JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
Clickbait posted an article saying that a new monorail fleet is coming soon to WDW. Can any of our trusted insiders say anything about this?
You mean that OP?The OP is very pertinent. Maybe there will be an answer soon.
Clickbait posted an article saying that a new monorail fleet is coming soon to WDW. Can any of our trusted insiders say anything about this?
You mean that OP?The OP is very pertinent. Maybe there will be an answer soon.
Well did ECV really exist when they began designing these units in the 80sClearly they didn't anticipate anyone using any kind of wheelchair, stroller, ECV otherwise they would have designed them with a different door assembly, and being flat with the platform, and also not initially having the fold up seat compartment in the centers of each cab.
Not really, but I don’t think the force of an ECV with full weight striking a door should’ve been more than what these doors should’ve been engineered to withstand.Well did ECV really exist when they began designing these units in the 80s
Again the ones we have used are 200-250. I checked one we rented and it was under 250. That was my point. Your ECV number is higher than the ones we've rented.The ECV unloaded weighs 350lbs. Let's take your low end estimate that the person weighs 200lbs, that's still 550lbs of motorized mass pushing against a thin fiberglass door which is bolted in 4 places. What do you think would happen? This has nothing the age of the monorails and everything to do with the unique situation of the accident.
Well did ECV really exist when they began designing these units in the 80s
Not really, but I don’t think the force of an ECV with full weight striking a door should’ve been more than what these doors should’ve been engineered to withstand.
I’ve also seen EVC’s hit these doors really hard without them falling off. So there’s definitely more going on here. Trust me if these things couldn’t withstand an impact from an ECV we would be seeing this incident on at least a weekly basis.
Haha YES!!! I learned something today.
Haha YES!!! I learned something today.
Not really, but I don’t think the force of an ECV with full weight striking a door should’ve been more than what these doors should’ve been engineered to withstand.
I’ve also seen EVC’s hit these doors really hard without them falling off. So there’s definitely more going on here. Trust me if these things couldn’t withstand an impact from an ECV we would be seeing this incident on at least a weekly basis.
They removed the straps on the monorail a LONG time ago. It wouldn’t matter because to use them a wheelchair had to be positioned facing forward or reverse. Most scooter have to go in sideways.Does anyone know why the ECV's are not strapped down like they are on Disney buses? Maybe the person accidentally put it in reverse. Still scary. Without strapping them down this could have happen while in transit.
This is where people underestimate the potential impact. Some ECV's can hit 5mph. The impact force of a moving object hitting a stationary object is F = (0.5 * m * v^2) ÷ d (where m is mass, v is velocity, and d is the distance the moving object will travel before it stops. Calculating d is another formula, so let's just say an ECV will travel 0.1m on collision before stopping, for the sake of argument. So for a 550lb ECV (250kg) and a velocity of 5mph (8 kph or 2.2 meters/sec) we get: F = (0.5 * 250 * 4.84) / 0.1, or 6,051 newtons, which is equivalent to 1360 pounds-force. Not a small amount of force.An ECV can reach a speeds of several mph. It seems as this was not someone simply leaning or falling against the door, this appears to be a heavy object impacting the door at considerable speed which in turn exceeded door hardware connection's strength causing ti to break.
Take a higher than average force, bolts not up to spec, and possibly material fatigue.. you would have the perfect storm for this type of failure.This is where people underestimate the potential impact. Some ECV's can hit 5mph. The impact force of a moving object hitting a stationary object is F = (0.5 * m * v^2) ÷ d (where m is mass, v is velocity, and d is the distance the moving object will travel before it stops. Calculating d is another formula, so let's just say an ECV will travel 0.1m on collision before stopping, for the sake of argument. So for a 550lb ECV (250kg) and a velocity of 5mph (8 kph or 2.2 meters/sec) we get: F = (0.5 * 250 * 4.84) / 0.1, or 6,051 newtons, which is equivalent to 1360 pounds-force. Not a small amount of force.
If anyone is more versed in physics and math than I, please check my work.... I'm definitely not an expert here...
Not really, although on the resort monorail you would try to load them so that someone didn’t have to get out and back in at one of the stops.Is there a specific direction in which you loaded the ECVs based on their destination so they wouldn’t have to back out. Example on the resort line enter on the right side head first to exit straight out at the MK?
I could easily see one of those things set to full power going up the load ramp and through the car at full speed.
The OP is very pertinent. Maybe there will be an answer soon.
The best type of stage. When it’s not bringing traumatic flashbacks of college physicsah great, we've reached the physics calculation stage already
Now calculate the force it would take to shear a grade 5 bolt of 3/8 diameter and take the other three out enough so the door falls off the train.This is where people underestimate the potential impact. Some ECV's can hit 5mph. The impact force of a moving object hitting a stationary object is F = (0.5 * m * v^2) ÷ d (where m is mass, v is velocity, and d is the distance the moving object will travel before it stops. Calculating d is another formula, so let's just say an ECV will travel 0.1m on collision before stopping, for the sake of argument. So for a 550lb ECV (250kg) and a velocity of 5mph (8 kph or 2.2 meters/sec) we get: F = (0.5 * 250 * 4.84) / 0.1, or 6,051 newtons, which is equivalent to 1360 pounds-force. Not a small amount of force.
If anyone is more versed in physics and math than I, please check my work.... I'm definitely not an expert here...
Nothing I haven't mentioned before.Is this confirmation..
And perhaps never considered them being run a decade past their life expectancy?Parts failing and parts being damaged are very different scenarios. I’m reasonably confident the designers of those trains never considered several hundred pounds of motorized vehicle with a several hundred pound guest driving it into the doors.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.