rael ramone
Well-Known Member
https://www.popsugar.com/smart-living/Disney-Changing-Walt-Disney-World-Tower-Terror-43593031
Not a 'yes we are', but very disturbing nonetheless....
Not a 'yes we are', but very disturbing nonetheless....
The 30,000 hotel rooms and guests. The real question is why will it still out draw both Universal parks in 2017? Disney's dimestic parks attendance per quaterly conference call were up 4% in the first quarter (2nd qtr for Disney physical year) Given the success of Pandora, the summer will also be up several percent this year. Shanghi will be up too but in reality the 6 million increase they should get will mostly be due to full year of operations. Don't be shocked if the increase listed on next years report has a total increase for Disney attendance being over 10 million.How the heck is DHS still out performing DCA? Yeesh.
Agree 100% Any drop in attendance is akin to looking at the difference when you take your finger out of a full bucket of water!The WDW parks are often so unbelievably busy compared to years ago, surprised by any decrease TBH
How the heck is DHS still out performing DCA? Yeesh.
*whispers* it's not
I have no doubts but what are the numbers?
These are the numbers we have. This argument comes up every year. lol.
Imagine if this was your job and your employer....
And the numbers are as fabricated as they have ever been! Those numbers will never be close to accurate, no matter what park.These are the numbers we have. This argument comes up every year. lol.
What does AECOM gain by fabricating numbers?And the numbers are as fabricated as they have ever been! Those numbers will never be close to accurate, no matter what park.
And the numbers are as fabricated as they have ever been! Those numbers will never be close to accurate, no matter what park.
Nothing but the method they use for collection has to involve some numbers provided by disney, which do have a reason to fabricate numbers.What does AECOM gain by fabricating numbers?
Misleading≠FabricatedWhat does AECOM gain by fabricating numbers?
Yes, these are how the numbers can differ but nobody ever seems to claim a familiarity with AECOM's methodology. There are also repeated accusations of fabrication without a solid motivation given.Misleading≠Fabricated
Since this is our annual conversation, here's how these figures can be misleading.
- "First Click"- park attendance is based on the first park a guests visits in a day. If you visit DHS, finish up before lunch and leave for Epcot, DHS gets your click added to their tally. TDO and Burbank's concerns about DHS stem primarily from guest spending and time spent in the park. That's why capacity hasn't been the concern it should be with the expansion, which is more of a replacement project.
- "Hard Ticket" Events- Admissions for Mickey's Halloween and Christmas parties at the MK are counted as first clicks. Doesn't matter if you've been at the MK all day, a MNSHP or MVMCP is a new admission. Taking this into consideration, the Magic Kingdom is not the world's most popular theme park of 2016, Disneyland is because holiday events are included with admission, as do all the other castle parks.
No one should have to look at Meg Crofton when they're eating food.
I approve heartily of this photo shop on all three counts
I have no doubts but what are the numbers?
Disney's actual attendance details are never going to be public. But ask yourself this...do you really think, in its truncated state, DHS had an average of 30K guests per day in 2016? Because that's what this report is claiming.
Yes, these are how the numbers can differ but nobody ever seems to claim a familiarity with AECOM's methodology. There are also repeated accusations of fabrication without a solid motivation given.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.