Crazy Harry said:
The thing that bothers me first and formost about Monsters and MM is the apparent lack of AAs and dependancey on video technology. What happened to the days of life like robotics and immersive environments. I don't get the same feeling on rides like mission space and soarin as I do pirates or mansion, but it seems as though disney is abbandoning their profitable roots for fast cash money in the bank attractions although, atleast for me, rides like splash mountain and great movie ride are what keep me coming back, not video screen BS. I'm starting to lose faith. Of course, money out the butt out weighs traditional ideals, artistry, and imagination.
Thanks for bringing the thread back to the subject. :sohappy:
I agree that there is something about physical 3D environments like AAs that is very compelling, and I wouldn't want to see WDI abandon those kinds of attractions in favor of all screen-based attractions.
On the other hand, there's something to be said for screen-based technologies as well. I think Soarin' is one of the coolest rides at WDW, and a lot of people agree. And Disney clearly expected SGE (with an advanced AA) to be a much bigger headliner than Turtle Talk (intended to be a minor attraction in The Living Seas), but WDW visitors have voted loudly in favor of TT by their attendance.
Thankfully, WDI hasn't abandoned building AA-based attractions. Both SGE and Expedition Everest showcase new developments in AA engineering, though one is clearly more popular than the other. DL just got an AA-type Monsters Inc. dark ride, and I'm sure we've got more coming down the pike. Meanwhile, our existing dark rides like PotC and HM are getting the TLC they deserve.
It may be true that a screen-based attraction like TLF is cheaper to build than an AA-based one. If so, that's not a bad thing. Don't think of less-expensive attractions like playgrounds and movies as
replacements for expensive attractions. Instead, think of them as
additional minor attractions in places or at times where there wasn't enough space or money to build a major attraction. There's still a lot of space and a lot of money for future enhancements, so think of these minor additions as fun little extras while they're planning the next big thing.
Besides, screens can be cool. With the amount of money people spend on video games, TV, and movies in this country, clearly we haven't lost our fascination with screens. Make them interactive, 3D, or otherwise innovative, and you've got something nifty to put in the parks.
-p.b.
