Well no, I'm rational. I understand that economics and creativity work hand in hand for this business. You have to be a realist. Yes, Disney COULD tear down all of Dinoland and make an amazing dinosaur themed section of their park that is forever compared to their competitor. Just like they COULD make 3 new theme parks because CREATIVITY. They certain have enough ideas + IP to fill 3 more parks if they really wanted to. The proper is, that's not a realistic or good idea. Every Eisner needs Wells just like Walt needed Roy to keep things sustainable or you blow all of your money and the stock crashes when investors realize you have no idea what you're doing and can't justify a huge expense. Staff would get laid off especially higher paying jobs that would not be as essential during stagnation periods like Imagineers. Then where is your "creative sense"? Economics is more than just === make money. It's about how you can balance all the aspects of the company to allow creative to have more capital to spend. Creativity costs money. You can go live in Fantasyland if you want to think that Disney can just write blank checks and say "do whatever we dont' really care".