Reason
New Member
Exceedingly longtime lurker, never poster here.
To help alleviate some anxiety over seating issues: I am 6' 2", 320 with a 52 inch waist and I found SDMT seating to not be that restrictive. I only wear a 32 inch length pant however so my shorter legs may have helped me. I was surprised {pleasantly} that the bar locked without being down to my beltline.
As for the ride: Think of it as a dark ride, not a thrill coaster, and you will be very happy. I see this ride being popular for a long time. That said it will take a lot of Disney PR money to keep media focus on this IF Universal PR can capitalize on the much larger additions they are opening down I-4.
To help alleviate some anxiety over seating issues: I am 6' 2", 320 with a 52 inch waist and I found SDMT seating to not be that restrictive. I only wear a 32 inch length pant however so my shorter legs may have helped me. I was surprised {pleasantly} that the bar locked without being down to my beltline.
As for the ride: Think of it as a dark ride, not a thrill coaster, and you will be very happy. I see this ride being popular for a long time. That said it will take a lot of Disney PR money to keep media focus on this IF Universal PR can capitalize on the much larger additions they are opening down I-4.
It wasn't super uncomfortable, but it was really snug! And I remember thinking, I know there are people with wider hips than me, how are they going to fit? That does come across as being poor design -- and that is sad because the rest of the ride is well thought out.