I'm new around here. Is it standard practice to just insult people instead of having an honest discussion?Feel free to enjoy that delusion if it gives you comfort. No point in arguing further.
I'm new around here. Is it standard practice to just insult people instead of having an honest discussion?Feel free to enjoy that delusion if it gives you comfort. No point in arguing further.
I'm new around here. Is it standard practice to just insult people instead of having an honest discussion?
The only facts that I have are those that were in the story linked from the OP. If you have something that refutes those facts, the rest of us would love to see it. Otherwise, you are welcome to challenge my posts based on those facts or ignore my posts.Facts are stubborn things. You can either accept them, or invent your own - you seem to have chosen the latter option. No real need to discuss it further.
uh...welcome to the forum of peace and love.I'm new around here. Is it standard practice to just insult people instead of having an honest discussion?
Done. When asked about the reason for canceling, I said I was upset at the handling of the incident. The res agent was calm and said she was sorry to hear that. I wonder if they told them to be prepared or if others have canceled? She was only slightly thrown off.
The only facts that I have are what was in the story linked from the OP. If you have something that refutes those facts, the rest of us would love to see it. Otherwise, you are welcome to challenge my posts based on those facts or ignore my posts.
Skyway's point was a good one. They had a reasonable belief that a crime had occurred. My initial post on this subject actually opined on the reasons that that call didn't happen.
That doesn't change the fact that your timeline was wrong and that your assertion that they had confirmed prior to sailing that a crime had been committed isn't supported by the facts. One would expect more from someone with your nom de plume.
I assume that you are working up to a point.Again, facts are stubborn things:
At 3:57 p.m., the 11-year-old from Brazil led the officer to the spot where she encountered the suspect and “appeared to be uncomfortable when she walked me to the elevator where (the crew member) touched and kissed her,” the officer wrote in her report.
The security officer then retrieved and reviewed the video of the elevator lobby outside the car where the attack occurred and confirmed the actions of a uniformed crew member were consistent with the 11-year-old’s retelling of the story.
I assume that you are working up to a point.
From the information that you posted, you can see that nothing was confirmed at 3:57, as you previously asserted. The video was pulled and reviewed after 3:57.
Also, you will note that the video was of the elevator lobby, not the elevator. As such, they appear to have confirmed that a CM was where the child alleged, not that the video actually showed the attack.
It should be noted that I am not for a moment taking the position that the CM did not commit the crime. Our disagreement is regarding what security confirmed to be true and when.
As I suggested to someone previously this is not an isolated incident to Disney and if this is a concern for you I would advise that you never take a cruise with any cruise line. You only heard about this one because the news got wind of it. I would suggest you plan on alternate vacation experiences until you do not have children with you.
Again, I assume that you are doing something other than arguing my point.For emphasis:
confirmed the actions of a uniformed crew member were consistent with the 11-year-old’s retelling of the story
Again, I assume that you are doing something other than arguing my point.
Dontcha think that if they meant 'confirmed that the attack did occur' that that is what they would say? Instead they state that the actions of the CM, as viewed from the elevator lobby, were consistent with the child's story.
Imagine that the child's story was that she entered the elevator and then the CM entered. He then attacked her and left the elevator. Now imagine that the video from the elevator lobby showed her enter the elevator, followed by a CM who left the elevator thirty seconds or so later. Wouldn't that video confirm that the actions of the CM were consistent with the child's story?
It's not within the purview of private security (i.e. non law enforcement) to conduct a criminal investigation. It's not up to private security to try to confirm or refute a crime. It's not up to private security to waste an hour and a half interviewing a molested child, writing a report, reviewing video and finding a manager to interview the perp.
A guest promptly reported a felony child molestation. At that point, it's the responsibility of private security to call the damn police. The police are the professionals who are paid and charged under the law to investigate crimes.
Disney's behavior in this incident was egregious in every respect.
They failed to report the crime until the next day.
They allowed the perp to roam the ship for 3 hours after he was identified.
They paid his travel expenses home, saying they were "honoring" his contract. Horse squeeze, there's no honor in any of this. The only travel expenses TWDC should have been paying were the victim's expenses to come back and testify in this pedophile's trial.
To make it worse, Disney has now lied to the media about the timeline of events.
And by the way, pedophilia is rarely a one and done event. Chances are pretty darn good that this creep is continuing his "hobby" back in his home country.
I couldn't watch the video earlier as it would just spin. I've now seen it on another site. I will give you that the CM actions are consistent with the girls story although the video is from the wrong angle to actually confirm the actions happened.The video is in the story, I am assuming you watched it. If not, I would suggest you do so.
I'm a travel agent as well and I used to work on cruise ships which is why I am telling you not to travel on any cruise lines at all. You are twice as likely to be raped on a cruise ship than in the average city. Crime statistics for most things are about double the average of similar crimes on land and few get reported, even fewer prosecuted.I do not have children. I am actually shocked at how many people with children think how Disney handled this was OK. I just choose not to vacation there at this time. I do not like how they handled this. Maybe they will make a statement and explain. Sure hope so.
Also, I am a travel agent so I really try to use companies I am confident in and travel to places that are good companies.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.