News Tron coaster coming to the Magic Kingdom

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Why would you think they would be horrendous? The train would still go from Main Street to Fantasy Land. Sure you will have some people on for a longer time but some will be on it for a shorter time. It will even out on average.
It’s one train instead of 3 or 4 when you run shuttle mode, so it would take at least half an hour to return to Main Street after leaving. Probably more like 40 min. You’d have lines down to the Hub during that 40 min and people at the end would need to wait at least 2 cycles.

Absolute nightmare.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
It’s one train instead of 3 or 4 when you run shuttle mode, so it would take at least half an hour to return to Main Street after leaving. Probably more like 40 min. You’d have lines down to the Hub during that 40 min and people at the end would need to wait at least 2 cycles.

Absolute nightmare.

That is hyperbole of course.

Shorter trip in shuttle mode, while not the most efficient, it has a huge capacity. People knowing it would only take them to Fantasyland or to MSUA from Fantasyland would not wait until the hub. Even if some did not know, most would know that is for the train and that is all it is going to and would give up waiting far beyond that point.

If Disney is not worried about not running the train around the park at all, I don't think efficiency of attraction crowd patterns and capacity is their top concern. And they are capping attendance and have had park hopping rules into effect for supposedly to assist with that kind of reason.

It is more that they that they are not wanting to staff it and deal with an operational cost that does not provide much income, so they can take their time on this very long project that turned into a longer one. A mix of Tron's slow construction and Parking Tram logic.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
That is hyperbole of course.

Shorter trip in shuttle mode, while not the most efficient, it has a huge capacity. People knowing it would only take them to Fantasyland or to MSUA from Fantasyland would not wait until the hub. Even if some did not know, most would know that is for the train and that is all it is going to and would give up waiting far beyond that point.

If Disney is not worried about not running the train around the park at all, I don't think efficiency of attraction crowd patterns and capacity is their top concern. And they are capping attendance and have had park hopping rules into effect for supposedly to assist with that kind of reason.

It is more that they that they are not wanting to staff it and deal with an operational cost that does not provide much income, so they can take their time on this very long project that turned into a longer one. A mix of Tron and Parking Trams.
I do not observe the same guests as you do. I observe guests waiting an hour for popcorn and then *itching about it on Facebook. And I do not think a 30 min cycle is hyperbolic. Trains normally come every 5 to 10 min. Stretching that to 30 (or even 25, which is the minimum; the trip alone is about 10 min each way).

Also, why wouldn’t they stop in Frontierland? People would be very confused and angry if not allowed off.

This simply doesn’t work in 2021.
 
Last edited:

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
This I can buy. However, the WDW of today has no concept of what Good Show is anymore.

If memory serves me, didn't they run shuttle mode for a bit some time ago?
Indeed. That was confirmed here...

Insiders have said there's an issue with sightlines going the opposite way which previous Disney was willing to risk, but current Disney isn't.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I do not observe the same guests as you do. I observe guests waiting an hour for popcorn and then *itching about it on Facebook. And I do not think a 30 min cycle is hyperbolic. Trains normally come every 5 to 10 min. Stretching that to 30 (or even 25, which is the minimum; the trip alone is about 10 min each way).

Also, why wouldn’t they stop in Frontierland? People would be very confused and angry if not allowed off.

This simply doesn’t work in 2021.

If you want to play the insult guests or clueless guests that is your choice. Yes, there are some that will wait rather than realizing they could have walked a shorter distance in a shorter amount of time. The majority/enough will decide for themselves it is reasonable or not. One large train could handle it, it would actually ease up operation on other accessible attractions as another offering in the park. The train's appeal lowers when it is not known to be in full operation and is something that eats people even with one train operation.

You act like Disney has always run each train.

Disney has shown they don't care about the guest wait times being not as efficient.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
If you want to play the insult guests or clueless guests that is your choice. Yes, there are some that will wait rather than realizing they could have walked a shorter distance in a shorter amount of time. The majority/enough will decide for themselves it is reasonable or not. One large train could handle it, it would actually ease up operation on other accessible attractions as another offering in the park. The train's appeal lowers when it is not known to be in full operation and is something that eats people even with one train operation.

You act like Disney has always run each train.

Disney has shown they don't care about the guest wait times being not as efficient.
I’m done with this nonsense. I think they made the right call here.

They just need to hurry up and finish the outside of TRON.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
I’m done with this nonsense. I think they made the right call here.

They just need to hurry up and finish the outside of TRON.

That is fine. Whether you think they made the right call or not, it would seem that the line to the hub for the train would seem Hyperbolic, at least once people realize the line is for the shuttling train. But maybe you have more access to that insight of operations than I I currently do.

Either way, calling a conversation with someone "nonsense" is not the best tact.

I think anyone would agree with your second point, and clear that they have not cared about rushing that either.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
I would but I don't feel like debating anyone on the quality of a non-existent attraction for the 23489458th time at the moment. Used to this type of thing with EPCOT, not MK.
It exists. You can watch videos on YouTube. We know exactly what it is and where it’s going.

But if you don’t want to argue, that’s perfectly fine.
 

Vinnie Mac

Well-Known Member
It exists. You can watch videos on YouTube. We know exactly what it is and where it’s going.

But if you don’t want to argue, that’s perfectly fine.
You're right, I keep forgetting that this thing actually does exist. I've seen videos of it and the first time I saw a POV of TLCR overseas I felt a little envious of them because I thought it was amazing.

If you want my opinion on it, I guess that should tell you for the most part. Don't want to argue about it but I am willing to casually converse.
 
Last edited:

Smooth

Well-Known Member
Is Conversate a Word? Conversate is a nonstandard verb that means “to have a conversation.” The standard verb (and the one you should use if you want to be correct) is converse.
1635467813885.png
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
You're right, I keep forgetting that this thing actually does exist. I've seen videos of it and the first time I saw a POV of TLCR overseas I felt a little envious of them because I thought it was amazing.

If you want my opinion on it, I guess that should tell you for the most part. Don't want to argue about it but I am willing to casually conversate.

Kind of like the management team over the project at TDO! Or the general public and the movies it is based on.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom