Parks and resorts.The $60B promised capex spend was specifically said to be for existing parks around the world -- that they each get something new.
And boat collection.
Parks and resorts.The $60B promised capex spend was specifically said to be for existing parks around the world -- that they each get something new.
Right. My point was that any park money is for existing parks.Parks and resorts.
And boat collection.
Awwww no 5th gate??Right. My point was that any park money is for existing parks.
I guess that raises a question I've had - why did they build DHS where they did and not in this plot? I get why DAK wasn't - the acreage can't compared I'd imagine - but DHS?That area has been somewhat available before EPCOT was built. There must be a reason why they haven't used it by now. But if they did, wouldn't that make that area one big theme park where MK would run into it, and it would run into EPCOT which already runs into DHS?
I guess that raises a question I've had - why did they build DHS where they did and not in this plot? I get why DAK wasn't - the acreage can't compared I'd imagine - but DHS?
…for the winAwwww no 5th gate??
They were attempting to augment the property to keep people there for their whole stay and develop a consistent, loyal fan baseJust spit balling... DHS was built as a half day park... Typhoon Lagoon was also built as a half day park (both parks opened in 1989 within a month of each other). Caribbean Beach had opened the year prior and they opened five addtional hotels in the immediate area in the three years after DHS opened. If I had to guess, they built DHS where it was because they knew they wouldn't have any problems filling the Magic Kingdom Area hotels and wanted to add a bunch of stuff around EPCOT to ensure the hotels in that area were just as desirable as the Magic Kingdom area hotels (and they probably don't have as much room to build as many hotels in the Magic Kingdom area).
That's two, however, three can make a big difference in being able to alter the theme so they seem like something different. Otherwise they can keep the same themes as MK and just call it an expansion of that park. That's were most of the people go anyway and that would help spread the crowd out a bit. That wouldn't be a 5th gate though that would just be a useful expansion of an already existing park.Never been a problem for Disneyland/DCA... or USO/IOA... or TDL/TDS... or DLP/DAW...
Don't have a clue but they most have known back then that it was available. I have to admit though that to me it doesn't seem like Epcot and DHS are that close together, but, they are within walking distance for a lot of people, my feet hurt to much to do unnecessary walking.I guess that raises a question I've had - why did they build DHS where they did and not in this plot? I get why DAK wasn't - the acreage can't compared I'd imagine - but DHS?
…or have them operate as well as they did in the 90sI’ll take a 5th gate whenever they figure out how to do and expand the other 4
Awwww no 5th gate??
If we go by Universal rules and count water parks as gates Disney already has a 5th and 6th gate making this fictional park the 7th gate.No. Disney is thinking outside the box. They will forgo the 5th Gate. And go straight to building the 6th.
That way they'll be able to increase revenue by offering a 6-park ticket. Furthermore, they will package the other multi-park tickets in such a way that you will need to purchase one that includes the nonexistent 5th Gate.
It's genius!
Yeah…but they can never be bothered to staff more than 5If we go by Universal rules and count water parks as gates Disney already has a 5th and 6th gate making this fictional park the 7th gate.
I count the miniature golf courses as 6 and 7.If we go by Universal rules and count water parks as gates Disney already has a 5th and 6th gate making this fictional park the 7th gate.
I would count the monorail, Skyliner, and all the busses as another gate: Disney's Transportation Adventures!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.