DAK “Zootopia” is being created for the Tree of Life theater

part of me wonders if somewhere in the universe, Joe Rohde is reading the last few pages of this thread (and if the surviving artists and Imagineers who made the parks what they are are reading the messages calling them "very elaborate bubble wand strip malls"). I would pay to hear their round table discussion(s)
I'm sure many monocles would fall into dole whips as the artists faint and gasps since i'm the first person to ever comment its always been profit driven.
images (1).jpeg
 

Gusey

Well-Known Member
This is the opening scene of Zootopia. In it, that Zootopia is set in a parallel world without humans, where animals have evolved to become sentient and created a society. We know the 3D show going to Animal Kingdom is focusing on biomes. If the shows follows the angle of teaching us about animals and different biomes through the lens of "how they used to be" (AKA real animals), it should be a fine compromise to get Zootopia into AK
 

lentesta

Premium Member
Calling @lentesta

Mission Breakout currently sits at a 4.5/5 on touring plans. Can you give us any insight on how this compares to the DCA TOT ratings?

(Yes the zootopia thread has devolved into ToT vs GotG:MB debate)

DHS ToT gets a 4.6, but I don't think it's fair to use that

DCA TOT was 4.35 all-time across all age groups when it closed in 2017.

My sense with the switch to GotG is that Disney was also trying to untangle its IP from CBS' Twilight Zone. So they got a more popular attraction with less outside IP.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
I don’t love zootopia - but there’s nothing wrong with it either. It’s better than turning red that’s for sure.

And as an IP - I think it fits the park better than Avatar.

Wrong on all three. Although the second point is more of a wash, both are atrociously bad. Avatar’s theme actually fits the park, as odd as that may be for me today.
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
Oh look. The same reason why Encanto doesn't fit in Animal Kingdom.

Zootopia at least has the "going savage" thing to allow some characters to act like animals. Sing doesn't even have that.

I liked Luca and Cars 3 too. I also liked Incredibles 2, Lightyear, and Elemental. Make of that what you will.
I think any film that involves animals CAN fit into AK if the storyline and theme of the ride fit in AK. If the Encanto ride is either about Antonio introducing us to various animals or if the Madrigals are trying to help nature or find or respect a columbian animal or something, the ride will fit. I assume we will get a book style report ride with the songs, with a slightly enhanced presence for Antonio... which while I'm sure will be a great ride, won't fit in AK.

Indy on the other hand I feel like will be a very similar concept to EE where we learn to respect a mythical creature.

IF Zootopia was focused outside the city and the different "animals" took us to where they grew up and showed us the natural environment they grew up in... it could work. If they built a Zootopia ride, I don't think it would vist the Hopps Family Farm, but this show might.

Sadly I feel like if they were going to include animals they would do it while the land was being initially built so it would factor into the overhead cost as for the emperors new grove show that would be a cool idea except that movie isn’t a musical.
The emperor's new groove soundtrack actually has 12 songs... it was just all cut when the movie was no longer a musical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor's_New_Groove_(soundtrack)
DCA TOT was 4.35 all-time across all age groups when it closed in 2017.

My sense with the switch to GotG is that Disney was also trying to untangle its IP from CBS' Twilight Zone. So they got a more popular attraction with less outside IP.
Thanks Len, so the GOTG:MB ride ranks higher than the TOT ride at DCA. I'll call that a win for Joe Rohde
 

UNCgolf

Well-Known Member
I'm sure many monocles would fall into dole whips as the artists faint and gasps since i'm the first person to ever comment its always been profit driven.
View attachment 846504

Calling it profit driven is very different than what you originally implied, though.

Of course they always existed to make money; there was never any intention to lose money running the parks.

The way the parks are run now (and have been run for the past 20 or so years) is very, very different than the way they were run for the first 40-50 years of operation, though. They still exist to make money, but the methods have changed dramatically.

They didn't exist solely to sell Disney media/merchandise (e.g., they actually ran shops that lost money for theming reasons; that would never happen now) -- it was just one element of many, and not even the main one. The parks were intended to be great experiences in and of themselves without needing guests to have any connection to Disney media.
 
Last edited:

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
I know. we were discussing the idea of a show repurposing parts of the plot of kingdom of the sun for the Nemo theater.
After reading said plot and seeing The Sweatbox which is a very interesting film I'm glad Mark Dindal came in to fix it to the best abilities and make it what it is..
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
I think any film that involves animals CAN fit into AK if the storyline and theme of the ride fit in AK. If the Encanto ride is either about Antonio introducing us to various animals or if the Madrigals are trying to help nature or find or respect a columbian animal or something, the ride will fit. I assume we will get a book style report ride with the songs, with a slightly enhanced presence for Antonio... which while I'm sure will be a great ride, won't fit in AK.

Indy on the other hand I feel like will be a very similar concept to EE where we learn to respect a mythical creature.

IF Zootopia was focused outside the city and the different "animals" took us to where they grew up and showed us the natural environment they grew up in... it could work. If they built a Zootopia ride, I don't think it would vist the Hopps Family Farm, but this show might.
Funnily enough, I agree with this on essentially everything EXCEPT Zootopia. It seems counterintuitive because, looking superficially at things, Zootopia seems to have the most to do with animals, but of the IP listed, it actually leaves the least room for real animal stories. It’s certainly accurate to say that animals are not core to IJ or Encanto, but the characters at least can and do interface with animals and/or cryptozoological creatures that behave in animalian fashion. Even if you went to the outskirts of the Zootopia world as you suggest, the characters still act like humans, just rural ones. Anything “animal” is essentially reduced to a quirk. Oh, this character is slow, that one has poor eyesight, that one sleeps underground, etc. Again, they can kind of work as commentators within our world, but unlike IJ and Encanto, which mostly share “our” world with some supernatural touches, the world of Zootopia is completely divorced from the topics and issues AK tackles.
 

Chester&Hester Enthusiast

Well-Known Member
New Groove has one original song. Nemo has zero. I think that proves that an IP doesn't need to be a musical to have a stage musical version at the parks.

Even further, Groove was originally meant to be a musical. There are actually a few original songs on the OST that are leftover from when the film was retooled into a buddy comedy during development.
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
IF Zootopia was focused outside the city and the different "animals" took us to where they grew up and showed us the natural environment they grew up in... it could work
That’s not part of the movie. The city isn’t some weird unique place, it’s just a big city. The Hopps family lives on a farm in a rural area that even has high speed train service, not a natural environment.
 

Chester&Hester Enthusiast

Well-Known Member
That is not what AK is. While Pandora and Beastly Kingdomme (as proposed) are fantasy, they still portray their inhabitant fantasy fauna as behaving in a way consistent with the animals that do exist in our world (essentially using cryptozoological standards), and they are juxtaposed with a human presence (RDA settlers in Pandora, presumably medieval humans in Beastly) to explore the relationship between them.

Zootopia is some weird parallel dimension where, for all intents and purposes, animals don't exist. Every species is sentient and believes in human ethics, morality, social constructs, business practices, politics, etc. despite humans never having existed. It doesn't tell us anything about our relationship to animals nor about our relationship to the environment. Your statement that they live in environmental harmony via "cityscape biomes" is true, but only because the story says it is so, not because there is any real suggestion as to how people might achieve something similar. It's just magitech.

It's insane to me how obvious and basic this is, and yet so many people are just like, "ZoOToPia hAVe aniMALS MeaNS GooD in DaK!!1!"

I truly don't get it.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
That’s not part of the movie. The city isn’t some weird unique place, it’s just a big city. The Hopps family lives on a farm in a rural area that even has high speed train service, not a natural environment.
While I don’t think Zootopia fits in animal kingdom I do think it’s a very interesting environment that has screamed theme park land to me since 2016. if anything I wish they would expand the Shanghai area with more of the different districts.
 
Last edited:

Chester&Hester Enthusiast

Well-Known Member
As Beastly was never fully realized we don't know what it would have entailed. So it seemingly could have included the fantastical idea of sentient animals that walk and talk like humans do.

But again playing devil advocate here, humans are animals too. :)

The plans were completely finalized and have been (mostly) available to the public for many many years, what do you mean?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom