Additional Info on "The Laugh Floor" storyline

Timmay said:
Wanna' bet you are in the minority??

Prolly so, but doesn't change the way I feel. Luckily for me, Disney makes lots of different attractions, so I can have mine and you can have yours and we can come on here and argue or which is better/lamer/overrated. Of course you will always be right and have the majority on your side, cuz I'm a little bit weird.

I understand you wish there was only 1 flavor of opinions (yours) and you can post up you little mascot and look down upon those who don't agree with ya. Thats okay.

Come to think of it, Chicken Little is a good spokesman. Yeah no one believed him and in the end, well we all know who was right.
 

CSUFSteve

Active Member
Maybe this has already been said, and apologies if so, but my 1st reaction to this attraction was... placeholder. Especially given all the other ideas Imagineers have had for this space, it seems unlikely this is the final idea that made it into this space. It sounds to me like something they're throwing together a) based on the success of the Meet 'N Greets and b) to have something more visible in that space. I wonder how much of it is just to give the Park more capacity and flow in the area. I realize it will be a small blip in MK's overall attendance, but just curious.

I personally think, if the attraction really is just a temporary thing, then it will do what Disney wants it to do. But it doesn't have a shelf life. Its lines will not survive longer than 2 years, IMHO. And that show building is prime real estate for Tomorrowland since it and Stitch are the 1st things everyone sees coming across the bridge.
 

Timmay

Well-Known Member
ReallyBigKid said:
Prolly so, but doesn't change the way I feel. Luckily for me, Disney makes lots of different attractions, so I can have mine and you can have yours and we can come on here and argue or which is better/lamer/overrated. Of course you will always be right and have the majority on your side, cuz I'm a little bit weird.
It is not a matter of what we think is better or worse, only what is or is not a popular attraction. I don't think there are more than a handful of people that would rather have an empty space than nothing at all.

ReallyBigKid said:
I understand you wish there was only 1 flavor of opinions (yours) and you can post up you little mascot and look down upon those who don't agree with ya. Thats okay.
Wow, must have gotten your crystal ball back from the shop to know so much about my feelings...I need to get me one of those.:rolleyes:

ReallyBigKid said:
Come to think of it, Chicken Little is a good spokesman. Yeah no one believed him and in the end, well we all know who was right.
Yep, the acorn!!
 

bferrara16

Active Member
CSUFSteve said:
Maybe this has already been said, and apologies if so, but my 1st reaction to this attraction was... placeholder.

It's funny that you say that, because I was thinking that Turtle Talk was somewhat of a placeholder/testing ground for the technology and now, since it proved successful & popular, we are going to get a full-scale use with the Laugh Floor. I have nothing to back that up - just the feeling I got (especially looking at the progression of the queue).

I also have a side question - is there a site somewhere that someone can point me to that lists every ride/attraction that has been opened in WDW in order by date? (I'm just curious to see this as a result of the arguments that every ride is based on a character nowadays, or every ride has to do with pixar, etc. - I'm wondering what the actual breakdown is/would be based on the recent rumors). Thanks.
 

PurpleDragon

Well-Known Member
Well if you guys think about it, a large percentage of attractions in WDW are based on animated characters. BUT............how many hugely successful Disney animated films have you seen in recent years?

All the successful animated films in the past 4-5 years have been Pixar films. So why ignore the success of these films simply cause they were not Disney originals?
 

Pongo

New Member
PurpleDragon said:
All the successful animated films in the past 4-5 years have been Pixar films. So why ignore the success of these films simply cause they were not Disney originals?

And now that Disney has bought Pixar, they ARE Disney originals.

There really is no reason not to use them.
 

wannab@dis

Well-Known Member
Pongo said:
And now that Disney has bought Pixar, they ARE Disney originals.

There really is no reason not to use them.
Exactly! I really just don't get the animosity for the extremely popular and successful Pixar features. They now have complete control of the licensing.

How many people griped about the Muppets? They had to go out and license that franchise prior to the purchase. Some of the same ones complaining about Pixar have complained about not enough Muppets. :brick:
 

nibblesandbits

Well-Known Member
Pongo said:
And now that Disney has bought Pixar, they ARE Disney originals.

There really is no reason not to use them.
Exactly. I have been trying to say that. I don't know how hard it is for people to realize that. Pixar is Disney now.
 

PurpleDragon

Well-Known Member
Pongo said:
And now that Disney has bought Pixar, they ARE Disney originals.

There really is no reason not to use them.


Exactly, but yet people keep complaining about the fact that Disney is basing too many new attractions around Pixar movies.

Well now these ARE Disney movies, so these new attractions are no different than anything you would find in Fantasyland in MK for the most part. And IMO alot of these new attractions are 100 times better than the outdated rides like Peter Pan, but people will continue to argue this fact since they are so partial to dark rides.


Oh and Wannab@Dis, great sig :animwink: :lol: :drevil:
 

CaptainMichael

Well-Known Member
dxwwf3 said:
The Pixar films have ALWAYS been Disney films to me.
Me too.

I was thinking the other day that the Pixar team should make a full-length animated feature with Mickey and the gang. If anyone can do it, it's them.
 

wannab@dis

Well-Known Member
STR8FAN2005 said:
Me too.

I was thinking the other day that the Pixar team should make a full-length animated feature with Mickey and the gang. If anyone can do it, it's them.
Oh my... can you imagine the uproar!?! :eek:

It would be awesome! :D
 

CSUFSteve

Active Member
Yeah, but I think we're diverging from the real issue of what people are saying here. I think beneath all the rhetoric are two main points. It's not so much that people have a problem with Pixar per-say, but rather:

1) Tomorrowland/Discoveryland has lost its identity. It's the lack of a thematic direction I think that has people concerned. I don't think it matters whether what's there are Pixar or Disney content, but just that the thematic choices are no longer consistent with the original vision of Tommorowland. Paris, of course, had the take of the "tomorrow that never was" from a science-fact point of view. MK had the same take but from a science-fiction point of view. But both were still true to the concept of Tomorrowland. I think most people railing on Pixar-ification of Tomorrowland are more complaining about the fundamental shift in approach and lack of thematic consistency throughout the land. Potentially more troubling to some is that it has the *potential* (although I in no way believe we're at this point) to signal that Disney is just interested in filling the lands with whatever will work and even out crowd flow, theming to be used as a guideline only. Again, I don't think it matters here that it just happens to be Pixar vs Disney content.

2) I think part of this also boils down to a little animosity that corporate Disney has (temporarily) written off 2D. That we all know that 2D is still a perfectly viable medium but Disney has just suffocated WDFA's ability to tell a compelling story. Does anyone really believe that if Lion King were released in theatres today that it would flop b/c it's not 3D? I hardly think so. We can say 2D is dead all we want, but we killed 2D ourselves, we have no one else to blame. So I think some of the Pixar backlash is stemming from this rather emotional and subjective frame of reference.

I think this will subside as the integration becomes cleaner. We should all be happy that Lassiter has publicly stated his excitement about reinvigorating traditional hand-drawn animation. And I'm also excited that he's interested in producing more shorts. Like Walt Disney, he understands that shorts are excellent proving ground to develop talent. It doesn't have to be profitable in and of itself, but what it does for the art form is immeasureable.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom