• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Announced: Mary Poppins Attraction in UK Pavilion

Cesar R M

Well-Known Member
Doesn't seem that way to me. Seems to be startlingly high budgets where the funds aren't allocated correctly.
Costs now seems to be a battering ram for PR BS. "look how much we spent in this attraction, you better enjoy it!"
Similar to how people shove real actors in big marketing on the animated movie attractions while pretty much shunning voice actors (exactly what Robin Williams feared since Aladdin )
 

WDW Pro

Well-Known Member
I tend to agree - I enjoy Spider-Man and respect how innovative it was, but I rode both Spider-Man and Indiana Jones at Disneyland for the first time within a month of each other and I was WAY more impressed by Jones. It takes all the best elements of a simulator and runs it through a practical environment.

Ratatouille would be much improved by having some EMV features within the vehicle - that lack of a motion base in the ride vehicle really hurts it when you're parked in front of a screen and meant to believe you're careening through the kitchen. Even some light pitch and yaw would do wonders. But I'll stop there, since my criticism of Rat goes much further and I'm just gonna derail the thread.



To whom do I make out the Human Sacrifice in order to make THIS happen? If we're meant to finally get a Mary Poppins Attraction, something like this is really the form it should take. I'm sure the Double-Decker Carousel would have been nice enough, but Mary deserves better than another bunted spinner.
No human sacrifice needed... but you couldn't ask for a better earnings report if you're hoping to see projects revived. Capacity, capacity, capacity, right?


Began life as a dark ride when the theme was changed from Brave.

Then a “flat” ride

Then a “spinning” ride.

Got so far as backstage survey markers.
Survey markers were for the two-level carousel.
 

TikibirdLand

Well-Known Member
No human sacrifice needed... but you couldn't ask for a better earnings report if you're hoping to see projects revived. Capacity, capacity, capacity, right?



Survey markers were for the two-level carousel.
Or the markers could be for the additional food booths needed :cool:
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Doesn't seem that way to me. Seems to be startlingly high budgets where the funds aren't allocated correctly.
Correct…but isn’t it part of the “carousel of dysfunction” that plagued the whole operation?
1. Overblown announcement on a ridiculous timeline
2. Big budget to impress people
3. “We’re not really spending that much…shhhhh”’to the investors
4. WDI starts spending/blowing budget
5. Cuts start almost immediately for design/construction
6. Budget blown. WDI leak onto fan boards to vent “sorta out in the open”
7. 7 years later…overhyped…”something” opens.
8. It underdelivers…PR isn’t alerted
9. Not enough stuff gets built
10. WDI disgruntled
11. Customers disgruntled
12. Travel agents put up memes advertising how “amazing” the “experience” is.
13. Comcast takes shots on its Twitter feed
14. Repeat steps 1-13
I'm not sure it made it far enough into development to determine the screen content. The idea was to have half the Carousel open-air and then half (or perhaps a third, don't remember) in the building with the screens. Content would be different over time, and it was pitched this would reflect positively on Mary Poppins' live action - animation hybrid style in ride form. There was another concept that had the horses leaving the carousel (which would have been faux) via multi-lane tracks to go into a show building hidden by residential home facades, but I think that was dismissed for costs.
Dude…none of that is happening. They just dangled a carrot so the diehards would talk about it/create buzz…then ate the carrot as soon as nobody was watching 🥕
 
Last edited:

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
Sad but true....Imagine the simplicity of leaving the Communicore buildings in place, repurposing the Innovations show building as the new event "World Celebration" space, Tear down the World Showplace tent to allow expansion for a proper Mary Poppins attraction and even have room for a Harrods Style food hall.
Reorganize the space between the Comminicore buildings with new fountain and landscaping and save millions of dollars while having a much better guest experience...
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
Sad but true....Imagine the simplicity of leaving the Communicore buildings in place, repurposing the Innovations show building as the new event "World Celebration" space, Tear down the World Showplace tent to allow expansion for a proper Mary Poppins attraction and even have room for a Harrods Style food hall.
Reorganize the space between the Comminicore buildings with new fountain and landscaping and save millions of dollars while having a much better guest experience...

That was 100% what I wanted. Have 4 buildings - one shopping (Creations), one food (Connections), one festival/event center and one attraction (I would have voted to bring One Man's Dream to Epcot, being anchored out front with Dreamer's Point). And they could have even retrofitted the Festival one to have a rooftop bar to view the show.

They could have easily added a JoW-type space behind OMD with that money saved, and I think it would have created a much, much more cohesive theme and approach.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
That was 100% what I wanted. Have 4 buildings - one shopping (Creations), one food (Connections), one festival/event center and one attraction (I would have voted to bring One Man's Dream to Epcot, being anchored out front with Dreamer's Point). And they could have even retrofitted the Festival one to have a rooftop bar to view the show.

They could have easily added a JoW-type space behind OMD with that money saved, and I think it would have created a much, much more cohesive theme and approach.
Exactly... I would add to that moving the Carousel Of Progress to the One Man's Dream exhibit with the original finale scene...
A whole section on Walt and the World's Fair... And what if Dreamer's Point also featured an expander version of the Tower of the Winds...
So much could have been done to have kept the flavor of the park while accenting and adding...Even the new areas...Like World Nature/ World Celebration could have worked better with the central core still in place to define World Nature...Or I think anyway. The concept of EPCOT was not a throwaway... It just needed to be updated in a meaningful way (well that is my opinion anyway)
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Somebody can probably post one of those maps with the Epcot expansion plots to show the pads?

one was taken by millennium village…so they would likely have had to go behind the IG?

There's .8 acres for the undeveloped part of UK (orange below). And another .8 acres if they take over BoH.

1644620560503.png


For comparison:
  • MK Carousel - .12 acres
  • Peter Pan - .31 acres
  • Winnie the Pooh - .44 acres
  • Buzz - .55 acres
  • Main building of Little Mermaid ride - .55 acres
  • Ratatouille - 1.25 acres
  • Haunted Mansion - 1.8 acres
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom