A Spirited Valentine ...

xdan0920

Think for yourselfer
They aren't watching sports. Have you seen the ratings? Have you seen how attendance has gone down and NFL playoff games were going to be blacked out unless tickets were bought up by local TV stations? My point is you need to deliver media in a way they want it. If they do watch sports they don't want to be forced to watch it on cable and have a package. They just want to be able to stream it on their ipad or Samsung TV.
Well, you still have not backed up your original statement, but I assume you won't be. Kids want real things, not sports. What the f does that even mean. Anyway....

I'll pick up here. So some NFL markets had trouble selling tickets? That's been happening for decades. Meanwhile ratings for sports like, let's say, Soccer, have grown exponentially. Also, attendance for MLS is crazy high. So, how does that jive with the idea that the youts don't like sports?

If your argument is that the delivery system for live sports has to change, then I guess you're right. But you are also overlooking the fact that it's already changing. So, I guess ESPN and their peers are ahead of you. Which is surprising, since you are a random anonymous internet guy, and they are running multinational sports empires.
 

mickeyfan5534

Well-Known Member
You guys know there are more sports balls out there besides the football right?
Out of the big four in the US
Football, HATE! Basketball, meh. Baseball, I'll watch an inning or two if there's nothing else on.
Hockey's really the only sport I enjoy watching. Games are relatively short, it's actually fun to watch, traditions and rules somewhat make sense, and it's not really taken as seriously by it's fans as the other three are. Also, I've never seen a hockey player be a competitor for worst person on the planet unlike the other three.
 

jakeman

Well-Known Member
Yes, I think most of us have heard the old George Carlin routine.
I'm confused.

Is this the only way you know that there is another sport beside football and you think that's how the rest of us found out about baseball? Or was there another point you're trying to make?
 

csmat99

Well-Known Member
Well, you still have not backed up your original statement, but I assume you won't be. Kids want real things, not sports. What the f does that even mean. Anyway....

I'll pick up here. So some NFL markets had trouble selling tickets? That's been happening for decades. Meanwhile ratings for sports like, let's say, Soccer, have grown exponentially. Also, attendance for MLS is crazy high. So, how does that jive with the idea that the youts don't like sports?

If your argument is that the delivery system for live sports has to change, then I guess you're right. But you are also overlooking the fact that it's already changing. So, I guess ESPN and their peers are ahead of you. Which is surprising, since you are a random anonymous internet guy, and they are running multinational sports empires.
How is ESPN changing? They don't stream their events to everyone. You must have their channel on a cable package and on top of that their are still restrictions on what events are streamed. There are ton of articles out there about people that don't even want to buy ESPN directly especially at price point they would need to be at. They don't have programming that is worth 15-20 bucks a month. Netflix has millions of hours of shows and movies that people want. NBA games I can just buy their package directly from them and do. MLB same thing. Monday night football on ESPN must be shown by over the air channel in it's local market for the teams playing so i'm good there. I don't need ESPN. I don't like any of their talking heads. I don't care.

I have answered your question. Traveling is a real thing that young people are doing more and more of. Yes soccer has grown but it had to because US was the only place in the world that it's not the most popular sport. But even if MLS continues to grow they won't be delivering it by ESPN. The model will most likely be directly to consumers or via streaming via Amazon, twitter or verizon.
 

seascape

Well-Known Member
How is ESPN changing? They don't stream their events to everyone. You must have their channel on a cable package and on top of that their are still restrictions on what events are streamed. There are ton of articles out there about people that don't even want to buy ESPN directly especially at price point they would need to be at. They don't have programming that is worth 15-20 bucks a month. Netflix has millions of hours of shows and movies that people want. NBA games I can just buy their package directly from them and do. MLB same thing. Monday night football on ESPN must be shown by over the air channel in it's local market for the teams playing so i'm good there. I don't need ESPN. I don't like any of their talking heads. I don't care.

I have answered your question. Traveling is a real thing that young people are doing more and more of. Yes soccer has grown but it had to because US was the only place in the world that it's not the most popular sport. But even if MLS continues to grow they won't be delivering it by ESPN. The model will most likely be directly to consumers or via streaming via Amazon, twitter or verizon.
I actually do stream ESPN to my Sprint Cell phone. I subscribe to FIOS and get many channels via streaming.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
Scale shouldn't be mistaken for Size or Height. Scale is the relationship between the sizes of different architectural elements. I.e., if you took the exact same castle (SB) and enlarged it by 150%, then, yes, you'd have scale issues and the larger size wouldn't be an improvement. But if you subbed in the taller, slenderer Paris Castle, "scale" would be unchanged and you'd have a more soaring, elegant, impressive centerpiece.

The castle in the art looks to be significantly taller than Paris', but scale isn't an issue unless elements like the turrets, windows or portculis were enlarged without thought to how they fit the building or land standards (e.g. 2x bigger). Size-wise, I don't think it will overwhelm the park or surrounding areas in a negative way. In front of those hills, the current SB looks like a quaint little manor house , versus an eye-popping fairytale castle.
By scale, I am referring to how other elements of the park are designed around the park in relation to the castle. Consider the heights of Splash and Big Thunder mountain to Cinderella Castle at MK and TDL. Though neither attraction is in FL, they are designed to be weinnies for their lands, but are deferential to the castle. HKDL is modeled after Disneyland's intimate scale. Attractions like SM and BGMRR were designed to conform to this scale.

Then there's the issue of context. DLP's castle is not a solitary item, but informed by its surroundings. From the Main Street approach to the size of the hub, the castle exists in harmony with them to make the impact it has. Now with HK's new castle, nothing is being changed, aside from a new castle stage, to accommodate this new castle. The Main St modeled on Anaheim's, the hub, and the castle courtyard will be changed. Applying the shape of the Paris castle, two arching lines converging at the top of the tallest spire, will overwhelm the space because the space isn't meant to hold such a dramatic sharply pointed form.

Additionally, if the hills are a problem for the castle, then why would you build Arrendale with its fake ones? It is that much closer to the mountains.
 
Last edited:

HMF

Well-Known Member
I'm confused.

Is this the only way you know that there is another sport beside football and you think that's how the rest of us found out about baseball? Or was there another point you're trying to make?
I knew about Baseball before I knew about football. The fundamental problem I have with all sports and modern life in general is the dog-eat-dog nature and the divisiveness it causes. Never mind the fact that the players are grossly over-compensated while people who do the real work that keeps society flourishing (Scientists, Teachers etc.) struggle to make ends meet, On top of that the players are treated like easily disposable pawns and are replaced easily, Plus the owners are either individual billionaires or a faceless group of businessmen who don't disclose their identities and people plan their lives and worldview around whether a sports team is winning or not and it is treated as actual news because as we all know whether my team is winning or losing is much more important than tens of millions of people losing health care. Sports is literally a reflection of everything I don't like about society.
 

csmat99

Well-Known Member
So, kids.....travel....instead of watching sports? That's your contention?
not sure why you are using terms kids. They are young adults. And travel is just one part. Sports can be in their lives I didn't say it couldn't be but the way they consume it and want to consume it is not how ESPN delivers it.

Let me ask you a question. Are you part of the generation that just thinks a company like Kodak would never get wiped out and cease to exist? Or better yet do you think a company like Mcd's will always be around? In this day and age things change so quickly if you don't have you hand on the pulse of your consumer you will but gone before you know it. Especially if you're a public company at the mercy of the stockholders.
 

Prock3

Member
Is someone really saying that Americans want to watch soccer? Absolutely not true.

Kids very much still want to play sports, and watch them too. The reason attendance is going down across ALL major sports is because it has become stupid expensive to go to a game. Not for lack of interest and not because people would "prefer to travel".

Sports are a way of American life, more than any other nation. Not to mention that sports and athletics are incredible developmental tools for children.
 

jakeman

Well-Known Member
I knew about Baseball before I knew about football. The fundamental problem I have with all sports and modern life in general is the dog-eat-dog nature and the divisiveness it causes. Never mind the fact that the players are grossly over-compensated while people who do the real work that keeps society flourishing (Scientists, Teachers etc.) struggle to make ends meet, On top of that the players are treated like easily disposable pawns and are replaced easily, Plus the owners are either individual billionaires or a faceless group of businessmen who don't disclose their identities and people plan their lives and worldview around whether a sports team is winning or not and it is treated as actual news because as we all know whether my team one is much more important than tens of millions of people losing health care. Sports is literally a reflection of everything I don't like about society.
Reading that was drinking from an absolute fire hose of hyperbole.

Some of your core points have validity but they are presented in a cloud of such over the top rhetoric that it would be difficult to deconstruct and synthesize into a coherent counterpoint.
 

csmat99

Well-Known Member
Is someone really saying that Americans want to watch soccer? Absolutely not true.

Kids very much still want to play sports, and watch them too. The reason attendance is going down across ALL major sports is because it has become stupid expensive to go to a game. Not for lack of interest and not because people would "prefer to travel".

Sports are a way of American life, more than any other nation. Not to mention that sports and athletics are incredible developmental tools for children.
The point isn't about if people like sports. It's about how they value their time and money with regards to sports. Like you said going to a game is very expensive and time it takes to go to a game takes a big chunk of the limited time you have. The issue with regards to ESPN is no one really wants to be forced to pay for something they don't even watch. There is so much content out there for consumers to consume but ESPN is sitting on a house of cards. The only thing keeping them afloat are these huge contracts for NFL, NBA and college football. But that gravy train is done. Why do you think NFL signed streaming deal with Amazon for thursday games?

Another small nugget. Goodell was livid ESPN cut people like Ed Warner and others like him covering NFL(right before draft). NFL wants to protect their brand and have their product delivered by top notch talent. Not some young pretty face or by someone just looking at making a hot take.
 

truecoat

Well-Known Member
In the ala carte programming model in a study by TIVO

Disney does very well in the ala carte channel model with ABC as the number one pick overall, However this is marred as usual by ESPN being number 19 followed by FS1 at 36,

Note in this survey ESPN DOES beat The Weather Channel which is number 20

The overall message seems to be that sports are simply not as valuable a property as they once were probably because Americans are so busy working they don't have time to watch whole games anymore and we may be returning to the time when radio play by play and box scores were the method most got their sports fix from.

http://www.fiercecable.com/broadcas...desirable-a-la-carte-channels-tivo-study-says

Not surprising since I can get all I need from sports on my phone without having to watch a couple idiots yuck it up.
 

seascape

Well-Known Member
Correct you have to have a package like Comcast, directv and FIOS. You don't stream directly from ESPN.
The best part is I only need one package which I can then use at my other homes. I no longer have to pay Comcast or Altice for my other homes. That saves lots of money and I no longer have to support comcast and their terrible service.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom