• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

It is sad we were only expected a thin facade over the Dino institute.



That being said. Since it is a retheme of existing everything. Shouldn't the theming be the one thing that impresses the most?

This seems like the same company and process we went through with Tiana and EPCOT.
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really think you have a source. You’re just basing things off concept art and comparing them to blue sky that obviously look different while also being quite incredibly vague in what will differ.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
Enjoy it by all means. But realistically. Expect the status quo of where the company is at. Hopefully the staging and such is just a fun time. But I think people need to keep expectations a bit in check.

Thanks for the heads up. It could still be a great ride - I like Mission Breakout, and that was a retheme. But now I won't be expecting 30 years worth of creative improvements like I was for, say, Paris' Pirates & Mansion in '92.

(Oh my goodness! The time between Paris Pirates opening and the original DL Pirates opening is LESS than the time between DL Indy and DAK Indy!!!)
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the heads up. It could still be a great ride - I like Mission Breakout, and that was a retheme. But now I won't be expecting 30 years worth of creative improvements like I was for, say, Paris' Pirates & Mansion in '92.

(Oh my goodness! The time between Paris Pirates opening and the original DL Pirates opening is LESS than the time between DL Indy and DAK Indy!!!)

Yeah. Wild isn't it? Something else wild is that Winnie The Pooh has is next year going to surpass how long Mr. Toad was there.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really think you have a source. You’re just basing things off concept art and comparing them to blue sky that obviously look different while also being quite incredibly vague in what will differ.

Well I don't have a lot of details and I am not pretending to. I am not saying anything I don't know. But what I do know I stated in terms of scenic differences and how DL's and and TDS' will differ with their grand open scenes and temple interactions. It is not going to be that 1:1 in all those ways people are hoping.

It is ok. I don't take it personally.

I am glad you are honest.
 
Last edited:

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
If the brand isn’t worth paying to keep it on your streaming platform, is it worth the retheme?
Comcast/Universal doesn't have Marvel IP on Peacock, and yet have Marvel IP in their park.

Synergy is great, but it doesn't always happen because of historical selling off of licenses to different companies and then issues of mergers.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Comcast/Universal doesn't have Marvel IP on Peacock, and yet have Marvel IP in their park.

Synergy is great, but it doesn't always happen because of historical selling off of licenses to different companies and then issues of mergers.
i guess it depends on what happened behind the scenes…. I’m assuming Disney didn’t want to continue paying the licensing.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Very true! I actually thought they already had
Me too, turns out we were right. It is a part of Lucasfilm. Distribution rights of the first four films themselves are still under Paramount.

So probably not worth Disney offering for that difference, and prob Paramount would rather hold on if the pay was not a lot.

Disney probably does not see a lot of home video or streaming value on it to pay much for just the older Indy movies
 

Orange is the new Red

Well-Known Member
Well I don't have a lot of details and I am not pretending to. I am not saying anything I don't know. But what I do know I stated in terms of scenic differences and how DL's and and TDS' will differ with their grand open scenes and temple interactions. It is not going to be that 1:1 in all those ways people are hoping.

It is ok. I don't take it personally.

I am glad you are honest.
But you do kind of pretend too…
You are on here giving advice, and making statements like you are in the know. Apparently you know nothing.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
But you do kind of pretend too…
You are on here giving advice, and making statements like you are in the know. Apparently you know nothing.

I have seen some interior plans for the ride and I know the model has changed. It is not on the scale of Cali or Tokyo inside or out.

All I have shared and all I claim to know. It is not much but I wanted to share.

Your attack does not make me know of more. Nor does it make me know less.
 
Last edited:

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I don’t think it’s a requirement that they gut to produce one main open chamber to have an impressive temple. It’s an impressive initial reveal but seeing other vehicles also removes some immersion and sense of peril.

That is fair as well. I just present what I have seen in more recent iterations. The scale is slightly less in many aspects when compared to the other two IJA's. Like I stated in an earlier post, I think that if there is less of that, you could potentially have a more intense feel through temple passages.
 

britain

Well-Known Member
So no giant open room then? That’s a shame, but understandable considering the structure. I hope it won’t feel like “all hallways all the time”.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
That is fair as well. I just present what I have seen in more recent iterations. The scale is slightly less in many aspects when compared to the other two IJA's. Like I stated in an earlier post, I think that if there is less of that, you could potentially have a more intense feel through temple passages.
Yes. It will all depend on execution and, critically, maintenance. That huge room in DL is impressive when all of the effects work.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Yes. It will all depend on execution and, critically, maintenance. That huge room in DL is impressive when all of the effects work.

Just seems sort of silly when yhe way people like to cope with losing CTX is it relied heavily on coordoors in the dark to get more darkened corridors then IJA. A critique that could hold true here.
Hopefully not more of the same. What I saw can't convey lighting grids or programming either.

Just to reiterate, the many changes this way are not a vomplete deal breaker for my taste. They do raise status quo concerns and Why I mentioned earlier, some will certainly be disappointed if they are expecting a 1.1 to the others or grander in scale.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
The rumor I heard is that Indiana Jones is going to take the place of Dr. Seeker. The rest of the story and the ride itself will remain untouched, save for an Indiana Jones AA at the end.

;)
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Just seems sort of silly when yhe way people like to cope with losing CTX is it relied heavily on coordoors in the dark to get more darkened corridors then IJA. A critique that could hold true here.
Hopefully not more of the same. What I saw can't convey lighting grids or programming either.
It depends on how much they’re willing to spend on sets. Done correctly, you could have an awesome maze of passages.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom