The project was intended to increase park capacity without being too much of a draw itself. It was not about fixing a non-exist lack of things for young children.
No he is right, it was stated on here by many that was the entire goal of New fantasy land. The entire magic kingdom is nothing but experiences for families so that wasn't a issue. This project was about reclaiming land to pack more people in there.Wrong. This was their publicly stated goal from the outset.
Its little hill squished in the middle of several differently themed plots of fantasy land...The themeing is incredible, absolutely... I would say it's a small scale E-Ticket attraction.
What would make you think I was being sarcastic? Name me the attractions that has the same level of detail.
Exterior - Everest, splash, tower, maybe mermaid Not quite up to the level of splash, and mermaid queue is nice, its not that amazing from outside
Ride vehicles - Everest, ? It swings... no one knows any more about it.. It may be awful to ride in so too soon Jr.
Animatronics - ? Look at buzz and tell me its amazing when you look at wicked witch in the Great Movie Ride
Queue - mermaid, Everest, Kali? Tower? Star tours? You've seen the queue?
No he is right, it was stated on here by many that was the entire goal of New fantasy land. The entire magic kingdom is nothing but experiences for families so that wasn't a issue. This project was about reclaiming land to pack more people in there.
Ah....you're new.So Disney is out there in the public just stating goals that aren't actually their goals, and wdwmagic has the insight to determine which goals are the actual goals? Sounds legit.
Aren't you the troll who tried to hijack spirits thread? I'm glad the mods deleted your posts.So Disney is out there in the public just stating goals that aren't actually their goals, and wdwmagic has the insight to determine which goals are the actual goals? Sounds legit.
Aren't you the troll who tried to hijack spirits thread? I'm glad the mods deleted your posts.
I might disagree with the member in question...but really? Why the name calling?Aren't you the troll who tried to hijack spirits thread? I'm glad the mods deleted your posts.
The grassy hill is not as nice as it appears in the pictures.. In person this thing just feels out of place.
The line you quote there was the spin they were putting on the project when it was more meet-and-greet based. Pre-Mine Train.To the adults here, I don't have a link, but we all know that before the NFL project started, Disney was touting this idea of solving the fact that "our smallest guests wait in the longest lines for the shortest experiences." NFL would rectify that, which it has. I'm not sure where we are getting confused on the facts.
The line you quote there was the spin they were putting on the project when it was more meet-and-greet based. Pre-Mine Train.
Bottom line, New Fantasyland is and always has been about capacity.
Except for the littlest ones below the height requirement.Well, I'm not going to question your insight. I'm only going to say that if you're correct, it's odd how a goal that was just "spin" was actually achieved in the final results.
And the littlest ones waiting in the long lines at Fairytale Hall and the Belle...thing.Except for the littlest ones below the height requirement.
It was? You get a 4 minute mermaid ride with hour waits, a 2 minute coaster that the shorties can't ride that will surely get 2 hour waits, a "show"/meet and greet with pictures on sticks that routinely gets hour waits, and a 4 hour wait to meet Anna and Elsa? Sounds like more of the same to me. Although we do have the addition of a fast food joint that gets 2 hour waits, a brand new MAGICAL way to wait. In the sun with a parasol no less.Well, I'm not going to question your insight. I'm only going to say that if you're correct, it's odd how a goal that was just "spin" was actually achieved in the final results.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.