Mike S
Well-Known Member
Lol if Disney did everything we all thought it should it would be bankrupt.
Lol if Disney did everything we all thought it should it would be bankrupt.
fantastic video, what a great little ride they had, themed tunnels, the tron effects tunnel, trees, views, mary blair's mural....are the tracks and tunnels still in place?
I guess were fortunate we still have a peoplemover, even though its condition is.......anyway, I do worry it wont be around for too many more years, why I dont know, something else for them to cut and save money on. I still say heads should roll for whoever decided on and approved the current 0% creative bore of a narration.
"The justification for profit is profit." FRoA #202
"Learn the customer's weaknesses, so that you can better take advantage of him." FRoA #87
So everyone had signed off on the plans before the meeting?
I thought after WDI handed over their designs to Iger, he reviews them and then goes to the BoD for final approval? Are creatives allowed at these BoD meetings?
Is WDW management even in the conversation at any point in the process?
I'm no pixieduster when I write that Disney needs to construct a 5th Gate in Orlando by 2025. WDW really needs one.
Throughout the decades, WDW's attendance has varied quite a bit. However, the general trend has always been upward. Even during Iger's 9-plus years as CEO, WDW's attendance has grown by over 2% annually despite no major expansion to attract more Guests.
If we assume a 4% growth for the rest of this fiscal year (WDW should beat that) and 1% growth after that, this is what WDW's per theme park attendance (i.e. WDW total attendance divided by the number of theme parks) looks like by 2025:
View attachment 99248
In just a few years, per park attendance surpasses even when WDW consisted of only the Magic Kingdom, the World's most popular theme park. WDW's theme parks simply cannot handle that kind of load in 2025.
Now let's assume the same attendance growth through 2024. Then, in 2025, let's assume a 5th theme park opens resulting in a relatively modest (for a new theme park) 10% bump in attendance:
View attachment 99324
Even with 5 theme parks, per theme park attendance in 2025 matches last year's number. 2014 was a record year for WDW and, by the way, one in which crowd levels were a significant source of complaints from Guests.
Note that these projections don't factor in the large investment Disney is about to make in DHS, which almost certainly will result in an additional 5-to-10% attendance bump.
With 5 theme parks in 2025, WDW will be crowded. With only 4 theme parks in 2025, WDW will be insufferable.
Remember, by 2025, it will have been over a quarter of a century since WDW's last theme park.
The numbers suggest a 5th Gate is not a pipe dream. By 2025, the numbers suggest it's a financial and operational necessity.
At least you use numbers to back it up.
Though I think we can all agree that a 5th park will happen sooner than the parks being fully themed and cohesive environments...My strong opinion is that even a decade from now, all we'll be doing is talking.
I agree...the numbers make sense, attendence has spiked at an alarming(mostly in the MK) rate since DAK but the current 4 gates could probably handle the additional 10 million clicks a new gate would allow if they were expanded and fully developed.Nope. Despite the 28 'likes' and all the numbers, I will strongly disagree with you on this -- at present.
WDW has one park, with considerable room for expansion, that is generally overcrowded. And it has three others that not only are not, but have vast areas that either haven't been developed (DAK) or have been allowed to sit empty (the others). I'd argue, and quite well, that until WDW balances its crowds and gives people compelling reasons to visit the other parks, there is nothing to suggest a fifth gate is a remotely viable or practical from a business POV.
Americans, who still make up the vast majority of WDW visitors, don't have unlimited vacation time. Additional parks will cannibalize current visitors and, yes, future ones. There isn't a financial reason for adding a new gate any more than there is a compelling creative one (considering that only DAK comes close to being a cohesive themed environment today).
After you have four healthy gates, then we can talk about whether it makes any sense for an additional gate. My strong opinion is that even a decade from now, all we'll be doing is talking. The idea that WDW needs five parks to deal with ever increasing masses of humanity is far more simplistic than your usual spot-on analysis (don't take that as an insult as it reads harsher than intended!)
WDW needs, desperately, new and compelling attractions and entertainment across the four parks it has (yes, even MK needs more ... a lot more!) It may even need a third water park, although I'm not convinced of that either. It needs infrastructure (everything from road work that is finally happening to a transport system not based upon buses).
It NEEDS those things to be healthy and thrive.
It doesn't need a fifth gate, no matter how you torture those numbers!
Seeing the capacity crowds that have descended upon UNI-Hollywood, which by most accounts opened a lousy addition to its iconic tram tour, one can only wonder what Potter will bring next year.
Speaking of Anaheim, am hearing chatter that the new WoC is being received so poorly that it might not even last the entire 60th.
You are succinct and at the top of your game with this post.
I like the upcharge events inside upcharge parties.
OK, so you agree with it not being hurtful to the show. Good, so the exposure of the back of the Main Street Buildings is fine then? Gotcha!
However, the detail of the towel animals is not important! Alrighty then!
You are saying that the perception that you had as a kid is exactly the same now, as an adult, as it was when the world was new to you! And to think otherwise would be BS! Can't say I agree with that!
And they battle us with corporate buzz words like synergy.
I don't think that most people realize what the entire new Tomorrowland'67 meant at that time. The major shows were truly World's Fair quality with several being new or experimental. It's difficult to describe what it was like to experience Adventure Thru Inner Space Atomobiles for the first time or board the Goodyear Peoplemover from a rotating platform only to watch the doors close automatically. I'm sure that is was very similar to visiting EPCOT Center in it's first few years. And the Carousel of Progress pulled it all together. Not only did one get to enjoy a novel carousel theater presentation, one got to ascend to the upper level to view the concept for a new city. After experiencing all that it was no wonder why Disney had you step out onto that long balcony to see a working prototype of the transportation system featured in his city of the future.
It was also a time in which the Disney name (not BRAND), meant something entirely different. Disney gave an approachable and humanistic quality to the presentations by the various corporate sponsors. Disney wasn't just magical in and of itself -- it created magic by being visionary and cutting edge, and it was considered to be QUALITY first and foremost.
You know what @WDW1974 often says about WDW having the air of a place about to file for Chapter 11, instead of a place making millions... well doesn't the new 'lounge' at DHS just scream "going out of business!".
https://twitter.com/daveh787/status/616621872319496192
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.