James Alucobond
Well-Known Member
Which I do genuinely appreciate and think contributes to the discussion. I was responding to a post from before you did so.I posted the FL statutes that govern competitive bidding.
Which I do genuinely appreciate and think contributes to the discussion. I was responding to a post from before you did so.I posted the FL statutes that govern competitive bidding.
I believe the District said the total value of the contract is less than $1 million, BUT they still didn't provide the actual amount and $999k would still be truthfully "under $1 million." But the statute you cited earlier says the value must be below $35k and there's no way that the work being done could possibly cost that little - especially when the District is being so cagey about the amount. It wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that most of the Board members aren't even aware of that rule, but both Gilzean and Figgers should both know it. As for the others, ignorance is no excuse. If they're that clueless about how local governments have to operate then that's just further proof of their lack of qualifications to hold their positions and - combined with nonsense like this contract - cements the punitive nature of the Board's creation and appointment.
I agree... but at the same time, that's not the standard that was used to bring RCID down
Sorry, I don't agree on lowering your standards just because some tools do stupid stuff first.
Not fire, but there have been a lot of people leaving since the new board took over. Lots of retirements.Did the Board fire ALL the RCID staff? If not, some of them should have been aware of the state competitive bid statute.
They just keep making themselves look worse don’t they![]()
Disney Says DeSantis' Oversight District Is "Dodging Obligations" to Produce Discovery, Asks Judge for Continuance
Disney has filed a motion for continuance in the state-level trial where it is a defendant against the Tourism Oversight Districtblogmickey.com
…the District’s motion for summary judgment argues that, “[p]ursuant to the Development Agreement, any other property owner in the District that wants to further develop its land must first obtain an assignment of development rights from Disney and then obtain written approval from Disney before using those development rights.” Mot. at 8-9 (emphasis added). This assertion only begs questions: Is there any property owner in the District “that wants to further develop its land”? Is there any property owner that could obtain “development rights” to “us[e]”? Some property owners, for example, may be subject to deeds that limit the extent to which new development rights may be received. Because the District has shirked its discovery obligations and Disney has not yet had sufficient time to complete discovery in any event, Disney lacks the opportunity to submit facts demonstrating a dispute as to whether any assertedly “affected” property owner was actually “affected.”
Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista are still city governments that need to be elected by residents. So they will be staying.Does anyone know what will happen to the houses in Royal Oak or Bay Lake Court? Does the City Mayors etc still live in them?
would the new Board fill those roles once the current peoples terms are up? I believe most of those people were selected by Disney.Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista are still city governments that need to be elected by residents. So they will be staying.
Does anyone know what will happen to the houses in Royal Oak or Bay Lake Court? Does the City Mayors etc still live in them?
Paging @LAKid53. Can anything be done outside of the legislature to change the current municipalities?would the new Board fill those roles once the current peoples terms are up? I believe most of those people were selected by Disney.
Disney owns the land and leases it to the residents. That continues today. The CFTOD board has zero control over who lives in the district.would the new Board fill those roles once the current peoples terms are up? I believe most of those people were selected by Disney.
What makes you think they won't?Disney owns the land and leases it to the residents. That continues today. The CFTOD board has zero control over who lives in the district.
CFTOD now has zoning control over the cities, but that doesn’t mean they can control who lives there. Disney still control who lives in Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista. CFTOD has no power to dissolve the cities. Only the Florida legislature can do that.
Because DeSantis hasn't asked them to do itWhat makes you think they won't?
He will, if it sounds woke!Because DeSantis hasn't asked them to do it
And DeSantis power has significantly deminished over the past year. Hes a lame duck at this point.Because DeSantis hasn't asked them to do it
Two main reasons why:What makes you think they won't?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.