psherman42
Well-Known Member
And you’re basing yours entirely on concept art. Which if you look at past projects HAS changed. New Fantasyland changes from its original concept art. Pretty much all of Epcots reimagining changed from its original concept art. They literally couldn’t even put a small fountain in the center of world celebration but instead put a planter. It’s not ridiculous to assume that this one will change too and leave mostly concrete.But you said that’s what most of it looks like. And know you’re basing your entire opinion on assuming that plans will change for the worst and you’ll be left with nothing but concrete and cars? I get being cynically but don’t be ridiculous.
Not really. And the point is that they are more than capable of planting a mature setting.
Give me one example of a recent project of that Disney has done well to give any confidence that they are capable of doing a project of this magnitude well. They are ripping out part of the soul of MK for an IP that does not fit the area (no matter how much mental gymnastics everyone does to try to make it so). I wouldn’t care nearly as much about this if it wasn't going in MK. But the stakes are so high, replacing pretty much the only part of the park that actually FEELS like a park. I am not confident they can do it justice and leave enough water in the area to make the loss of RoA less deep.
Last edited: