Maybe you weren't referring to my post but I want to clarify when I said that CV19 will never be fully gone I wasn't suggesting that anyone not get vaccinated. I think that all who can get vaccinated, should get fully vaccinated. Please don’t think or suggest that what I said had any other meaning than that the virus is here to stay just like the flu and we all have to learn to live with it. This may require yearly vaccinations just like we get the flu shot annually.
I’m not sure why a comment about women who are pregnant getting the vaccine was taken so harshly, please explain. Please enlighten me what the second part of the sentence is supposed to be. For me there was no “second part”.
I don't know if it was you or not. It's a theme of many posters and talking points. Which creates a communication problem. Someone who repeats the first part of a talking point, and leaves out any additional nuance or context isn't communicating well. They're repeating the the talking point part, and with no other information present, the assumption everyone else hears is the rest of the talking point.
So, "COVID will never go away, so there's no sense getting a vaccine" is a talking point and perspective of "vaccine hesitancy". It's a bad take and stupid, up there with "it's not 100% so why bother making anything even a little better". Then, someone will later post just "COVID will never go away" with not other information. Even if they don't mean it with the rest of that statement, it's too late. The rest is what everyone hears. A communication problem. Either they really did mean the rest of that, "so why bother", or they're not communicating what they really mean and everyone is getting a message they didn't intend.
Likewise, all the pregnant and fertility talking points are "we don't know the impact the vaccine will have on pregnancy or fertility, so don't get the vaccine". Leaving off the second part implies that the post is being coy but that's what they really mean. A communication problem again. Since the statement is completely false.
Unless that's what someone really means, which is a bad take and incorrect for both.
Maybe there are so many no vaxers because of those who were so against the vaccines when they first came out. If you look back a few months and remember who the people were that said they would never get the vaccine you will see that those same people are now in prominent positions and are now pushing the vaccine. Interesting how in a few months time they have changed their minds and want everyone to get vaxed. I guess this is a perfect example of being careful of what you say because it can come back and bite you.
This take completely drops all the nuance and twists the facts incorrectly too. This is not what happened at all. It does however match with the original communication problem above of not saying the end but just implying it. So, maybe it was you then. Or, you're communication to everyone that there are "concerns and implications and LOTS of reasons to not get the vaccine", but being coy about it to not actually say those things outright.
There's tons of posts like "oh you should get the vaccine, but there's all these concerns and issues and you should TOTALLY do your own research first and make sure that none of those is an issue to you specifically". They're all junk. All a way to put a veneer of "get a vaccine" on a message that is really the reverse. The number of reasons to not get the vaccine is amazingly small and applies to very few people. All of whom are very aware of their restrictions and not doing some random internet search to learn about an issue.