I guess you haven't experienced the briefing rooms in Flight of Passage, because not only does it talk about keystone species, but it references specific animals on Earth and habitat destruction.
Oh, my mistake. Yes, that completely connects the theming of the entire $1.5B dollar land, and the first E-ticket in a dozen years, to AK. LOL.
Look, I'm not knocking Avatar being there - personally, I think it was the wrong IP to build something off of, but I have no problem with it "fitting" into AK if that's what they went with. But clearly, the "theme" of AK is being stretched as time goes on and they focus less on real and/or live animals, it is more of an "exotic lands and the creatures that inhabit them" enviornment.
That's why I am in the camp of Indy could very easily fit in, with a connection no more artificial than a pre-show queue spiel, as Avatar has.
I wouldn't be surprised if he had, but had forgotten about it.
The environmental messaging of the entire "Avatar" area is of the blink-and-you'll-miss-it variety. There's a word or two in the queue rooms about contaminant cleanup and species introduction, but you're ushered past the "good" part of the queue so fast that there's little time to read it. The "keystone species" talk in the preshow you mentioned, combined with some stock footage of strip mining, takes up all of 4 seconds, and they don't even have time to explain what a "keystone species" is.
For what it's worth, I didn't think the Banshee even was the keystone species of Pandora's skies- isn't that the Leonopteryx?
Yeah, that was my point that others seemed to miss - no one walks into Pandora, does both the attractions, and walks out thinking "That was about conservation!" It's a tenuous example, and one that seems most pushed retroactively by people who want to give it a pass in spite of it being a) an Iger product, b) IP-based, and c) 3rd party IP based, no less - because, let's face it, it's really well done and it does feel like it fits. Just not for the reasons people
want to make it fit, so it back fits into a narrative that it doesn't actually support.