Gate three being a half day park seems unlikely. Rather, my concern stems from Disney’s inability to properly invest in their other parks after DAK opened in 98 through to today. USF and IoA had pretty good roadmaps for major additions like Super Nintendo World to prepare those parks for gate three and avoid cannibalization. By pushing gate three forward, I’m concerned projects like SNW being pushed to gate three will mean USF and IoA won’t see the levels of investment needed to keep them from falling behind. The MK as main park came from failure to properly invest in the other gates and the loss of offerings/capacity at Epcot and MGM. UNI north parks can’t become a one day deal for guests. UNI needs to make the case that you need three days minimum at USO and evenly distributed quality product is the best approach.
It’s great UNI is spending lots of money on the parks and on their long term future with the property acquisitions, hint hint Disney. But as we know from the late 90’s when spending at P&R, as percentage of revenue, was at its highest, that doesn’t mean quality product or product best suited to the resort’s long term needs. I’m concerned CSMA will keep pouring money into the unit and the dunderheads at the top will squander the resort’s potential by doing things like rushing a third gate. The UNI model is arguably more capital intensive because it relies on the latest/most popular IPs. Balancing the needs of three parks long term will be a challenge seeing Disney’s difficulties in FL.
If UNI can keep adding substantive lands/attractions to USF/IoA and build a classic Disney quality themed third gate around WDW50, that’d be awesome and would really destroy their current business model. I’m just not that confident in the people running UNI to be able to pull off such a coup.