Then why are Park execs given high accolades for their excellent leadership? ( Weiss, D'Amaro, Colglazier, Kalogridis, Ouimet, Grier, Staggs, Rasulo, Chapek, the list can go on and on. I agree with the short term gain. The lives and compensation for these execs are what can you do for me Now.I don't think the company as a whole has been run poorly, but I think the parks have been. Maintenance levels, food quality, and so on have declined tremendously over the past couple of decades (which started with Eisner, but Iger certainly didn't do anything to fix it). Budgets have ballooned to insane levels and they still end up slashing things because they can't get them done for that gigantic price.
More importantly, (and this applies to the company as a whole to an extent) a lot of decisions have been made for short-term gain without much thought (or at least much care) for how they might affect things long-term. That's actually understandable to an extent, because their job in the current economy (for better or worse) is to maximize shareholder gains right now, not to worry about what might happen 15 years down the road when they will likely no longer be in their current jobs anyways. But it's certainly not good for parks fans who of course are concerned about what things will look like 10-15 years from now.
The company isn't on the verge of financial ruin, though. That's silly.
Last edited: