• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

EPCOT Remy's Ratatouille Adventure coming to Epcot

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
I would agree. I enjoyed it in WDSP. But, it's a D-Ticket.

I will also say, the more I look at the flats. They could work. It's more that it feels like they are missing a layer. So, it makes the flats feel very (actually) flat and 2D. If they added another layer of facades, it would add a ton to this.
 

NobodyElse

Well-Known Member
One of the few positives from the team of original DCA was removing the overhead power lines.
1582411933283.png
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
I can totally see where you would find the concept art misleading. I know that area (onstage and backstage) pretty well. So, I think I had a good reference point. But it could imply more and still be accurate. Especially if you generally compare it to the WDSP area. Not saying that's a good comparison, but I think people would do that naturally to some extent.

Now back to making my @realBobChapek voo doo doll...
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
I can totally see where you would find the concept art misleading. I know that area (onstage and backstage) pretty well. So, I think I had a good reference point. But it could imply more and still be accurate. Especially if you generally compare it to the WDSP area. Not saying that's a good comparison, but I think people would do that naturally to some extent.

Now back to making my @realBobChapek voo doo doll...

that cracked me up, I would love one as well.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Now there's an unbiased source.

Put me in camp D-

Well, industry insiders have usually insisted we use WDI designation (for the more recent rides... older rides have a history of actual tickets showing what class of ride they were... which sometimes changed).

A wildly popular C Ticket that always has long lines doesn't make it an E Ticket.

And conversely, an E Ticket that isn't popular doesn't make it a C Ticket.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Now there's an unbiased source.

Put me in camp D-
Indeed - the scale is there, but I didn't feel like any of the show elements congealed to achieve an experience that lives up to its size. Everything feels at least a little half baked, like they had the right idea but didn't commit to seeing the production through in a way that makes for a well-integrated, seamless experience. There are a few too many instances where it feels like the guests are asked to make allowances for poor showmanship that WDI should have accounted for.

I'd probably give it a D+ just for sheer ambition of scale, but there's definitely something rough-draft-y about it.

Building a more meaningful motion base into the ride vehicles, and removing the "floor problem" should have been priorities for the Epcot clone. I think that could have stepped the ride up into actual Immersive E-Ticket territory. And is it really too much to ask for AN Animatronic? Even just one of Remy at the end?
 

A Noble Fish

Well-Known Member
I would call it a mediocre D ticket.
In this environment it’s a high D.
I would agree. I enjoyed it in WDSP. But, it's a D-Ticket.

I will also say, the more I look at the flats. They could work. It's more that it feels like they are missing a layer. So, it makes the flats feel very (actually) flat and 2D. If they added another layer of facades, it would add a ton to this.
Now there's an unbiased source.

Put me in camp D-
Indeed - the scale is there, but I didn't feel like any of the show elements congealed to achieve an experience that lives up to its size. Everything feels at least a little half baked, like they had the right idea but didn't commit to seeing the production through in a way that makes for a well-integrated, seamless experience. There are a few too many instances where it feels like the guests are asked to make allowances for poor showmanship that WDI should have accounted for.

I'd probably give it a D+ just for sheer ambition of scale, but there's definitely something rough-draft-y about it.

Building a more meaningful motion base into the ride vehicles, and removing the "floor problem" should have been priorities for the Epcot clone. I think that could have stepped the ride up into actual Immersive E-Ticket territory. And is it really too much to ask for AN Animatronic? Even just one of Remy at the end?
It's an E-ticket. You guys are seriously short selling the first new E-ticket at the park in 15 years...

Rise and Shanghai Pirates are in a different league, and it's not fair to compare anything to them unless they are going for a scale of similar caliber. It's a solid E, but it has its share of legitimate grievances that its LPS peers don't, but calling it a D isn't exactly fair. E-? The scale is there, it's just not as well-executed as say Hunny Hunt over in Tokyo.

I'm personally excited!
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom