nytimez
Well-Known Member
Interesting post. I agree with your last sentence 100%. However, for me, if I had seen it happening as you described in points 1 and 2, I would be reassured by DCL. The way this is coming out now is not reassuring to say the least. I'd say they chose the most damaging approach from a PR perspective as well. JMO.
Oh, I don't disagree.
It is more damaging in many ways and not reassuring -- but only to those of us who actually hear (or see or read) the story. The approach they took ensured the story would reach fewer people. And that, from their point of view, makes it potentially less damaging. It is a short-sighted point of view that can definitely backfire, IMO, but that is (what I believe to be, and for a fairly good reason) their point of view on this and similar stories.