• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

'Strange World' Disney's 2022 Animated Film

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Interestingly I did find this one that's more updated
View attachment 682002
Apparently we are in the new era? Talk about lazy naming, though I guess its hard to come up with more adjectives.

These things are very interesting to look at, thank you for sharing!

But who is coming up with these titles for the eras? Because I'm suspicious of the real meanings here.

In my mind, these later eras just read as...

"Post Rennaisance" 2000-2007 = Pretty Much Sucks Era
"Revival Era" 2008-2017 = Sucked Slightly Less, But Also Frozen, Era!
"New Era" 2018-2022 = Disney+ Is Only $8.99 Per Month Era
 

TwilightZone

Well-Known Member
But who is coming up with these titles for the eras? Because I'm suspicious of the real meanings here.
Defunctland said the exact thing in his newest video, no joke.

I think it needs to be restructured, not sure how, but the titles don't really work. Ironically, I think Disney's official one is better, but it still needs work.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Ouch! Strange World really did set records for awful box office performance...

"Disney knew it was in trouble before Strange World hit theaters. Tracking showed the movie, an original sci-fi adventure tale, opening to no more than $30 million over the five-day Thanksgiving holiday corridor, a miserable start. From there, things only got worse. Word-of-mouth was so bad that the movie’s five-day domestic opening came in at $18.9 million, meaning the film could ultimately lose $100 million or more for the studio."

Even more misery is available in the rest of the article here...

 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
I guess bolt is placed there in a historical sense. It was the first movie that was reworked under Lasseter. Or at least the most notable one.

After finding out more info about American Dog's plot....yeah I can see why.
I just read about America Dog on the Disney Wiki. A talking TV dog, a one-eyed cat and a giant radioactive rabbit on a road trip. And from the concept art, it looks like it would have featured at least one Godfather parody scene. Because I guess we just can't get enough Godfather parodies.

I know not everyone loved it, but I'm very happy we ended up with Bolt instead.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
Ouch! Strange World really did set records for awful box office performance...

"Disney knew it was in trouble before Strange World hit theaters. Tracking showed the movie, an original sci-fi adventure tale, opening to no more than $30 million over the five-day Thanksgiving holiday corridor, a miserable start. From there, things only got worse. Word-of-mouth was so bad that the movie’s five-day domestic opening came in at $18.9 million, meaning the film could ultimately lose $100 million or more for the studio."

Even more misery is available in the rest of the article here...


That reporter's statement that Raya and the Last Dragon was a "success" is BS. It flopped.


Although it STILL did a heck of a lot better than Strange World, as Raya eventually made 130 million world-wide. Still, its budget was reportedly $100 million, which I don't think includes ad buys, etc.

And of course the article ignores the elephant in the room regarding Strange World, 'cause Hollywood Reporter. But you can bet Disney knew about the elephant - because the trailers focused on the dad and HIS dad. And the dog. As opposed to...

Not that they could keep it a secret. In this internet information age, word gets around. And so it goes.
 

Magenta Panther

Well-Known Member
You guys don't get how BIG anime and manga have become. Manga is outselling american superhero comics by a LARGE margin. The young people (and millennials) eat it up!

I'm a fan of anime myself. Miyazaki's Spirited Away is one of my favorite animated movies. And then there's Demon Slayer, Full Metal Alchemist, One Piece, etc.
Princess and animals. Zootopia, Lady & the Tramp, Lilo & Stitch (to an extent). Massive money makers.
Though Pixar did make Wall E, and that did super well, so I guess sci fi animation could work if the story is really good and it starred a cute non human character.
Wall-E's success completely contradicts the claim that Strange World failed because it's sci-fi.
 

Heppenheimer

Well-Known Member
I'm a fan of anime myself. Miyazaki's Spirited Away is one of my favorite animated movies. And then there's Demon Slayer, Full Metal Alchemist, One Piece, etc.

Wall-E's success completely contradicts the claim that Strange World failed because it's sci-fi.
Wall-E is pretty much the exception (unless you also count the Despicable Me and Incredibles Franchises).

In addition to Disney, I browsed through Don Bluth, Dreamworks, Illumination, and Blue Sky. The only other sort of sci-fi movie I could find to have done well is Robots from 2005, which seems all but forgotten by now. Sci-Fi animation just seems like a tough sell to the general public, for some reason.
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
I think so. From the screen caps I've seen, the rendering is VERY detailed. And that is what costs money. It's not just like putting an upgraded video card in a single PC. Now whether it needed that much detail is questionable.
Bolt's backgrounds are very detailed but you might notice nothing is moving. It is very still. The characters however aren't much better than G-Force.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
That reporter's statement that Raya and the Last Dragon was a "success" is BS. It flopped.


Although it STILL did a heck of a lot better than Strange World, as Raya eventually made 130 million world-wide. Still, its budget was reportedly $100 million, which I don't think includes ad buys, etc.

And of course the article ignores the elephant in the room regarding Strange World, 'cause Hollywood Reporter. But you can bet Disney knew about the elephant - because the trailers focused on the dad and HIS dad. And the dog. As opposed to...

Not that they could keep it a secret. In this internet information age, word gets around. And so it goes.

I noticed that too about the article. It made me chuckle. 😄

The movie industry is becoming delusional about itself, it seems. The media covering the movie industry doesn't help, as they ignore reality and/or sugar-coat the basic facts that they don't like. It's bizarre, and seems unhealthy to me.

This Hollywood Reporter article on Strange World's historically bad box office is a perfect example.
 

RobWDW1971

Well-Known Member
I noticed that too about the article. It made me chuckle. 😄

The movie industry is becoming delusional about itself, it seems. The media covering the movie industry doesn't help, as they ignore reality and/or sugar-coat the basic facts that they don't like. It's bizarre, and seems unhealthy to me.

This Hollywood Reporter article on Strange World's historically bad box office is a perfect example.
Enough of your toxic masculinity @TP2000! We all don't live in your macho cisgender world of brunches, martini recipes, and Doris Day movies!!!

(I've been off for awhile, are we still saying @TP2000 isn't gay enough to comment on animated movies on a Disney fan forum? Somebody catch me up.)
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
Wall-E is pretty much the exception (unless you also count the Despicable Me and Incredibles Franchises).

In addition to Disney, I browsed through Don Bluth, Dreamworks, Illumination, and Blue Sky. The only other sort of sci-fi movie I could find to have done well is Robots from 2005, which seems all but forgotten by now. Sci-Fi animation just seems like a tough sell to the general public, for some reason.
I wish Titan A.E. did well. I like that movie.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom