News Splash Mountain retheme to Princess and the Frog - Tiana's Bayou Adventure

Status
Not open for further replies.

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
Or if you want Laurence to marry into the LeBoeuf family, why not just kill Big Daddy as soon as they met. You’ve got a voodoo doll of the man, just stab the thing in the heart and it’ll look like he had a heart attack. Charlotte seeks comfort in the arms of Naveen, proceed to empty the accounts.

This would make too much sense :)

If they did this the movie wouldn’t last very long.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
I mean...if you are already going to retheme splash...why not go all the way?

I’m not saying this should or will be done but it makes sense.
I'd like to formally replace the following two beacons previously assigned to me:

  • it's a small world should move to EPCOT
  • Toy Story Land should have integrated a Speedway style attraction in and around Slinky Dog Dash
With the following:

  • Liberty Square up to Splash Mountain should be re-themed to New Orleans Square
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
I'd like to formally replace the following two beacons previously assigned to me:

  • it's a small world should move to EPCOT
  • Toy Story Land should have integrated a Speedway style attraction in and around Slinky Dog Dash
With the following:

  • Liberty Square up to Splash Mountain should be re-themed to New Orleans Square
I much preferred moving Small World to Epcot, because that opened up a huge spot for an appropriate Pinocchio E-Ticket.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
Nah, Frozen, Tangled and Beauty and the Beast are going there in my head.
Frozen is in Epcot. I’m vetoing Tangled because it is the most boring snooze of a movie Disney’s ever made. And BatB thematically is land locked a ways away from the Small World. Unless they split the building into two rides (Pinocchio and BatB), with the Entrance for the BatB ride where the Village Haus washrooms currently are.

I guess you could retheme Village Haus to Red Rose, but three BatB restaurants is pretty excessive.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
How will they even get away with cancelling the WDW conversion in this social climate? I feel that it will go away eventually even if it is cancelled in the short/middle term.
“Splash Mountain features important characters from Black American Folklore. After much deliberation, we’ve realized it would be a disservice to completely remove this tribute to important heritage. As the world situation improves, we will continue to develop more stories with diverse backgrounds into our films and theme parks. We will also look for a more appropriate way to bring Tiana and her friends to Walt Disney World. The Princess and the Frog makeover of Splash Mountain will still proceed in Disneyland when the time is right.”
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
Frozen is in Epcot. I’m vetoing Tangled because it is the most boring snooze of a movie Disney’s ever made. And BatB thematically is land locked a ways away from the Small World. Unless they split the building into two rides (Pinocchio and BatB), with the Entrance for the BatB ride where the Village Haus washrooms currently are.

I guess you could retheme Village Haus to Red Rose, but three BatB restaurants is pretty excessive.
Oh, I'm getting rid of VillageHaus is well to solve the Beauty and the Beast problem. I'm perfectly content with Tangled being the Snuggly Duckling Restaurant with no attraction. I'm with you that Tangled was "meh" but the Snuggly Duckling was the best part of that movie.
 

Brer Oswald

Well-Known Member
Oh, I'm getting rid of VillageHaus is well to solve the Beauty and the Beast problem. I'm perfectly content with Tangled being the Snuggly Duckling Restaurant with no attraction. I'm with you that Tangled was "meh" but the Snuggly Duckling was the best part of that movie.
Maybe it is the best part of the movie. I’m not entirely sure. I fell asleep both times I watched it.
 

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
I didn't like Tangled either, but I actually do think it could make an excellent ride. Just because a movie is bad doesn't mean a ride based on it is going to also be bad. And likewise not all good movies sound like good ride concepts.

For example, I absolutely adore Ratatouille. But I never thought it would lend itself well to a ride format. It has an incredible story and characters, but the environments aren't very visually interesting. It's predominantly quite bland industrial kitchens and other ordinary looking buildings (only with some brief flashes of more classical Parisian architecture). Ratatouille is a movie I love watching, but had no interest whatsoever in seeing adapted into a theme park environment. And as it turns out, the ride confirmed my assumptions. There are plenty of Disney movies that I really love but don't think have much potential as rides.

On the opposite side of the coin, I dislike Tangled and don't like revisiting its story. But visually I think it lends itself VERY well to a theme park ride. It has lovely environments. If given to talented imagineers with a good budget, it could be an incredible ride. They're currently building a Tangled ride at Tokyo Disneysea as part of the Fantasy Springs expansion. It's a boat ride with a relatively smallish show building (38,900 reportedly, similar to Epcot's Mexico ride, but I dunno how many levels it has or if there are any drops). So it doesn't seem like a full-on E ticket. Even still, the Asian parks often get assigned larger budgets and far more talented imagineers than the other parks, so hopefully it'll be a fun little ride regardless. We'll see.

Avatar turned out to be a similar situation to how I feel about Tangled. I don't like the movie at all but the visuals were gorgeous and lent themselves well to a theme park experience if well executed. And thankfully the land ended up being gorgeous as well. I have some issues with the rides, but that's largely because I don't care for simulators and the over saturation of video screens in modern rides. And consider the boat ride too short and lacking in animatronics. Not really the IP's fault though, there's still a ton to love about the land as a whole.
 

EagleScout610

Owner of a RKF - Resting Kermit Face
Premium Member
unnamed (2).jpg
unnamed (1).jpg
unnamed.jpg
scene10-v2_orig.jpg

Found these photos of a Tangled Overlay for Splash. Wonder how close we were to getting this instead of PATF
 

Haymarket2008

Well-Known Member

FettFan

Well-Known Member
I much preferred moving Small World to Epcot, because that opened up a huge spot for an appropriate Pinocchio E-Ticket.

Or a Villains dark ride.
QueenSnowWhite.png

I’m still salty over losing SWSA.


I still think my Tom Sawyer Island -> Ile D’Orleans plan would be a great addition to Magic Kingdom.

Brand new land, plenty of space to build a Louisiana Bayou walk-thru, a PATF ride, Tiana’s Palace restaurant, and plenty of street food stalls/counter service.
 

tirian

Well-Known Member
Or a Villains dark ride.
QueenSnowWhite.png

I’m still salty over losing SWSA.


I still think my Tom Sawyer Island -> Ile D’Orleans plan would be a great addition to Magic Kingdom.

Brand new land, plenty of space to build a Louisiana Bayou walk-thru, a PATF ride, Tiana’s Palace restaurant, and plenty of street food stalls/counter service.
Maybe it’s time to dust off the plans for Villain Mt. and put it in Germany at Epcot, and just say it’s close enough because Grimm Fairy Tales. ;):D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom