He uses his big acquisitions, Pixar, Marvel and Lucasfilm, and stock buybacks to divert the street's attention away from what's really been going on at TWDC. He's no more than a kid with some cheap card tricks.
It's an expensive deck of cards.
sure, you could read the article, but my song was way cooler.
I barely even register the Pixar buyout as an Iger thing. It's the sort of no-brainer that was gonna happen no matter who took Eisner's place. And it happened so fast after Eisner got kicked to the curb.
I'm very sure that Eisner was going to buy Pixar had the whole "Save Disney" mess not complicated the situation. And Eisner would have acquired Pixar for far less money than Iger ended up paying.
Andrew Garfield is out. They'll recast and probably take the new Spidey movies a different direction.
Nope. Eisner actually thought Pixar had outlived it's usefulness and that a flop was inevitable because there was no way a streak like that could go on forever. Better to create Circle 7 and do crappy in-house sequels then keep Pixar around.
He wasn't bad either. Too bad.
Didnt the lion king had the same issue? they didn't think it would be a good movie.. and did very good... becoming a timeless classic.
question is.. white spiddy? (peter parker), black spiddy (Morales), Black Venom Spiddy ( Flash ) or Redspiddy ( Parker clone as Scarlet Spider) ?
Going by movie studio logic, it's gonna be another Pete. Miles will probably come along in a sequel. Wouldn't be surprised if the reboot in the aftermath of Secret Wars is gonna have them co-exist.
I don't want a Spider-Man movie without Peter Parker. However I really don't want another origin story. It'll be interesting to see how they tackle this, but I'm excited either way.
