the.dreamfinder
Well-Known Member
It's not replacing rides. Shoehorned in to me is putting Frozen into Malestrom. Putting Nemo in the Seas. Putting Guardians into Energy.
I still feel Disney is using their IPs better than Universal. Look at Jimmy Fallon for example and Fast and Furious. I will take a Toy Story Land and Star Wars Land over that all day long.
![opinionated.gif](http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/opinionated.gif)
You’re both coming at this from the perspective of the consumer/fan. Themed entertainment is an art form and how the art is conceptualized and experienced should go hand in hand during a critical discussion. Guests experience Animal Kingdom in a completely different way than they do with IoA. Guests don’t need to have Joe Rohde lecture them for ninety minutes about the intentions and thematic underpinnings of the park before they enter. They feel it. They experience it in new ways every time they visit. They form a relationship with the park and can engage more deeply with it.
EPCOT Center’s been dead for years and yet it still resonates with the people lucky enough to have visited it in its prime. Heck, even kids who never got to ride Horizons or Journey Into Imagination V1 are very interested in them and not in some insincere “orange bird fandom” way.
Themed entertainment is art.
You can form a relationship with art.
You can’t form a relationship through an ancillary licensing agreement.
Beat Super Mario Odyssey earlier and I want to leave you guys with a story about the other big Nintendo game that came out this year; The Legend of Zelda- Breath of the Wild. A gamer, who took tons of pictures over the course of their journey, printed a physical photo album to remember their adventures in Hyrule. The bond they formed with this virtual space over the course of the game meant so much to them that they wanted to remember it in a tangible way.
Last edited: