No one is saying they should "eradicate all" of anything.
It's dramatics like this that are why environmental and ecological issues are often not taken seriously, or why so many people just roll their eyes and dismiss it all as hippy-dippy bullcrap.
Well, if you are so educated on animal issues, you know that citing those numbers isn't really valid when you take into account that the habituation of them is only getting worse. This is a particular problem that Disney has, as they basically created a country club for them with the SSL. And given Disney uses professionals to get rid of them, I don't think there is any danger of them being confused with American crocs. So since no one is saying to eradicate the species, and Disney isn't in any danger of getting rid of the wrong ones, I'm not quite sure who your rant is supposed to apply to.
Statements like this
There’s too many alligators in Florida. Let them trap as many as possible.
Re-read my post. I clearly stated why hunters are licensed. And yes, those numbers are valid. 23 deaths over 69 years is insignificant when compared to other dangers with higher death rates.
There were 34 shark attacks in Florida last year - Florida leads in the number of attacks. Should we start hunting sharks to reduce their numbers? Because certain species have already been decimated due to hunting and harvesting for food/medicine.
The return of the American alligator from near extinction is one of the successes of the ESA. But as with many large, efficient predators, as humans continue to encroach on theur habitat, conflicts will increase. And after a tragedy like what happened at Disney, I've read too many calls to get rid of alligators.