EPCOT Robot
Member
I registered just to say SunsetLambert is really losing this argument. LOL.
Umm ok...so the haunted mansion theme fits in with Liberty Square how?
I wasn't in love with it, but I can acknowledge that there's a difference between:
1. A land focused on mythological Earth creatures that at one time people (living on Earth) believed also lived on the Earth, and
2. A land focused on a fictional planet that has nothing to do with Earth.
I still think the Beastly Kingdom concept could be made to work, but now they'd have to incorporate it in the park by adding single attraction to the other lands (like the Yeti in Asia) rather than having a singular BK land.
But would it kill em to occasionally increase the budget. And I mean increase it BIG TIME. Not just for overtures and unexpected costs but to create something so unfathomably unique and mind blowing that it will redefine the theme park industry as we know it. Rewrite the playbook. Imagine the final product being far superior to what the concept art looks like. Not the other way around.
Except the last park at Walt Disney World committed to a strong and distinct vision that made it unique.Agree
We re getting an incredibly beautiful land while losing nothing
Except the last park at Walt Disney World committed to a strong and distinct vision that made it unique.
According to this thread, everyone loves Avatar Land.
Yes, that's why they are building Avatar Land. It has a unique and strong vision. According to this thread, everyone loves Avatar Land. I guess if some people don't and still want to talk about a proposed expansion project that was canceled a decade a go, you can go to your local grocer and purchase Haterade to wash down your sour grapes.
According to this thread, everyone loves Avatar Land.
Agree
We re getting an incredibly beautiful land while losing nothing
And I think that on that happy, happy day that he leaves Disney, this project will be quietly shelved.
As much as I hate Avatar, I hope that it doesn't get shelved. DAK desperately needs something like this at this point, not to mention the nighttime elements look promising. I just hope they create something with actual substance this time, I'm looking at you FLE.
The backside of Everest, I presume.
With the exception of tours like that though, most guests would not ever see the backside of Splash Mountain. Pretty much any guest can see the backside of Everest however. It is actually the first thing you see of the park when you enter the parking lot for Animal Kingdom and is easily visible to all who just look over to it.The backside of Everest, I presume.
Having taken the KTTK tour, I can tell you this looks better than the backside of Splash.
FLE has more substance than anything based on Cameron's preachy snoozefest could ever have. It features characters people love and remember, and stories that have stood the test of time. Avatar has none of that. I'd take Dumbo's Circus over Cameron's kitty carnival any day.
Yes, because we all know Song of the South was a huge, recent hit in 1992 when Splash Mountain opened.........Im for the land, but if this really does open in 2017, no one will really care. By that time the movie will be around 8 years old...
Just because the movie wasnt "good" doesnt mean it wont make a good theme park attraction/land...Just because the movie was profitable does not make it good.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.