"Remember how easy it was to learn your abc's?"-:brick:
"The ancient Greeks were great inventors of the future!"- !?
"Books it seems, were just the beginning."- I don't know why, this just screams simpleton to me.
"A language not spoken by humans, but by computers"-Thank you, I had no idea, even though there are huge computers all around me right now.
I'm sorry, I feel like the script is an insult to my intelligence.
Most of those quotes are transitioning us into the next scene - "setting the stage for what's to come" so-to-speak. Something the previous incarnation never did. Look--cavemen. Great. Now here are the Egyptians. Suddenly we've been magically transported to the Phoenicians. No explanation as to why. And it just goes on-and-on. Disjointed, random scenes. The new script ties each one together, and if we're going to discuss Communication OR Innovation, how one thing influences another is KEY to understanding. The new script excels with this.
As far as the line about computers goes -- do you not realize that the fact we invented BRAND NEW LANGUAGES is not relevant? Irons talked about the development of language, and that's not dumb, but talk about the development of a computer language is? That's rather hypocritical.
How exactly is your intelligence insulted? Isn't the point of an education to help you make connections between seemingly disconnected items? To question, discover, explore, and understand? Are you insulted if a professor starts discussing causes-and-effects in a class?
I'm sorry, but I have to say something here. Even though this is my first post, I've been lurking around this thread forever. First off gustaftp, Jeremy Iron's script doesn't refer to Rome building the first world wide web. The 2007 version is the one that includes this horrible line. Irons' script read, "The mighty Roman empire bridged three continents with a vast system of roads- the fastest information highways the world had ever known. East, west, north, and south- all roads led to Rome." Much more articulate and memorable IMHO. The new line is, "Rome built the first world wide web, and it's leading us into the future." Not only is this dumbed down, it's horribly structured. Half the sentence is in past tense and half is in future tense. You may be a communications major, but any 5th grade English student knows what's wrong with that sentence.
I agree, that sentence is horribly structured. I'm not going to lie there. But it's not dumbed down. However, you are missing the point the new script is trying to make about how what Rome did is still very much important to today's society.
To add on to SirGoofy's horrible lines, how about the entire civil war scene? "Now communication technology races headlong into the future, and soon people all over the world are sharing life's most important moments faster than ever before." Slavery just ended and the script is talking about life's most important moments, as if it was a Kodak moment. On top of that, the man holding the paper is African American, which simply doesn't make sense in context and is borderline offensive.
At this point, communication technology DID race headlong into the future. Do you dispute that?
That leads me to another thing I can't stand about the new attraction. Instead of the inventions being the focus of each scene, it's more about the time period. As mentioned above, for some reason the Civil War is emphasized in the printing press scene. Instead of celebrating the art of cinema, we are hit over the head with the fact that it's the 1930s with the Olympics footage, the advertisement for the Mickey Mouse cartoon, and the ticket taker holding a newspaper, again referring to the Olympics. Finally, instead of concentrating on television itself, the next scene emphasizes that it is the 60's (1969 to be exact). There's a Beatles reference, Mouse Trap, the moon landing etc.
I disagree. If anything, the new script is more focused on the specific inventions than ever before -- even pulling in mainframe and personal computers, The Library of Alexandria, and Mathematics. The previous version didn't mention the importance of any of those things, and only spoke in bromides about computers -- suddenly we are in a scene with a boy and girl on a webcam with absolutely no explanation. Really? That's dog-gone awful, and the previous script really should have made a much better attempt at making the connections.
Not to be a downer, but when someone actually defends the new version, I've got to play devil's advocate. SSE used to be my favorite attraction, but I find the new version to be a complete disaster of epic proportions. Don't even get me started on the descent.
The descent that allows you to communicate with a ride about communications, and allows us to understand that communication isn't a one-way street, and isn't simply a professor lecturing in your ear? That all change and invention begins with YOU? Sure, it would be nice to have some pretty things to look at all around in the descent tunnel, but you can't simply discount this very clear statement about who influences the future.
I studied and majored in this, so I think I have some authoritative ground to stand on when I say that the new script is factually much stronger and more accurate than ever. Some of the wording could have been a bit better, but overall, the script is a significant improvement over the old one, and I'm glad that my subject of study isn't presented as such a dry topic any longer, and allows people to interact with the ride instead of being a staid, out-dated, creaky ride through history. SSE2007 makes the topic relevant again, especially in a time when the old Dinosaur media is being ousted in favor of the plethora of viewpoints that actually exist. It's our job to filter out the babble, and it's our job to shape the future.