A Spirited Dirty Dozen ...

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
What are the odds this version of the Lion King doesn't have the Elton John/Tim Rice music?

I would say practically nil. Without the music it's just Hamlet with animals and fart jokes.

What will be interesting is to see whether they keep the original voice cast, and whether the casting generates any accusations of whitewashing.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
I would say practically nil. Without the music it's just Hamlet with animals and fart jokes.

What will be interesting is to see whether they keep the original voice cast, and whether the casting generates any accusations of whitewashing.
There's an assumption that because Favreau directed The Jungle Book this film will be all CG, but I wonder if they would use the Broardway musical instead. The casting would be not be a non-issue because the cast is made up primarily of PoC, but wouldn't this hurt all the broadway productions around the world? I had assumed they wouldn't do a Lion King remake for this reason.
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
There's an assumption that because Favreau directed The Jungle Book this film will be all CG, but I wonder if they would use the Broardway musical instead. The casting would be not be a non-issue because the cast is made up primarily of PoC, but wouldn't this hurt all the broadway productions around the world? I had assumed they wouldn't do a Lion King remake for this reason.
It hasn't stopped them from doing Beauty and Beast.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
What will be interesting is to see whether they keep the original voice cast, and whether the casting generates any accusations of whitewashing.

I feel like they could do a beat by beat redo of the original including all the original dialogue/songs as is, but just doing CGI and a "realistic" look instead of the 2D cartoon look.

Of course, why would they go to such trouble if they don't change anything? But if they were to do it that way, it would eliminate potential backlash of "destroying" a classic by making it too different from the original.
 

Mike S

Well-Known Member
Pretty much, but, there was alot of push back when Uni took the axe to the beloved Jaws attraction. Goodbye practical effects, hello 'screens' :-(
Jaws is pretty much the only classic Universal ride that I'll actually miss but Diagon Alley more than makes up for it. Plenty of practical effects throughout the land itself and we still have a blast of fire. The problem with Gringotts is not just "screenz." There are plenty of other mostly screen based rides out there that are still much better. The problem is with pacing and how they focused so much on one specific event. The story would've faired better as a simple coaster ride through the vaults, screens or no screens.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
A billion and a half is nothing to sneeze at, though.
Disney is probably anticipating that the movie releases will, if anything, revitalize ticket sales in the stage productions.
That's a pretty risky bet for a show that still is one of the strongest shows currently on Broadway with a healthy touring business. It just seems like more harm than good.

Also, if they were going to do an adaptation of show, wouldn't Julie Taymor be the prudent choice as director?
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Disney management - "Who needs new ideas when we have all this IP just sitting around collecting dust?!??"

After Tomorrowland crashed and burned, you really think the studio is going to be taking a lot of expensive risks with live action in the near future?

Even relatively poorly-known IPs like the BFG and Pete's Dragon can't make any money these days.
 

mickeyfan5534

Well-Known Member
That's what we said about the first announcement of Beauty And The Beast and The Jungle Book.
Those are different. This is actually physically reanimating and revoicing an entire movie in CGI which I'm against because there's no difference. Beauty and the Beast and The Jungle Book have decent (if still cash grabby) reasons for Live Action remakes but there's no point in remaking The Lion King in live action because there's no human characters. It's reanimating.
 

NormC

Well-Known Member
The source says that Universal might actually be getting ready to sell the marvel rights to Disney and then in return but the DC rights from six flags when that contract is up.
Universal doesn't have anything to sell. They do not "own" the rights. They license them from Marvel/Disney and pay a bargain price for it every year.
 

Bairstow

Well-Known Member
Universal doesn't have anything to sell. They do not "own" the rights. They license them from Marvel/Disney and pay a bargain price for it every year.

True enough, but there's no reason that Universal can't offer a contract to Disney that agrees to exit the licensing agreement as part of their consideration.

Disney would have to make it worth their wile, though.
 

ford91exploder

Resident Curmudgeon
God please let this be on the table. The musical is one of the most inspirational pieces of live theatre I have ever seen.

Another well done video adaption of one of my favorite musicals. I just hate they had to shorten some of the numbers to budgets and time constraints.

Still it was an amazing production with Elane Paige doing some of her best work ever as Grizabella.

 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom