Yeah, clearly, like Roseanne, they already had the gun loaded, they just waited to have to bring it out. Disney's strategy seems to be "nip this in the bud" versus "we need to thoughtfully consider".
Now, if that's because they wanted rid of him anyway creatively, or because they knew this was a bomb out there that was waiting to blow, or even if there is more we don't know about - that is what we don't know. My bet is, they knew this bomb was going to blow at some point, and the response would have been the same if it was some wacko far-right winger who brought it up, or if it had been The Mary Sue.
Yeah, I've looked through a few of Cernovich's tweets from the 19th, and he started tagging Disney within ~1 1/2 hours-ish of his first tweet to Gunn. He also tagged the LAPD (so yeah, they tried to get him arrested, too) in one that I saw, but that is the ONLY instance I've seen the police mentioned in everything I've read so far.
They go further to accuse all media outlets in general of covering for pedophiles both in Hollywood and DC, and Twitter of shadow banning their accounts (which is funny, because I wouldn't be able to see their tweets if that were the case). Everything mentioned in this and the above paragraph were found on Twitter under Cernovich's account.
I need to find the source that mentioned creative differences - there are a lot of articles out there - some written by sites I wouldn't consider credible. One thing is crystal clear though - this whole thing went down REALLY FAST.
And holy hell, I think I *may* have found the source of the first website article about Gunn... I run a Disney FB group (it's not very big), and when I get up in the morning, one of the first things I do while I have my coffee is seach Google for anything Disney related (I keep the tab open throughout the day and check every so often for new stuff). On Friday morning (the 20th) shortly after 8am (when I got up) I scheduled a post of an article about Gunn saying his tweets revealed "racism, homophobia, and assault against children". I even joked about it saying basically "if we fire everyone because of social media, there'd be no Hollywood left" because there hadn't been anything about him being fired yet when I scheduled it, the site that had posted it was obviously a conservative site bursting with opinions and I didn't take it seriously in the least, and Roseanne was still relatively fresh in my mind that morning. The article itself was published at 1:56am on the 20th (but the url shows that the article was created on the 19th - and it screams WordPress or some other non-professional CMS to me). My group post went live at 12:28pm the same day, and shortly after it went live, we were commenting in utter shock that Gunn had been fired.
I'd like to see if I can find out which media outlet broke the news about the firing first, as well as some of the stuff I read from Cernovich and his followers (like about the email to Disney, the screenshots of the tweets, etc.)