same views, there wouldn't be much to discuss.
I think it will be well done as are most Disney attractions, I just don't think it fits thematically, also like many Disney attractions nowadays.
I just wish it that would get done before 2017...Something worth pointing out to a lot of you who are concerned about the "fit" with DAK. If this thing turns out to be an absolute stunning attraction, which it could very well be with the talent involved, you are not going to care that its connection to Animal Kingdom is a stretch. This is the direction they are going, so we have to embrace that and look forward to some big investment into Animal Kingdom. Today is very good news in my opinion.
At least we're keeping this to an intellectual conversation.
I just wish it that would get done before 2017...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.