DisneyCane
Well-Known Member
I said "a good portion" not the majority. Although I have no proof, I would speculate that Trump latched onto what Fauci said as justification for his own mask ambivalence. It was certainly Trump's attitude that led to the majority of the anti-mask movement. However, Fauci's words gave people something to point to in order to justify it.You guys can believe what you want, but there is no way you will convince me the majority of the anti-mask movement was based on that. I stand by my statement, that’s delusional. The anti-Fauci sentiment is purely and totally based on politics. Trump supporters felt he hurt Trump’s chances of being re-elected.
I didn't really think Fauci hurt Trump's chances of being re-elected. It would have hurt his chances if he listened to Fauci 100% or always did the complete opposite. If he listened to Fauci 100% it would have hurt the economy (Trump's strongest issue to that point although we'll never know if a recession would have begun anyway) even more and if he had gone opposite of Fauci on everything, the spread and deaths would have been worse. Either option hurt his chances with respect to Fauci.
Personally, the second this Trump supporter realized that COVID couldn't be contained to small geographic areas I knew the chance of Trump getting reelected was less than 25% and that was before all of the unrest over the summer.