ford91exploder
Resident Curmudgeon
Just because a resort is going through construction, does not equate to lesser service.
In the real world no it does not, At Disney however...
Just because a resort is going through construction, does not equate to lesser service.
Congratulations, you just passed your final exam to qualify as a Disney Resort hotel manager.
Distinguished hotels don't react to customer complaints; they act to prevent them in the first place.
Walt Disney World hotels used to be like this. Now staff (oops, I mean Cast Members) are trained to treat customers (oops, I mean Guests) like the opposing team. It's all about squeezing those pennies to improve margins.
It just goes to show you how stupid they are. One of the reasons why comic book movies are as successful as they are now is because women are going to them. Go to any comic con and it is mind blowing how many women are there compared to 5-10 years ago. Women are the largest growing segment of this market. Disney is ignoring this demographic at there own peril. I see so many young women walking around with Wonder Woman and Harley Quinn apparel. They should have had a whole line of Black Widow and Scarlett Witch apparel at Hot Topic or another retailer. But that wouldn't fit in there BRANDS plan.
I’m prohibited from sharing the slides, but the takeaway is that, unlike the actual demos, the desired demographics had no females in it whatsoever.
ohh, they will add plenty!!!.. wait for it.. wait for it...... themed bathrooms...Hopefully the announced 60 year exhibit at the D23 Expo isn't the only presentation for the parks this year at the expo especially for Disneyland. We have waited long enough, something new needs to be announced for Disneyland and/or Walt Disney World.
https://d23.com/the-walt-disney-archives-to-present-disneyland-the-exhibit-at-d23-expo-2015/
The already gave us her origin story in MARVEL'S Agent Carter. The story has been done before and the truth is that Black Widow's lore is not very compelling to begin with. A movie about her would end up being a another Jason Borne movie.
MARVEL did a great job introducing her in Iron Man 2 and pulling her along into the avengers but I just don't see audiences lining up to see MARVEL'S super spy kill an unknown politician in an unheard of country just because he is a bad guy.
Captan Marvel is the answer to all of this; the bombastic female audience just has to wait for now.
I have noticed that the group that is bemoaning a lack of female super-hero movies is (not surprising) quiet on the topic of Disney Prince movies.
How about we let market forces drive what Disney produces and not attempt to socio-engineer an end result.
No disagreement here but that IS in fact her story. And we can all see why that wouldn't make a good movie.
EDIT: and on the topic of the Iron Man toy being sold with the motorcycle, I would argue that, in the lore, tony Stark probably built that bike, so it is 'his' motorcycle. I just wanted to toss this out there.
As an element within the busines that reacts to consumer demand.A clever thought but that is exactly what marketing does; attempt to engineer market forces.
You mean like the other 4 Jason Borne movies?The already gave us her origin story in MARVEL'S Agent Carter. The story has been done before and the truth is that Black Widow's lore is not very compelling to begin with. A movie about her would end up being a another Jason Borne movie.
There are more female characters than just Captain Marvel.MARVEL did a great job introducing her in Iron Man 2 and pulling her along into the avengers but I just don't see audiences lining up to see MARVEL'S super spy kill an unknown politician in an unheard of country just because he is a bad guy.
Captan Marvel is the answer to all of this; the bombastic female audience just has to wait for now.
I have noticed that the group that is bemoaning a lack of female super-hero movies is (not surprising) quiet on the topic of Disney Prince movies.
I think the easiest solution to pull all sides together would be to campaign for Disney to lighten up on (or stop altogether) the princess movie franchises.
My last thought for now about the sexism debate.
I think the easiest solution to pull all sides together would be to campaign for Disney to lighten up on (or stop altogether) the princess movie franchises. That is what is causing all the stress on the boy vs girl debate. As mentioned elsewhere here, Disney is too lopsided on the little girl demographic and needs to bring in little boys. That is what the pirates franchise and Jake the Neverland Pirate were suppose to do, but Disney has done a really c-rappy job of bring those franchises into the theme park experience (certainly not to the extent of the princesses). If they stopped with the friggin princess movies and let go of some of the branding around them then we could have a world with female MARVEL fans and female Star Wars fans.
As it is now, as long as they continue to push out new princess movie after new princess movie with balancing out the male element, everyone will continue to feel like there are significant demographic segments being ignored.
But we all know that Disney will never let go of that nut. And as a result Disney will continue to suffer at the lack of interest from boys and therefore as a result girls will continue to suffer with feeling ignored in the new MARVEL and Star Wars marketing.
The Captan Marvel movie is still a long way away.
Agree with this.It just goes to show you how stupid they are. One of the reasons why comic book movies are as successful as they are now is because women are going to them. Go to any comic con and it is mind blowing how many women are there compared to 5-10 years ago. Women are the largest growing segment of this market. Disney is ignoring this demographic at there own peril. I see so many young women walking around with Wonder Woman and Harley Quinn apparel. They should have had a whole line of Black Widow and Scarlett Witch apparel at Hot Topic or another retailer. But that wouldn't fit in there BRANDS plan.
the Irony is.. the male "comic" community was in uproar for the change lol.They also are rolling out a female thor comic book to target the woman audience... So the fact they are not working on the problem is just not true.
http://marvel.com/news/comics/22875/marvel_proudly_presents_thor
Disney did make the Thunder Mountain comic focused on a female... not that I disagree with you, just saying...
why would they do a Frozen Alaska?In my humble opinion, that would dilute the brand. Memphis needs Disney a whole lot more than Disney needs Memphis or any other Mississippi River port, I would think.
Now a Frozen Alaska cruise on the other hand . . . shoot me now. :lol
Dave, I feel like you are behind..
Did you stay at the poly during construction? Poly was proactive recovery (many things were done without the guests asking for it), Monorails were reactive (done if it caused a problem for the guest). I happen to know that rooms were reclassified as Standard when previously they would have received a premium for location/view. Effectively reducing the rate during construction. Also, Poly was given many promotional discounts as well as Water Park tickets because the themed pool was down. The quiet pool was still available and access to neighboring themed pools was available. Not as convenient, sure, but guests were informed online prior to making reservations, through multiple emails after reservations were made, and guests that had reservations before the refurb was announced were contacted and given recovery.
Regarding the monorail, downtimes were advertised as soon as the teams knew when it was happening. Downtimes are restricted to mid-week, during the middle of the day when the lowest volume of guests use it. Both monorails are not down at the same time, so if the express isn't working, then the resort one is. Downtimes are suspended during peak weeks like spring break, Easter, and summer. If it was shut down completely for as long as it would take to update, people would complain that it isn't available at all. Every major technology asset has to be taken out of service for a time, and Disney tries to be the least impactful as possible and help guests who are impacted.
I don't get that at all. What guy would be threatened by having a common interest with girls?Agree with this.
Reminds me of the gamer debate.. gaming is definitively focused to males. Say what you want, but most games are build by dudes FOR dudes.
yet, in the few years.. people have been tossing the interesting statistics.. where 51%-55% of the gamers.. were FEMALES... they are just not as visible. because they get harassed.
The Gamergate was a fine example of some really facepalm worthy males trying to protect their "manly man exclusive club" (they really feel threatened by girls? wow)
the Irony is.. the male "comic" community was in uproar for the change lol.
to chime in...
DC started to do an Harley Quin comic (with her "adventures" along with Poison Ivy)
Where she is the equivalent of a female deadpool with good and funny stories.
But release comics still do not have the same scope as a real full movie.
I don't get that at all. What guy would be threatened by having a common interest with girls?
This will be fun!
I just want to make sure I understand the price you are using: $2761 / 7 nights. Excluding tax, that's about $351/night. With tax, that's $394/night. I hope I got that right.
No, your fictitious family does not have "the ability to leave whenever they wish". They are at the mercy of Disney's mass transit.
We know what Disney transportation can be like. Certainly we've all waited 30 minutes or longer for Disney's transportation, even longer at the start of the day and end of the night. That's not exactly whenever I wish.
And it's just a joy being crammed onto a bus, standing the entire ride after standing in line waiting for that bus.
Since you referenced the AAA diamond rating, I used the AAA rate which was $167/night. Expedia offers the hotel for $179/night.
Let's not use your numbers. Bundling what you suggest through Expedia comes up with a price of $1,814.37. Tacking on the parking brings this to $1,933, significantly different than the $2,553.75 you quote.
Of course, by staying onsite, I'm now at the mercy of Disney pricing! Any offsite vs. onsite comparison is incomplete without comparing dining and merchandise. You conveniently add ancillary offsite costs without adding ancillary onsite costs.
And don't get me started on how truly mediocre most onsite dining options have become. I miss the pre Disney Dining Plan days.
If you want to compare timeshares, you'll find DVC is by far the most expensive. You can get a 1-bedroom savannah room at AKV for $1400/week. I can get a 3-bedroom presidential suite at Wyndham Bonnet Creek (located next to Caribbean Beach Resort) for about the same price. And it's closer to Epcot and DHS than AKV!
Interesting you mention that since I'm renting out my points and using the proceeds to visit Universal later this month.
I was having fun until I read this.
Really, "no desire to even visit Universal"? No desire to visit theme parks that are building the most exciting attractions in Orlando? You mean you'd rather (for example) ride Peter Pan's Flight for the 101st time? You'd rather see decade old shows? You'd rather deal with the hassle of Disney's buses, spending hours each day in line, rather than stay at a resort with easy theme park access and unlimited front-on-the-line access?
Really?
I cannot fathom "no desire" to visit Universal.
Unless it's a really bad case of Pixie Dust.
My Bothan spies tell me that the only people who got recovery during construction were ones who complained. They also tell me that people staying in the Bungalows are complaining about the Ferry Boat horn.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.